Therumancer said:
I disagree on addiction in general. There are psycological components to addictions, but I do believe people can be addicted to things without personality flaws. A good example of this would be how pimps and whoremasters will get their girls addicted to drugs as a way of controlling them. All sarcasm about "nobody forced a needle in your arm" aside, in some cases that's exactly what happens.
And some people get addicted in this way, and others do not. The difference? It's psychological. After all, this hypothetical person has
already fallen in with pimps and whoremasters--shouldn't that be a sign that they're already making less-than-ideal choices?
Don't think that I'm using "psychological disorders" or "personality flaws" in the way pop-science does. I don't think that every single thing that happens is "genetic" or "a chemical imbalance in the brain." These problems that lead to addictive behavior are developed over time, throughout childhood even, and can also be worked on in a similar manner.
It's like this, if your typical "extreme" gamer of any age was hit by a bolt of destiny, and given their ideal life, it's doubtful that nothing would change and they would remain right there playing video games. Rather they would head off to their awesome, and important job, have sex with their gorgeous girlfriend or wife, and spend their mountains of cash travelling around the world or whatever. If he was an addict this wouldn't be the case. He might still like video games, but he sure as heck wouldn't spend anywhere near as much time playing them.
Many, however, would behave as addicts. You're creating an ideal situation where one may not exist--this bolt of destiny can't be allowed to change a person's personality or psychology, or you've got a totally different person, and no point is proved. If they are severely introverted, antisocial, feeling persecuted, video games offer a decent escape and "power fantasy" for them. Without video games, they'd simply have found another.
What makes addiction different from obsession is that the addiction begins to supercede the reasons for beginning it. You got into X because it was fun/relaxing, but now you do it because... well... because it's what you do. Your mind gives up control, and you go on autopilot to the last place where you felt "okay." You are no longer
choosing to engage in the activity in any conscious way, it's just your new default setting, regardless of consequences.
That is a personality type, usually developed over a lifetime. Withdrawal, the physical side of the coin, has an impact on whether a person chooses to
fix the problem. Of course, that withdrawal can also be psychological. If a person becomes addicted to a coping mechanism (actually an
avoidance mechanism), and they have to quit it to break the addiction, they're suddenly forced to cope directly with reality, which can be pretty jarring and send them running straight back.
Korean internet obsession is not an addiction but simply making used of one of their better national resources. Korea being in the state it is, I'm not surprised there are far more people hitting the escapism hard there than in most places.
Obsession borders on, and can easily become, addiction. Someone who uses the internet
a lot is not necessarily obsessed or addicted. But when it becomes a ruling force in their lives, or leads them to destructive behaviors, it's in a different ballpark.