Times of not every other website spoiling major Events that you wished to experience yourself, gone.
Moviebob is right in that *main character death in a long running series* is rare. MASH for example only had one: Henry Blake.SnakeoilSage said:I know this show exists for the sake of explaining rarely-understood or little-known topics, but outside of Bob's own enjoyment of Family Guy I'm not sure how any of this is relevant to anything. Characters die all the time in every form of story-telling media you can think of. Doctor Who swaps out its main character actor every couple of years and each one of them has gone through handfuls of supporting characters, some of whom have remained famous and ubiquitous with the series as a whole despite only being around for a year or two.
But that was 2 episodes. He killed her in the first one and then she came back in the second one and killed him.... Then it was a "VR" thing and they poked fun at shows that do dream or coma plots.....vid87 said:It was a simulation chair where Stewie mapped out what would happen if he finally actually tried to kill Lois - it didn't end well, which gave the showrunners an excuse not to retread that plotline every episode like in the first seasons.rasputin0009 said:You might be right, too. I can't really remember, it's been a long time since I've watched that episode.OuendanCyrus said:I believe you're referring to the episode where the events were happening inside Stewie's "simulation goggles". But I think I might be wrong.rasputin0009 said:Quick Wikipedia search ends up with two future episodes with Brian's name. Soooo... ya.
Also, didn't Stewie "kill" Lois once? And it ended up being a bad dream in the end anyways?
You're right, but why is that an important distinction?slash2x said:But that was 2 episodes. He killed her in the first one and then she came back in the second one and killed him.... Then it was a "VR" thing and they poked fun at shows that do dream or coma plots.....
I.... I thought I was the only one....-Dragmire- said:I'm rather curious how the writers decided go about doing this. I buy the seasons mainly for the commentary however the last few seasons have had very few episodes that included commentary. Also, the people with the most overall production knowledge/ability to keep the dialogue flowing without large stretches of silence have been notably absent. It's sad but I'll probably stop buying them if they drop the commentary, especially in times like this where there is a chance to hear some unique insight about the writing decisions.
This seems unlikely since the whole point of the episode was to make Stewie complacent with the new dog.Sansha said:I think it's temporary. Bob was right here, in that the episode is hugely lackluster. And the one thing that gets me is the accident itself. The car came screaming around the corner and barreled over him in a very deliberate fashion, and the vehicle itself was unusually detailed compared to most vehicles in the show... I feel like the next episodes are going to be Stewie trying to find a way to build a time machine, and maybe an investigation into who killed him.
I'm totally on board with that!immortalfrieza said:And while Stewie is at it, go back and get the evil genius Stewie that was actually funny and enjoyable to watch and then kill the Stewie that's nothing more than a walking gay joke, in other words himself.Brockyman said:What I really hope happens is that Stewie fixes the Time Machine and goes and gets the Brian from the first 2 seasons. That Brian's dry wit and straight man gimmick was a major factor in those being the 'better seasons'. The more recent Brian is whiny, irresponsible, argumentative and unlikable in any episode other then time traveling with Stewie.
Bring Back 2000s Brian!
They had a bit of a resolution with that in the episode of the storm and brian doing drugs, but that would also probably depend on Kunis actually having a successful film career. Aside from Black Swan (which is a good movie but I suspect more known for um... other things), Ted (which could have been filled with any other woman for all the relevance her character had), and Oz The Great and Powerful (where she again had a big role but the movie wasn't really spectacular and didn't draw as much from her name as it did the brand, James Franco, and the "success" of the Wonderland movie) I cant think of a movie where she had a huge starring role and did exceptionally well with her in it and would be re-missed if she wasnt (except maybe Friends With Benefits, but again, Justin Timberlake screams more as the draw then she does/did).Mr.Mattress said:First of all, South Park is no longer on Netflix, only Hulu Plus (The South Park Movie is still on Netflix however). I know it's an older picture for Netflix but your going to confuse a lot of people.
OT, however, I was surprised they chose to kill Brian. I didn't see the episode myself, but Vinny does look ugly. I was really expecting them to kill Meg; she really doesn't do anything, everyone (in the show) hates her to some degree, and I would assume Mila Kunis would want to be focusing more on Movies rather then the show where she's a Butt Monkey.
You know what would have made a better episode? Taking about Marcia Wallace, voice of Edna Krabappel. Unlike Brian who's just another voice in Seth MacFarlane's Freakazoid-ish head, Edna Krabappel's voice actor actually tragically died, creating a real dilemma for TV and Movie-makers: what to do when your actors pass away? John Ritter, Mary Kay Bergman, this is a thousand times more interesting than some asshole choosing not to voice a talking dog in the World's Most Third Place animated Sitcom.maximara said:Moviebob is right in that *main character death in a long running series* is rare. MASH for example only had one: Henry Blake.
Also current Doctor Who is a revival of a show that begun in 1963 and in fact has made itself into the Guinness World Records as the longest-running science fiction television show. Tom Baker in fact was in the role for 7 years and that was at a time when stories were 4 episodes long.
Because this is the same thing.... An episode that leaves you with the impression that a main person from the series is dead. Then they say no just kidding the next episode.OfficialJab said:You're right, but why is that an important distinction?slash2x said:But that was 2 episodes. He killed her in the first one and then she came back in the second one and killed him.... Then it was a "VR" thing and they poked fun at shows that do dream or coma plots.....
Did he come back?slash2x said:Because this is the same thing.... An episode that leaves you with the impression that a main person from the series is dead. Then they say no just kidding the next episode.OfficialJab said:You're right, but why is that an important distinction?slash2x said:But that was 2 episodes. He killed her in the first one and then she came back in the second one and killed him.... Then it was a "VR" thing and they poked fun at shows that do dream or coma plots.....
Yeah, that didn't take very long for that problem to go away.TechTim said:hope all the haters feel real silly right about now