Well, he did add the descriptor "Militant" so I don't think he was directing it at all atheists. Though, as an agnostic myself, it's been my experience that atheists are considerably more like religious folk than they like to admit. While I've never seen atheists standing on the corner yelling (yet), they do seem eager to share their opinion in personal conversation and don't like being disagreed with, which is pretty much status quo for obnoxious religious people.mesoforte said:Atheist=/=Hating religion
Probably wasn't intentional, but the subtext was there.
Not no change. however we still define god by the three premises of power, knowledge, goodness presented presocratic. Deny that these are the three premises isn't used througout history in defining godly perfection and you really don't fit calling other people ignorant.Falseprophet said:If you seriously think there has been no change in the metaphysical perception of God from Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Philo, Origen, Tertullian, Augustine, Aquinas, Kempis, Descartes, Leibniz, Hobbes, Spinoza, Berkeley, Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Teilhard de Chardin to Marcel, then your ignorance of the history of philosophy speaks for itself.dark-amon said:Actually the philosophers have had a pretty static perception of what the term 'God' means (refering to Bobs comment on humans perception of gods changing over the course of history). The premises is actually more than 2000 years old.
Why do I mention this? Because philsophers or people with a certain degree of philosophical knowledge seem to be the only people who work on the question on higher metaphysical entities on a rational level. I rarely see anyone from any church do it and amny of the atheist community that writes books on the subject lacks knowledge on metaphysical analysis.
And about the latter half of the episode, although many younger philosophers would probably find the ideas cool, but if one where to show up everyone would sigh: "another scientolgy-church!"
What the hell does that even mean?dark-amon said:goodness presented presocratic.
we already have a diety Mobile Suit the GOD Gundam I think we can appoint Amuro as Jesus and Tomino as GodFrank_Sinatra_ said:The Church of Gundam
So who is the head honcho?
Katoki?
Tomino?
Char?
sorry, missed the -button. pre-socratic (that wich was before Socrates) there was three premises presented in the definition of divine perfection power, knowledge and goodnes. They have been used in presenting arguments on both sides of the god-argument since.Falseprophet said:What the hell does that even mean?dark-amon said:goodness presented presocratic.
This presumes that God is divinely perfect. Plato's 'god' was more of an imperfect molder of matter.dark-amon said:sorry, missed the -button. pre-socratic (that wich was before Socrates) there was three premises presented in the definition of divine perfection power, knowledge and goodnes. They have been used in presenting arguments on both sides of the god-argument since.Falseprophet said:What the hell does that even mean?dark-amon said:goodness presented presocratic.
however Platos god was not a relevant part of his philosophy. Like Aristotle the god was just an explanation in their philosophy. Religious philosophy was hardly a relevant part of philosophy before Augustine.JBrasington said:This presumes that God is divinely perfect. Plato's 'god' was more of an imperfect molder of matter.dark-amon said:sorry, missed the -button. pre-socratic (that wich was before Socrates) there was three premises presented in the definition of divine perfection power, knowledge and goodnes. They have been used in presenting arguments on both sides of the god-argument since.Falseprophet said:What the hell does that even mean?dark-amon said:goodness presented presocratic.
Yeah, but there is an unfortunate correlation between the two since we've got to defend our position all the damn time even though we're not the ones trying to prove anything other than WYSIWYG.mesoforte said:Atheist=/=Hating religion
Probably wasn't intentional, but the subtext was there.
Tony isn't so much making up for past wrongs as he is for wrongs he's committing now. =PDorian6 said:I really like this idea.
Here begins the 1st national Church of Stan and Jack (working title)
And there's no shortage of religious texts with underlying moral themes.
1. The importance of family (Fantastic 4)
2. Responsibility and sacrifice (Spider Man)
3. Accepting people regardless their differences (X-Men)
4. Repentance for past wrongs (Iron Man)
5. Humility (Thor)
I'm also partial to the Trekkie Church. It's just like Secular Humanism, but using Star trek metaphors