We are. We get nailed on both sides of the eisle.DTWolfwood said:gnostic church is a good one. too bad they are probably seen as heretics at this point
We are. We get nailed on both sides of the eisle.DTWolfwood said:gnostic church is a good one. too bad they are probably seen as heretics at this point
I have an even more revolutionary idea: Why don't we try not to follow at all.MovieBob said:[...] what we if we tried following without necessarily believing[...]
*dodges the thrown coins*Eri said:He sure can but that doesn't make it right. I don't care one way or the other, just throwing my 2 cents.Rainboq said:Oh be quiet, he can pronounce it however he pleases.Captain Pooptits said:Haarooohee, Bob? Haarooheee?
You just lost all nerd credibility with me. Stop your preaching now. Right now goddam.
It's Haruhi ffs.
OT: I was laughing so hard at the end, good one Bob!
Here's the thing though - There will never be a "Church of Spider Man" or stuff like that. Wonna know why? Because nobody will ever actually believe in Spider Man's divinity. Yeah, this is something of a major point in religion - gods actually having something divine in them. Sure sure, Bob suggests the whole super-heroes thing as closer to gnosticism, but it's still just a laughable concept. One thing that really bugs me is when people say "Man religion is just X". No it's not just X. It's a lot more, it's an absurdly complex concept like a lot of things in human culture.thublihnk said:Actually that was a pretty accurate take on religion... Just because it's not yours doesn't mean it's not right.Jenx said:Ah, a wonderful video in which Bob shows he has no idea how the hell religion and mythology works. Aside from that, it was a pretty fun watch.
Multiple people coming together to 'worship' and follow the ideals of a figure, be it believed fictional or real, is the basic cornerstone of religious thinking.
Wikipdia said:...while the "X" comes from the Greek letter Chi, which is the first letter of the Greek word Χριστός, translated as "Christ".
I don't think he meant that we should follow like a bunch of blind sheep but rather to take what some of these religious text say and think of it more like advice. When we take advice our decisions aren't made for us because the final decision will always be ours to make.Caliostro said:I have an even more revolutionary idea: Why don't we try not to follow at all.
We're constantly misguidedly claiming some sort of intellectual superiority to farm animals but we still can't get over the damn herd mentality.
Why follow? You know who's always following? People who are never leading. People who can't see past the leader because he's always in front, leading the way.
I know, I know. Following is comfortable. It's reassuring. It takes the weight of responsibility from off our shoulders, placing it in the reassuring figure of a, generally, charismatic leader. Following is easy. You don't have to think, you don't have to consider your options, you don't have to live with the decisions and choices knowing you, and you alone are to blame for whatever good or bad came from them, and you can just pull a blanket over your eyes and divert whatever issues arise to the guy in front.
But it's also a trap. You're letting someone else run your life. And these people don't have a magic 8-ball or the power of clairvoyance anymore than you do.
You know what happens when you follow? You never learn the way yourself. Any way.
My suggestion is to stop following entirely. Think for yourselves, and criticize everything. EVERYTHING. No exceptions.