I think I've worked out what it is.smallharmlesskitten said:Lord Krunk said:UPDATE: Included 'BB Code Abuse' point under the 'Probations' subtopic. Thanks to scotth266 for the idea.
Krunk.. i distinctly remember getting banned after 1000 posts or so.... ban time running out, making more posts and then getting the badge...
Didn't the mods clarify by editing the post to explain that it wasn't the "lol wut" that got him banned, it was the huge amounts of complaints they had received regarding him? Or was that Richard Groovy Pants' ban? As to the Neo badge, I think the whole point of it is to be hard to obtain. I really do love the fact that the badges require a lack of moderator wrath, since it makes them a far more accurate barometer of someone's contribution to the forums than post count alone.ravens_nest said:Just to point out that your banned post example, the infamous 'Eggo's Lol What?' post was one that had many people asking what he was banned for.
After all, it certainly isn't obvious. Maybe putting a more definitive example would make it clearer to the readers of this most excellent thread?
Well you shouldn't tempt them with shiny badges then SusanSusan Arendt said:Good. I hope they don't. It'll make it just that much easier for us to notice them and weed them out. We're not really interested in keeping postcount whores as part of our community.CuddlyCombine said:Anyone serious about the forums will (i.e. myself, you). Badge miners and postcounting freaks probably won't, or give it a skim at best.sorry user name taken. said:CuddlyCombine said:Helpful, but I'm still willing to bet that hardly anybody's going to read it.
i did >.>
And punish us for their really bad behavior? I'd rather not.Sparrow Tag said:Well you shouldn't tempt them with shiny badges then SusanSusan Arendt said:Good. I hope they don't. It'll make it just that much easier for us to notice them and weed them out. We're not really interested in keeping postcount whores as part of our community.CuddlyCombine said:Anyone serious about the forums will (i.e. myself, you). Badge miners and postcounting freaks probably won't, or give it a skim at best.sorry user name taken. said:CuddlyCombine said:Helpful, but I'm still willing to bet that hardly anybody's going to read it.
i did >.>![]()
I was having an angry day.Daye.04 said:Not .. Supposed .. To .. Post while influe.. Ah, what the hell. I probably won't get moderator wraith for this anyway.new_age-Reject said:Haha, I was having an 'off day' and I said something really stupid so fair dos lol.
How .. Off day? Like pissed, or not so natural feelings?
How really stupid? Like not very clever to say, or really stupid?
Come on, you'll be helpoing out fellow Escapists to know what side alleys not to enter in favor of Neo!
Ah. I guess it was kinda fair, then =Pnew_age_reject said:I was having an angry day.
Which means I tend to snap at people when they haven't even done anything to irritate me.
I got all up my own ass about the whole valentines day thing and I slated the whole love hearts thing we got for no reason which was out of place.
I'll seriously consider it; I was hoping people would categorise his post under 'Tier 1 Repeat Offenses', but it seems a few didn't.ravens_nest said:Just to point out that your banned post example, the infamous 'Eggo's Lol What?' post was one that had many people asking what he was banned for.
After all, it certainly isn't obvious. Maybe putting a more definitive example would make it clearer to the readers of this most excellent thread?
Actually... I was curious about that point myself, a while back, and made a poll regarding it. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.110411] The consensus was that people would prefer to see a repeat thread rather than a 3-4 month old one be resurrected. Naturally, different people had different lines (I don't recall anyone saying less than a month before they'd prefer a repeat), but for the most part, that statement is incorrect.Lord Krunk said:[li]Repeat Threads: I?m sure that many users (particularly the newer ones) are sick of the term ?use the Search Button? being flung around on their new thread. Well, there?s a good reason for that: your thread isn?t the first of its kind, and it certainly won?t be the last. On these forums, it is unspoken law that Thread Necroing > Repeat Threads, but many new users don?t know that and put up whatever was in the back of their heads. Some repeat threads do get past the bar, however, but my advice would still be to search for a thread resembling your idea first (between you and me, use Google; the Escapist?s search feature is renowned for not being as great as it should be).[/li]
I was suprised when this happened. (Yes, it was a slow day)Kuliani said:Note that the Probation color has changed.![]()
Zeeky_Santos said:Lord Krunk said:(between you and me, use Google; the Escapist's search feature is renowned for not being as great as it should be).
needs an update here. they changed it (finally), it is now a damned good search function. hooray!!!
Thanks for the info, the OP has been updated to suit this.Kuliani said:Note that the Probation color has changed.![]()
If you got on probation/suspended before your 1000th post, then you will not be able to receive either Morpheus or Neo.GodsOneMistake said:Very helpful but wait does that mean i wont get the Morphius badge :'(