If ever there were more chilling words...Andy Chalk said:because the government has only the best of intentions.
Oh, the government only has the best intentions? Oh, that's alright then, I mean, feel free to censure things you don't like, as long as you had the best intentions.Andy Chalk said:Swiss Ban "Probably" Won't Affect Many Games
One of the politicians behind the recently-passed proposal to ban violent videogames in Switzerland says it's likely that only a few games would be prohibited, but hopes that in long run it will encourage developers to move away from the worst excesses of videogame violence.
Two resolutions seeking to restrict videogame sales in Switzerland were Evi Allemann [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/99266-Switzerland-to-Ban-Violent-Videogames], who sponsored one of the laws, said the final result would likely result in only a handful of games actually being banned.
"The absolute prohibition should only apply to individual games," she said in an interview with 20 Minutes Online. She estimated that only about "a dozen" games would be affected, comparing the new Swiss laws to those already in place in Germany, where Mortal Kombat and Manhunt are banned but Counter-Strike isn't.
PEGI is insufficient to properly rate games, she claimed, because it's too closely linked to the videogame industry. "It takes an industry-independent federal agency, which sets age limits for certain games or [classifies] other games as harmless," she said.
A bit surprisingly, perhaps, she admitted that there's no actual proof of a link between videogaming and violent behavior, adding that as long as kids are in a "stable social environment," gaming is "usually not a problem." Nonetheless, she wants games that involve "cruel acts of violence" kept away from Swiss gamers and hopes that game developers, particularly those in the U.S., will eventually begin to focus on "other types of games" and move away from the worst of the violent content.
It's a bit of a tricky to follow (made a little easier by alternating between Yahoo [http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.20min.ch%2Fnews%2Fschweiz%2Fstory%2F19217414%23talkback&sl=auto&tl=en] translations) but in the end it seems to come down to Allemann telling everyone that there's nothing to worry about because the government has only the best of intentions. How about it, folks: Is that good enough for you?
via: GamePolitics [http://gamepolitics.com/2010/04/05/swiss-game-ban-may-feature-only-little-censorship]
Permalink
Don't know about Switzerland and Australia, but at the moment Germany is run by conservatives. One of the two parties in power are liberal, but from what I understand our meaning of the word differs from that of, say, the one common in the USA. The crazy leftwing nutbags don't have much of a say right now, but they are gaining ground somewhat, which worries me.WickedSkin said:Switzerland, Germany, Australia... They are all have lefties running the government right?
I concur. The system that's in place here right now regarding censorship in games is utter bollocks, and more often than not I find myself ordering my games from Austria rather than buying them at Media Markt or Amazon.Green Ninja said:Yes, that is how it works in Germany and it is a deeply flawed system because there is a limit on how "violent" a game with the highest rating can be, which is quite ridicolous if you think about it.Andy Chalk said:"The absolute prohibition should only apply to individual games," she said in an interview with 20 Minutes Online. She estimated that only about "a dozen" games would be affected, comparing the new Swiss laws to those already in place in Germany, where Mortal Kombat and Manhunt are banned but Counter-Strike isn't.
PEGI is insufficient to properly rate games, she claimed, because it's too closely linked to the videogame industry. "It takes an industry-independent federal agency, which sets age limits for certain games or [classifies] other games as harmless," she said.
@Wicked Skin: Not quite. We have a left party and they're gaining ground but they're not in the government. Yet.
And thus your opinion is void, you can disappear now. Seriously, what a selfish attitude. You should care because people who have the same hobbies you do are being told they are not mature enough to handle adult content.natranr said:I don't live in Switzerland, why should I care. As long as the US don't ban any Valve or Blizzard games; I'm fine.
Does she seriously think that not being able to legally sell some games in Switzerland has a chance of changing the habits of American developers? Think about it, the US has nearly 40 times the population of Switzerland. At best they'll get censored versions of games deemed "too violent" by whatever metric they use.Nonetheless, she wants games that involve "cruel acts of violence" kept away from Swiss gamers and hopes that game developers, particularly those in the U.S., will eventually begin to focus on "other types of games" and move away from the worst of the violent content.
That isn't the problem. That's the militia they have. As long as they're sane, they won't do much. Besides, everyone has a gun to stop a weirdo if they go nuts.The_Decoy said:Maybe they should start not giving everyone guns rather than banning essentially harmless games.
I fail to see the sense in giving every 19 year old male a Sturmgewehr 90 but taking away their virtual weapons. Madness.
Ftaghn To You Too said:That isn't the problem. That's the militia they have. As long as they're sane, they won't do much. Besides, everyone has a gun to stop a weirdo if they go nuts.
Censorship is what I hate MOST out of everything. The more they try to crack down, the more things will get banned as obscene, until only Sugar Happy Funland 3 is released.
Very true...Kiefer13 said:However limited in scope though it may be, it's still censorship and I still don't agree with it. People need to be free to make their own choices about what is "appropriate" for them to watch or play, and not be "shielded" from certain things just because the misguided government thinks that they should be. That's a dangerous road, down a very slippery slope.