The only reason that's true is because Eternal formats are pretty much the only formats where competitive combo decks are even possible. When you have the powerful creatures of recent sets, and powerful spells of older sets, they come together to make some great decks. And with all those aforementioned checks and balances of the Legacy format, it' prevents any one deck type from taking over.NameIsRobertPaulson said:Tcgplayer's stats go by calender year for some reason, but even if they're wrong, that's still around 45% of decks are combo. When almost half your decks are combo, it makes up a large portion of the format.SL33TBL1ND said:Ok, I set the search to look at the top eight. Out of the first 100 decks I read, about 55 or so were not combo decks, these were all placed 1st-3rd. There's another 195 decks to go through, but I think that's a pretty good indication.NameIsRobertPaulson said:Those are just the #1 finishers. Check the rest of the Top 8. Delver became such a huge hit because it's easy aggression while keeping counters up, something badly needed because of the combo decks. It was extreme compensation.SL33TBL1ND said:Did you even read that list?NameIsRobertPaulson said:3 in 4 decks in the Top 8 of Legacy tournaments this year have been combo. That's a higher percentage than the Caw-Blade decks when Jace the Skull Fucker dominated standard, and that card got banned as a result. The only non-combo deck to place regularly has been Canadian Threshold.SL33TBL1ND said:And it isn't, unless you're playing Eternal formats. Also, this may be kinda rude, jumping in like this, but with regards to your discussion about Legacy with the other guy, Legacy is really diverse.NameIsRobertPaulson said:The point was that mana-fixing shouldn't be expensive. Rosewater has said as such, because of how necessary it is to gameplay.SL33TBL1ND said:Yeah, and by extension, Shocklands aren't expensive.NameIsRobertPaulson said:Wasteland was printed way back in the day. Of course its price is high, because of the rarity of the card.SL33TBL1ND said:That's actually pretty cheap as far as staple lands go. Try and get your hands on some Wastelands or Duals for that much.NameIsRobertPaulson said:Except when something is that important, a single re-print barely changes the price.deth2munkies said:The reason why they're $20 is because they've been out of print for so long. Print them again, the price goes down. That's a VERY GOOD THING for people that want to get into Modern especially. Not to mention that you get more of them as you draft/buy packs.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I really hope the shocks don't come back, and they make an alternative like "Land - Plains Swamp Taps for W or B, comes into play tapped."deth2munkies said:As far as top constructed cards in the set, I'd generally hold off evaluation until R2R comes out because a lot of stuff (Liliana, Mutilate, the dual color common creatures) gets insanely better with shocklands.
By bringing back $20 lands, they widen the standard gap between players with money and players without. Mana fixing should never be expensive, because of how essential it is to the game. You don't need a Planeswalker or Titan to win, you need mana of the appropriate colors.
If they bring back the current Ravnica shock lands, I'm not playing standard till Ravnica 2 rotates. Sorry, I'd rather not spend $80 on lands.
Look at the M10 lands (Dragonskull Summit, Glacial Fortress, etc.) they're $2 a piece (or so) now and they were $20 when they came out.
Supply and demand, thought it'd be obvious.
Example 1: Primeval Titan. First print stabilized at $30, second at $25, currently at $15 after a THIRD printing.
Example 2: Solemn. First print was $20, second one stayed at $15 until recently.
I expect the prices to go down by $5 at most. That's still $15 per land.
Have a look at all of this year's winners for SCG comps. [http://sales.starcitygames.com/deckdatabase/deckshow.php?t%5BT2%5D=3&deck_name%5B%5D=&event_ID=&feedin=&start_date=2012-01-01&end_date=2012-07-15&city=&state=&country=&start=1&finish=1&exp=&p_first=&p_last=&simple_card_name%5B1%5D=&simple_card_name%5B2%5D=&simple_card_name%5B3%5D=&simple_card_name%5B4%5D=&simple_card_name%5B5%5D=&w_perc=0&g_perc=0&r_perc=0&b_perc=0&u_perc=0&a_perc=0&comparison%5B1%5D=%3E%3D&card_qty%5B1%5D=1&card_name%5B1%5D=&comparison%5B2%5D=%3E%3D&card_qty%5B2%5D=1&card_name%5B2%5D=&comparison%5B3%5D=%3E%3D&card_qty%5B3%5D=1&card_name%5B3%5D=&comparison%5B4%5D=%3E%3D&card_qty%5B4%5D=1&card_name%5B4%5D=&comparison%5B5%5D=%3E%3D&card_qty%5B5%5D=1&card_name%5B5%5D=&sb_comparison%5B1%5D=%3E%3D&sb_card_qty%5B1%5D=1&sb_card_name%5B1%5D=&sb_comparison%5B2%5D=%3E%3D&sb_card_qty%5B2%5D=1&sb_card_name%5B2%5D=&card_not%5B1%5D=&card_not%5B2%5D=&card_not%5B3%5D=&card_not%5B4%5D=&card_not%5B5%5D=&order_1=finish&order_2=&limit=25&action=Show+Decks]
They're definitely not dominated by combo decks because of the checks and balances of the formats. There's Force of Will, all of the best removal cards ever printed and tonnes of great hate cards like Tormod's Crypt and Gaddock Teeg. Dredge may win almost every pre-sideboard game it plays, but from there its win ratio goes way down.
Stoneblade
Rock
Aggro Loam
Junk
Maverick
Dredge
RUG Delver
Elves
Sneak and Show
RUG Delver
Sneak and Show
Reanimator
RUG Delver
Goblins
Stoneblade
Lands
Merfolk
RUG Delver
RUG Delver
UR Delver
Punishing Maverick
Burn
Burn
Dredge
UR Delver
Welder MUD
Punishing Maverick
UR Delver
Aggro Loam
Stoneblade
Blouses
Storm
Punishing Maverick
RUG Delver
RUG Delver
NO Bant
UW Control
That's all 38 comp winning decks from this year's SCG tournaments, only 12 of which are combo decks (Storm, Stoneblade, Welder, Dredge, Reanimator, Sneak and Show, Lands and Elves). What the hell are you talking about? Legacy has been really diverse lately. Legacy pro-players have been talking about how good the format is for a while now. Just yesterday Drew Levin put up this [http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/legacy/24462-M13-Overview-And-The-State-Of-Legacy.html] article. If you don't have a sub to SCG, that's fine, his evaluation of the format is in the free section of the article.
EDIT: Around 53 on the second 100 decks weren't combo. Definitely not 3/4 combo. Will check the remaining 95.
EDIT: About 49 of the last 95 decks weren't combo. Keep in mind that both this and my previous two numbers are counting any deckname I don't recognise as combo, so there's probably even more fair decks than in the numbers I've given.