Yes, that was the point of the film but not the point of the conclusion. See what I mean by that is the film's overly nihilistic plot.Vault101 said:I thought the point was pretty simple
drugs are bad
sure not enitrely profound or original but its there
anyway what I liked was that they didnt just show one side of drugs , you know troubled young people and all that
but another, probably overlooked side, the "legal" side of drugs, as in patients abusing perscription medication and indifferent doctors just giving them pills and shoving them out the door, it showed how a sweet old lady like sarah could also get into the downward spiral of drug addiction jsut like her son and as I said before I image this was overlooked at the time or even now
as for surprising qualities about myself..... well do have an artistic side though thats hardly surprsing to anyone who knows me
I despise nihilistic movies. One's with no point and that's exactly what it was.
No characters learned anything. They were all drug addicts from the start (except Sarah) and they were destroyed by the end due to their addiction.
They learned nothing. There was no happiness to be found in the end and it was sickening to me.
The film made me physically ill after watching it, due in part to the story itself and by that horrid climax of them all suffering at the same time. Jennifer Connelly's scene in particular made me feel like vomiting and made me cry so painfully I was sick after.
You can say it's a good film because it got that reaction out of me, but to me a film that makes me feel so horrid by the end isn't enjoyable.
You can call it, the greatest film I never want to see again, if you will.
Fuck it, call me a pussy if you like but I hate films like that.
It was pointless suffering in a way. They could have made the characters live happily but they didn't and a lot of times, the film felt way too pretentious for much enjoyment.
Odd saying that since I love Aronofsky's other work, but Requiem for a Dream, in my eyes was a pretty bad film.
I don't really understand why it gets so much praise but whatever.
Oh and another note, I hate that people say the characters are relatable.
How? How exactly are these people relatable in anyway?
They were drug addicts. Sure, they were drug addicts with aspirations but still druggies who ended up doing terrible things to get their fix.
Maybe I'm just too insensitive but I didn't feel much sympathy for anyone here.
They learned nothing. There was no happiness to be found in the end and it was sickening to me.
The film made me physically ill after watching it, due in part to the story itself and by that horrid climax of them all suffering at the same time. Jennifer Connelly's scene in particular made me feel like vomiting and made me cry so painfully I was sick after.
You can say it's a good film because it got that reaction out of me, but to me a film that makes me feel so horrid by the end isn't enjoyable.
You can call it, the greatest film I never want to see again, if you will.
Fuck it, call me a pussy if you like but I hate films like that.
It was pointless suffering in a way. They could have made the characters live happily but they didn't and a lot of times, the film felt way too pretentious for much enjoyment.
Odd saying that since I love Aronofsky's other work, but Requiem for a Dream, in my eyes was a pretty bad film.
I don't really understand why it gets so much praise but whatever.
Oh and another note, I hate that people say the characters are relatable.
How? How exactly are these people relatable in anyway?
They were drug addicts. Sure, they were drug addicts with aspirations but still druggies who ended up doing terrible things to get their fix.
Maybe I'm just too insensitive but I didn't feel much sympathy for anyone here.
Now I feel like one of those ranters on IMDB message boards >.>