No, the best way to settle any issue whatsoever is with a children's card game.Stall said:Texas... great place to file suit you know. Just give a few hundred thousand to a judge's campaign fund and you are set!
And you think I'm kidding, aren't you?
Because we live in a litigious society where the court is often viewed as the best place settle problems.SilverUchiha said:but why is everyone so sue-happy these days?
Yes. But this isn't about actually winning. They are probably hoping to extract licence payments.Ariyura said:Correct me if I'm wrong but their patent was only recognized last year, doesn't that favor Nintendo and the other companies they're suing?
^This. There was no need to mention what state the company is from, especially in the title. Now people are going to make dumb comments like "Texas, huh. Why am I not surprised." just so they can justify their feeling of superiority over people they've never met and have only heard stereotypes about.Frostbite3789 said:Why even include Texas in the article? It has jack squat to do with the state.
Just know Texas is an easy to hate state? This is exactly what I'm talking about when I talk about spin and how sickeningly easy it is. You play off mob rule, and know most people will readily make fun of Texas.
For The Bethesda suit why isn't the article "Maryland company suing a company in Sweden"?
Because they're a more recognizable name? What bearing does that have on it?
People know who Mojang and Bethesda are.Frostbite3789 said:Why even include Texas in the article? It has jack squat to do with the state.
Just know Texas is an easy to hate state? This is exactly what I'm talking about when I talk about spin and how sickeningly easy it is. You play off mob rule, and know most people will readily make fun of Texas.
For The Bethesda suit why isn't the article "Maryland company suing a company in Sweden"?
Because they're a more recognizable name? What bearing does that have on it?