The 8th generation arrived.....last year.

kasperbbs

New member
Dec 27, 2009
1,855
0
0
Personally i don't consider wii U to be next gen since specs actually do matter when designing games. The way i see it wii U is made for Nintendo fans who will overlook the lack of 3rd party support and thats okay, but i'm not one of them.
 

xaszatm

That Voice in Your Head
Sep 4, 2010
1,146
0
0
Mothhive said:
WeepingAngels said:
Mothhive said:
WeepingAngels said:
Mothhive said:
WeepingAngels said:
Mothhive said:
In terms of technology, a generation is defined as "a specified stage of development in manufacture, usually implying improvement". The Wii U was not an improvement over the 7th generation consoles, and therefore belongs to that generation.
Wii U is an improvement over Wii. Wii was an improvement over Gamecube. Gamecube was an improvement over N64 and so on.

Is it written somewhere that they must exceed their competitions technology by a certain percentage?
It was not an improvement over currently available technology, thus, not a new generation.

I'll go back to my ridiculous fork example if you like, and ask whether you think a fork is next gen, even if it's a regular borning metal fork like all the others out there, simply because the person that made it used to make wooden forks?
Your fork example doesn't really work because forks don't have generations, atleast not yet.

Oh so now instead of having better tech than their competition, they must also improve over currently available technology like PC technology?
I'm aware forks aren't considered to have generations, but I was trying to give a humorous example that was easy to understand.

As for PCs, we're talking about console generations, so PCs don't enter into it (which is a good thing because they are much harder to quantify as they are in a constant state of improvement). So yes, new generations have to be a vast improvement over previous generations. Nintendo may have improved on their previous console, so it would be fair to say it's a new generation of Nintendo Console, but they have merely caught up to the 7th gen consoles with the Wii U, so they belong to that generation.

I like how insistent you are that large technical improvement is an arbitrary way to gauge a console generation, when your criteria, time, is even more arbitrary. Is the Xbox One 9th generation because it comes out after the 8th Gen PS4?
Time has always been the defining factor and it is the case here too. The Wii competed against 7th gen consoles and it won in terms of sales. The Wii was not competing against 6th gen consoles even though it was close to the specs of the Xbox. It makes no sense that you think the Wii U will be competing against 7th gen consoles too.
So now it's dependant on who the console competes with for sales which defines which generation it is? Hasn't the Wii U already been competing with (and losing to) the 360 and the PS3 for the past year? So surely that makes it 7th Gen? Also, if it struggles to compete with the other 7th Gen consoles, it certainly won't be able to compete with the 8th Gen consoles. And if it doesn't compete with them, then it's not part of that generation, right?
So, by your logic, the Xbox 360 was 6th Gen then? Or does the Xbox 360 get a pass because its Microsoft? The Wii U is part of this generation. Get. Over. It.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
Guitarmasterx7 said:
Think of it this way. You're a buxom young lady at the beach and the three companies are guys at trying to catch your eye. Microsoft and Sony are chiseled tan hunks of men letting the sun rays glisten off of their perfect washboard abs as they come out of the water in slow motion. Nintendo is the scrawny pasty guy on the shore, introspectively staring off into the horizon and painting a picture of the sea.
Your analogy made me laugh, but I can still improve upon it.

Again you're a young lady at the beach, only the PS3 and 360 are two 17 year old jocks, wrestling with eachother, while the wii, an 11 year old kid, is building a sand castle. The PC is your middle aged dad. Who will you date and why?
 

Spaceman Spiff

New member
Sep 23, 2013
604
0
0
teebeeohh said:
MetalDooley said:
Anyone who talks about "next-gen" in relation to power is making about as much sense as Han Solo when he uses parsecs as a unit of time
part of the Kessel run moves you close to a cluster of black holes, the closer you fly to that the shorter the route you have to take.
Heh, I was going to suggest that too. The shorter your flight path, the more dangerous it is, the bigger your balls, the more bragging rights you get. Though I'm not sure how long a parsec actually is or what the Kessel Run actually looks like to determine if 12 parsecs is an appropriate distance for such a run.

On topic: I think the reason people don't really associate the WiiU with gen8 is that it's more comparable to the PS3 and 360 than it will be to the PS4 and 180. I do think of it as gen8, but also that the gen8 party hasn't started yet. Nintendo just arrived early.
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,698
0
0
nima55 said:
I get the feeling that if say 4 E3s from now Nintendo introduced a box with 100gb of ram, 1 TB of storage space, a gpu that could calculate pi to the last digit and it only cost a hundred bucks, people would still dismiss it.
If Nintendo did that then we might actually consider them next gen. Defend them all you like, Nintendo has almost no third party support for the very reasons espoused in this thread. They are too far behind the curve technologically for Moore's law to even remotely apply to them. You look forward to the next Mario, Zelda, or Metroid. I'll stick to my PC, which IS upgradeable, and the true next gen consoles that at least attempt to keep up with current technological trends for higher graphic fidelity, more interative environments, and overall increased immersion. I am looking forward to the next 2 years of gaming simply because major developers will not feel nearly so bottlenecked whenever a console port of a PC game is requested.
 

Guitarmasterx7

Day Pig
Mar 16, 2009
3,872
0
0
veloper said:
Guitarmasterx7 said:
Think of it this way. You're a buxom young lady at the beach and the three companies are guys at trying to catch your eye. Microsoft and Sony are chiseled tan hunks of men letting the sun rays glisten off of their perfect washboard abs as they come out of the water in slow motion. Nintendo is the scrawny pasty guy on the shore, introspectively staring off into the horizon and painting a picture of the sea.
Your analogy made me laugh, but I can still improve upon it.

Again you're a young lady at the beach, only the PS3 and 360 are two 17 year old jocks, wrestling with eachother, while the wii, an 11 year old kid, is building a sand castle. The PC is your middle aged dad. Who will you date and why?
My dad, because I'm a little bit fucked up that way. Wait...
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
Guitarmasterx7 said:
veloper said:
Guitarmasterx7 said:
Think of it this way. You're a buxom young lady at the beach and the three companies are guys at trying to catch your eye. Microsoft and Sony are chiseled tan hunks of men letting the sun rays glisten off of their perfect washboard abs as they come out of the water in slow motion. Nintendo is the scrawny pasty guy on the shore, introspectively staring off into the horizon and painting a picture of the sea.
Your analogy made me laugh, but I can still improve upon it.

Again you're a young lady at the beach, only the PS3 and 360 are two 17 year old jocks, wrestling with eachother, while the wii, an 11 year old kid, is building a sand castle. The PC is your middle aged dad. Who will you date and why?
My dad, because I'm a little bit fucked up that way. Wait...
That's correct. And do you also know why?
 

Ruzinus

New member
May 20, 2010
213
0
0
WeepingAngels said:
Ruzinus said:
KazeAizen said:
When did console generations begin being defined by tech specs?
In 1996 when Nintendo named its next gen console the Nintendo 64 to try and make it seem better than the Playstation.
...or before that when Sega put 16 BIT on the front of the Genesis? We learned that bits aren't really that big of a thing before N64 ever came out. Atleast I did. Can you even tell me what advantage 64 bit had over the 32 bit Playstation or the 32 bit PC?
You might've, but I sure didn't. I was I think 9 when the 64 came out, and I sure thought it was twice as powerful as the Playstation.

The entire concept of a console generation is a marketing thing, and the marketing works.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
KazeAizen said:
When did console generations begin being defined by tech specs?
Isnt that how console generations were always defined? New consoles alwaysa having new tech that allows for new, better games, yadda yadda...
 

snowbear

New member
May 31, 2011
89
0
0
Who cares what generation they call it... just buy what ever you want.

Personally I'm sticking with my PC/WII U combo so I'll get the best combination of great games. I might pick up one of the other two later on if some decent exclusives turn up and catch my eye.

If anyone does/doesn't buy hardware based on a number assigned to it but somebody online, then they don't deserve to play decent games anyway.
 

Megahedron

New member
Aug 27, 2010
90
0
0
Time to fart in the wind.

I'll give you my favorite reasons people say WiiU is last gen: To make fun of it/Nintendo, thereby angering strangers on the internet. We gamers are brand loyal (I know I am) so it's fun to create us/them scenarios where we win. And lastly, because a video game generation is not a legally defined term, we can say whatever we want and no one can prove us wrong (much like 3G and 4G).

In my ever-so-humble opinion, I think it will be part of the 8th gen, but not until the 8th gen starts. I think we're still in the 7th gen until a decent chunk of releases are on the new consoles which won't start until the 'bone and PS4 are out. If, however, Nintendo releases another console four or five years before Microsoft or Sony (possible, if unlikely) we will probably all in retrospect have to consider the WiiU to be 7.5.
 

nima55

Paladin of Traffic Law
Nov 14, 2010
214
0
0
Remus said:
nima55 said:
If Nintendo did that then we might actually consider them next gen. Defend them all you like, Nintendo has almost no third party support for the very reasons espoused in this thread. They are too far behind the curve technologically for Moore's law to even remotely apply to them. You look forward to the next Mario, Zelda, or Metroid. I'll stick to my PC, which IS upgradeable, and the true next gen consoles that at least attempt to keep up with current technological trends for higher graphic fidelity, more interative environments, and overall increased immersion. I am looking forward to the next 2 years of gaming simply because major developers will not feel nearly so bottlenecked whenever a console port of a PC game is requested.
Or I could be one of the sensible people that have both a pc and a Nintendo console best of both worlds.
 

snowbear

New member
May 31, 2011
89
0
0
veloper said:
Guitarmasterx7 said:
veloper said:
Guitarmasterx7 said:
Think of it this way. You're a buxom young lady at the beach and the three companies are guys at trying to catch your eye. Microsoft and Sony are chiseled tan hunks of men letting the sun rays glisten off of their perfect washboard abs as they come out of the water in slow motion. Nintendo is the scrawny pasty guy on the shore, introspectively staring off into the horizon and painting a picture of the sea.
Your analogy made me laugh, but I can still improve upon it.

Again you're a young lady at the beach, only the PS3 and 360 are two 17 year old jocks, wrestling with eachother, while the wii, an 11 year old kid, is building a sand castle. The PC is your middle aged dad. Who will you date and why?
My dad, because I'm a little bit fucked up that way. Wait...
That's correct. And do you also know why?
Because hes the best option right now and later on when he gets a bit older you can upgrade from him?
 

Alfredo Jones

New member
Jul 1, 2013
181
0
0
These days people always judge machines by their specs. It's the same reason why people will flock to stores every year to buy a new smartphone even though the one they have is perfectly functional. The only good thing that comes from this mindless pursuit of upgrading to the latest hardware is that it forces idiots to pump millions of dollars into the economy. Me, I don't upgrade unless it includes a feature that actually would be useful (like the iPhone 5S's fingerprint scanner).

The same thing applies to video game consoles. The Xbox One can have all the pretty polygons and Kinect stuff it wants, but if I don't see a game I like I ain't buying it. For those wondering I am planning on buying a PS4 because of Kingdom Hearts 3 and Final Fantasy XV. And the Wii U? Well I love me some Mario, Zelda, Donkey Kong, and all that other jazz so heck yeah I bought one. It's also my console of choice for any indie games since I can play on the Gamepad while watching Netflix on the big screen.

As for whether the Wii U is 8th gen or not, I say it is. The argument over whether a game is "next gen" because of its release date OR its specs is stupid. Why? Because the answer is that it is based on release date AND specs. A next generation console is one that releases at a date around the time of its competitors and is superior to its predecessor spec-wise in some degree. The Wii U was released last year and is more powerful than the last generation consoles, if only by a small margin. Unless some angel descends from heaven with a message from God saying "The Wii U is henceforth to be considered a 7th generation console" then it's not going to change.
 

Chaud

New member
Mar 29, 2011
28
0
0
yesbag said:
A gen is not really a "time frame". Though that does come into play when a new type is released.
But usually, it's based on the generation of systems.

My list will be incomplete, but has the main systems of the gens I've decided to show - I honestly don't remember if the Atari and Collecovision are first or second, so I won't include them:

8th: PS4, Xbone, WiiU
7th: PS3, 360, Wii
6th: PS2, Xbox, Gamecube, Dreamcast
5th: PS1, N64, Saturn
4th: SNES, Genesis, TG-16, Neo Geo
3rd: NES, Master System
Basically, this.

In fact, probably many of you here are too young to remember, but the definition of a "generation" based on hardware started since the time of the NES and Master System. When the MegaDrive (Genesis) was released, the fact that it was a 16-Bit console was spread to the four corners of the earth like it was something amazing. Seriously, it was *so* important that it is written at the top of the console itself! Do you have any idea of ​​how important it was to get to be part of the design of the very thing? Please!

The SuperNes didn't do the same, but in the advertisements it was also heavily touted the fact of being a 16-bit console, the millions of colors that it could use simultaneously and so many other things. With the arrival of the Playstation and Saturn the same thing happened again: the magazines highlighted the incredible potential of 32-bit video games and its three-dimensional games. (Although games like StarFox existed on the SNES already.) Again, all the weight was on hardware and specifically, in bits.

The last console trying to define a generation based on "bits " was, obviously, the Nintendo 64. It tried to put itself as part of a distinct generation of the others, but the design choices of Nintendo (the use cartridges instead of CDs as media for example) ended up making the N64 become an eccentric console, not exactly comparable to the others. That, of course, has become kind of a trend thereafter.

From this point on, I think we all remember. The XBOX and PS2 were clearly superior and, therefore, considered as a new generation. The power of consoles is and always has been the determining factor in the change of generations, especially the huge advance in *graphic* (yes , the frist true graphic wh*res were the console gamers) that has always distinguished the games of a new generation. That has always been the fundamental distinction between each generation in advertisements: the games of the new generation would be "incredibly" (well, not really) more beautiful than the later generation.

So I guess that's why many people don't really consider the WIIU as a new generation; simply because it isn't and will never be able to change the graphics level of what can be seen in the current generation consoles. It's at the same level. The PS4 and Xbox1 are obviously more powerful and, because of that, will raise the visuals of games released from now on. Hardware, as always, is the basis of the change. I'm not saying that this differentiation between the consoles is necessary or even useful. I'm just saying that's how it always was.
 

babinro

New member
Sep 24, 2010
2,518
0
0
Because the Wii U doesn't exist at the escapist.

Look at all the coverage it gets here.
Or how often polls on this site fail to include it as an option.

People are more likely to consider the 3DS Nintendo's 8th generation console over the WiiU.
The only thing that gets less recognition is mobile gaming.
 

OrpheusTelos

New member
Mar 24, 2012
353
0
0
yesbag said:
It's really not that tricky. I don't know why younger gamers have to needlessly complicate things these days.
Pretty much sums it up.

Incidentally, I will be buying a Wii U, because I missed out on the Wii and have quite a few games I'd like to try- Xenoblade, Last Story, Skyward Sword, etc. Not to mention I can play Wind Waker HD, Monolith Soft's X, the new Wii U Zelda when that comes out...

Sounds like a good deal.