Although at least the changing monsters mean you've got new attack patterns to learn and anticipate. Still mostly just the same thing though, though you might not care if you're enjoying the combat so much. I certainly didn't.DVS BSTrD said:Come play the new quests, same as the old quest.
But you can tell for sure these weren't modeled after real children because they have bunny ears. Real children don't have those.Xiado said:Wow, one of the few reviews that didn't mention the loli race, how professional. Anyway, I wouldn't buy this game if I lived in Sweden, if I were you.
Given the single player feel of TOR, I'd pass on anything like it again. It actively had me telling people in Vent to shut up so I could listen to a cut scene.Irridium said:I'd probably be all over this game if not for The Old Republic. After playing that game... I just don't want to go back to the impersonal text boxes.
Now if a game came along that combined The Old Republic's focus on story with Tera's combat, well... I may never be heard from again.
Its nothing like Vindictus. Vindictus you can interact with your environment, smash crates and barrels over the heads of enemies, interact with traps, climb ladders, break objects, etc. Tera has the basic attacks similar, but its a standard mmo "look don't touch" affair. Its a shame really that you can't interact with the world because it would do loads for the game. Also Tera relies on cooldowns for skills instead of stamina.Genixma said:So it's Vindictus except with character customization and anyone can be anything.
Speaking as someone who has both Tera, and GW2. The combat, that is why. He played a lancer (Tank) Who don't really do damage at all and have the most boring combat, they are the ones that hold agro. But I play one of the two healer classes (Mystic, better pvp) and I can tell you now, I'm glad I now have a game where combat isn't dictated by equipment. I can still win against someone 4-5 levels above me, so long as I'm on the ball, even being a healer, because skill.CriticKitten said:-snip-
In all fairness, that was not my character. I (the reviewer and writer of the script) was not able to capture footage of my ACTUAL character, so Greg (the narrator) had to do the prologue. And he chose a lancer and doesn't know how to play. Combat is a LOT more fun than what is demonstrated in the video.CriticKitten said:The quest window looks....pretty much exactly like World of Warcraft, as if they copied it wholesale. And is combat looks like a less dynamic version of Guild Wars 2. Yet we're supposed to believe TERA is a beacon of originality. Yeah, sorry, not buying what you're selling. Keep in mind this is the same development group being sued for stealing art from NCSoft (the company that currently sponsors ArenaNet, makers of GW2), so it's not like TERA's developers have any sort of basis in originality to begin with.
I was legitimately cracking up as the reviewer described how dynamic the combat is, while his character stood perfectly still and spammed the same attack over and over. MY, HOW RIVETING. Hate to say it, but GW2 is already going there and it's doing what TERA is trying to do a heck of a lot better. GW2's still got its flaws of course, since dynamic event scaling in the last beta was pretty far off-target, and there are other issues too. But I prefer its dynamic events to the old WoW quest structure that TERA has copied.
The reviewer was right about one thing though: it's a game caught between the past and future of MMO gaming, in that it duplicates elements from both the past and future games of the MMO genre, and doesn't look like it struck the right balance in either one. With virtually no story, only mildly dynamic combat, and an outdated questing structure, what exactly is supposed to attract me to this game as a skeptic and possible buyer? It uses WoW's questing system so identically that even the quest giving window reminds me of WoW, it has combat that (in any footage of the game I've seen) appears far less dynamic than people say it is, and its story doesn't hold a candle to either SWTOR or GW2.
....so, am I supposed to buy it for the lolis, then? No, I'm serious. Where's the draw? Why are people so hyped about this title? The more I see, the less I like.
All of the armor is skimpy for females with the exception of the Amani, even the starting armor. It just turns into different kinds of skimpy.Rainboq said:I would be interest, if not for the female armour sets. Seriously, if you want to have skimpy armour, fine, BUT DON'T MAKE IT BE THE BETTER ARMOUR. I'm pretty sure EC talked about it.