Well, it's a bit trickier than that, because while the service weapon is a common suicide weapon as far as I understand using it for murdering others (and others that aren't practice cardboard targets) is a fairly recent trend (been happening, say, mostly around the last ten years), and having that young a perpetrator is a really recent trend (usually it's more of a midlife crisis thing). Since there's otherwise about a quarter of the population possessing the same rifle they're naturally trying to find some other factor that set the guy apart.Jamash said:You can't seriously blame videogames for the gun related actions of (a member of) the army, since soldiers have been shooting people since ranged warfare was invented, hundreds if not thousands of years before videogames.
Plus it's easier to pick on videogames, which are probably frowned upon or at least misunderstood by most citizens over 30, than the army, a federal institution in which most of said citizens served and one of the symbols of the country.