Superheroes basically designed themselves over the better part of a century to keep going. I mean hell with Marvel basically all the heroes they are using have an "out" so to speak. One or two characters in the comics have taken up the mantle of the hero before them. All the studio has to do is organize the movie that finally pulls that trigger, give the old character a good bye, then set up the new character in the roll. Heck if the old actor wants to come back for a movie you can easily write him/her in. Superhero continuity is eternal and given what's coming in Avengers 3 and 4 Marvel is giving its movies the "out" to do reset to zeroes.Scarim Coral said:The only way I can see the superheroes films can be shifted to be less popular is probably a new fad (it never occur to me that Superheroes are like the new Western or horror film of this generation until Bob pointed it out) or maybe they outlived their stay, I mean how long can a contiunity can last but yet again Doctor Who is still going strong.
I liked both Daredevil and Green Lantern. The extended versions of both. The extended Daredevil is a whole lot better imo.Rituro said:*quietly* I still think Daredevil was pretty decent.
Now, Punisher, on the other hand...
This genre isn't permanent because nothing is but it is pretty much self perpetuating. There is also nothing really on the horizon to take its place. The only thing I foresee putting this thing to a stop is when video game movies finally get good. Video game movie adaptations are about the only well Hollywood hasn't successfully tapped yet. When someone does then we might see superheroes going away. I also like how you scream bias. Everyone is bias dude. Everyone. He's also a realist and he's closer to industry people than you I might imagine. He knows a little bit more about what's going on than you and I. Even from an outsider standpoint he's not really wrong.Fox12 said:I'm literally in the middle of watching a big bubble burst. It's kind of exciting.
"...It's possible that they might not."
That's how fads work, Bob. Superheros are big now, until... they're not anymore. Objects in motion tend to stay in motion? You assume that these franchises will remain popular. But, that's the thing, these markets change suddenly, and drastically. Suddenly the next genre defining Star Wars syle film will come out, and Hollywood will have a glut of superheroes that no one cares about anymore. These companies stand to lose a lot of money when this DOES happen, if they can't adapt. Other companies will adapt, and chase after the new fad, while mistakenly believing that Superheroes aren't profitable anymore. No one who found themselves in a bubble fad ever thought the gravy train would end. Then it did. Go look up Tulipomania.
This genre isn't self perpetuating, and it isn't permanent. It will probably last at least another decade, since we're in the middle of a golden age, but in the end it's a fad. Traditional narratives haven't died either. People will always want more then never ending genre installments with no nutritional value.
Your vision has been clouded by your bias, bob, but I will feel sympathetic when your Marvel films are replaced by football movies, or films about clowns fighting dinosaurs or something.
KazeAizen said:I guess I'll start by saying I wasn't trying to insult superheroes, I was just against the idea that self contained stories are somehow obsolete, or even inferior to franchises. I find that stories are much better when they have a beginning, middle, and end. I like superheroes as much as the next guy (even if I'm getting really burned out). Watchmen proved that a superhero story can be just as intelligent as any piece of fine literature. I'm not anti-superhero, just anti-franchise milking. Watchmen has all the nutrients you need grow up big, and strong, and probably a little demented.Fox12 said:snip
That said, I don't think Bob is being a realist right now. I definitely feel like he's allowed his excitement to build extremely unrealistic expectations. He likes Marvel, I get that, and I'm glad he's enjoying their success. But pretending that we're on some never ending hype train is a little silly. A new generation raised on Marvel films will eventually get bored, and go onto the next fad. That's the thing, fads change quickly, with little real warning. Then something basic about American culture shifts, and suddenly the Marvel stories aren't relevant anymore. It will be sudden, and people will move onto the next thing. It's impossible to predict, but I'd say things are set to change in a big way within the next ten years. Will superhero movies disappear? Probably not, and Marvel can always make non-superhero movies if they have to, but they certainly won't be the same draw they are now. This shift is natural, and frankly it's healthy if you want to avoid stagnation.
I personally don't see Marvel moving too far away from superheroes in terms of what they do with their movies (they may make ones which aren't focused on them, but they will always been there in the background). When the fad dies down what I think we will see is a move back to solo movies with lower budgets, it's easy to turn a profit on the international market with a movie that has a budget of 150 million.Fox12 said:Snip
I am actually hoping it will. They are going overboard with this and precious few other outings slip through the cracks. And I don't get precisely one thing about MovieBob: he keeps bashing Dark Knight Rises(which was better than the Dark Knight, a film that stopped making sense halfway through) and Man of Steel. But not Ironman 2 and 3(2 was downright atrocious), the 2 Thor films(uniteresting and frankly not weird enough, Spiderman 3 or Watchmen(which was vapid and taken down by Taxi Driver riffs and some atrocious acting).daxterx2005 said:There is such thing as too much of a good thing....
I fear this over saturation of super hero movies is going to kill the genre.