You must be really stressed out if you scare that easily.Zontar said:And that is the reason I used "terrifying" in the OPDeathmageddon said:FOR SCIENCE!
You must be really stressed out if you scare that easily.Zontar said:And that is the reason I used "terrifying" in the OPDeathmageddon said:FOR SCIENCE!
I'm not really getting the impression this thing is just some thing scientists tried to figure out though. If it's just scientists trying to figure this random thing out I guess that's not creepy maybe. Still not the impression I get thoughchadachada123 said:But there IS plenty of science tied to human preferences, particularly sexual preferences. Men and women alike being slightly more attracted to people wearing red on average being the simplest example. That someone would do math related to this is no different from someone doing math to find the statistical best amount of cleavage to show for a particular bust size. That is to say, I can absolutely see someone doing that using grant money from taxpayers, because shit is pretty interesting, yo.Secondhand Revenant said:Paying overly much attention to such things is a bit creepy. Notice it's not just legs now it's gotten into some specific area and context they had to get a new word for. And to get a perfect ratio thing as is mentioned in the wiki link, it's clearly gotten into creepy territory, Sammael.Du Svardenvyrd said:Yeah, what next? People looking at cleavage, whale-tail, butt, booty, lips, feet, legs, abs... and so on and so on. Yeah, that would be crazy and weird. /sSecondhand Revenant said:Well I mean it is kinda creepy that people would be paying attention to that kind of thing. Even creepier if some are obsessing over it.
It's not as if this sort of studying is only done on females, either. I've seen one study suggesting that women in general prefer plain white or mostly-plain white t-shirts over other styles of clothing on men. Obviously everyone has personal tastes, but if someone wants to search for a mathematical trend, I don't see any reason to discourage them.
I don't get this thread. This isn't a new thing. I learned about this from No More Heroes 2 back in '09. Whats really wierd is that it came from the term in Evangelion. Which was basically the force field used by the space aliens to render all the military weapons useless. I'd be like calling areolas on women their "minovsky particles".erttheking said:I have to say, even though I'm a SJW and therefore apparently sex negative, I look at this and say "So what's the problem again?"
Yeah, if there's anything weird about this its where the name came from, if only because some people would use it as a basis for how geeky people can get.thanatos388 said:I don't get this thread. This isn't a new thing. I learned about this from No More Heroes 2 back in '09. Whats really wierd is that it came from the term in Evangelion. Which was basically the force field used by the space aliens to render all the military weapons useless. I'd be like calling areolas on women their "minovsky particles".erttheking said:I have to say, even though I'm a SJW and therefore apparently sex negative, I look at this and say "So what's the problem again?"
You should see my "no fly zone."thanatos388 said:I'd be like calling areolas on women their "minovsky particles".
I'm more of a "Zone of Alienation" guy myself.Something Amyss said:You should see my "no fly zone."thanatos388 said:I'd be like calling areolas on women their "minovsky particles".