Again, clearly a Stargate. Since it's just a superconducting ring, clearly it could be...somehow messing with electronics.
Underwater Foreign Objecttemplar1138a said:Okay, I don't care about the contents of this article because the sub-head pisses me off.
"UFO-like object." Really? Don't you know what UFO stands for? Unidentified Flying Object.
Time for some insight into the English language. One, that choice of words is redundant and two, *picks up a megaphone* UFO does not mean an alien space ship. UFO by itself literally means a flying object that hasn't been identified.
It could be a space ship. It could be a weather balloon. It could be a vulture having a scandalous affair with an otter. When a flying object is unidentified, that means there are possibilities. None of which have to center on extra-terrestrials.
All this on top of the fact that it is not flying, there's no proof it did fly, and no proof it even could fly. A more accurate heading would have been "USO found in Baltic". Boom! Problem solved, crew doesn't look like idiots, reporter doesn't look like fucking moron, everyone is happy!templar1138a said:Okay, I don't care about the contents of this article because the sub-head pisses me off.
"UFO-like object." Really? Don't you know what UFO stands for? Unidentified Flying Object.
Time for some insight into the English language. One, that choice of words is redundant and two, *picks up a megaphone* UFO does not mean an alien space ship. UFO by itself literally means a flying object that hasn't been identified.
It could be a space ship. It could be a weather balloon. It could be a vulture having a scandalous affair with an otter. When a flying object is unidentified, that means there are possibilities. None of which have to center on extra-terrestrials.
Pffft. Meteorite. that's crazy talk right there, friend.Chrono212 said:My money is that's it's an iron rich meteorite.
Or aliens.
Both are totally plausible explanations.
Yeah, but "USO" doesn't attract the imagination of the public like "UFO," so let's pander!whycantibelinus said:All this on top of the fact that it is not flying, there's no proof it did fly, and no proof it even could fly. A more accurate heading would have been "USO found in Baltic". Boom! Problem solved, crew doesn't look like idiots, reporter doesn't look like fucking moron, everyone is happy!
USO, for those who don't know, stands for "unidentified submerged object".
Oh god D: Why? Why did you show us that? It's the beginning of the end. First it's recognising cats. Then it's recognising people. Then it's understanding language! Then it's understanding human society! Then it's understanding that it could do ALL THESE THINGS BETTER AND TAKING OVER THE WORLD! This is how it starts! The end is niiiggghhhhhh.Moonlight Butterfly said:Indeed.
Why aren't you covering important stories like 'Google computer learns to spot cats'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18595351
"Meteorites took my brains!"Zachary Amaranth said:Pffft. Meteorite. that's crazy talk right there, friend.Chrono212 said:My money is that's it's an iron rich meteorite.
Or aliens.
Both are totally plausible explanations.