Polytheistic pantheons of Gods actually developed around similar times to monotheism (Zoroastrianism)
Jedi is the same as agnostic, which was the point.
Hindiusm is way ahead of you Bob. Hinduism has no dogma or blasphemy, it is aware that its gods are just folklore tales which it uses to represent the metaphysics of its religion, and a way of communicating ethics and metaphysical understandings of the universe.
Agnosticism means: without knowledge. And so Thomas Huxley was almost right when he coined the term, but where he called it a ?method of sceptical, evidence-based inquiry? I believe that Agnosticism is the acceptance of absolute ignorance, and the dismissal of the question "Do you believe in God?" rather than just an answer to it or the passing over of it in silence. We must dismiss it, not ignore it.
I propose we dismiss the question for only a while. Philosophers have attempted to come up with a rational argument for God. But first there are number of propositions that we must fulfil first. As Wittgenstein said ?Philosophy is like trying to open a safe with a combination lock: each little adjustment of the dials seems to achieve nothing, only when everything is in place does the door open.?
Therefore we need:
1) The definition of God
2) The discovery of rationalism absent of science.
3) Ignore the ?burden of proof? question. The answer is "Everyone."
4) Accept that Atheism is not a scientific position, and should not dismiss the possibility of God. What it must do is continue to discredit the claims of religions. Dismissing the possibility of God needs another name.
5) Accept that we are all agnostic. And that there is no difference between us as we are all equally ignorant and all have the same objective, which is the truth. From this we must then accept Hegel and his approach to knowledge.
(Student of philosophy.)- Oh and if anyone wants an explanation for why we're all agnostics, I have an explanation if you really care.