The Big Picture: Once Upon a Time in The Future

sagacious

New member
May 7, 2009
484
0
0
Dear Bob, I would also Pick Cities on mars over World Peace.

If God and Free Will both exist, then there is nothing man nor even God can do to bring about world peace so long as there are those who aren't willing to accept that people are people, and that we should work together, rather than killing each other (I'm not saying disarm, there will always be a place for defense forces)

Putting cities on Mars? That's a job that is totally doable.

I'm a realist, and the fact is that World Peace is more in the realm of fiction than putting cities on Mars is.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Bad move America, looks like it's up to Britian and the space S.A.S. to discover Prothean technology on mars. Don't worry, we'll share the discovery... for a price.
What makes it worse is that I live in Space City Houston....T_T I get the crap end of History!!

Secondly I'm willing to support any other country as well to be our successor in forms of Space travel and colonization.

Thirdly, Way to go Bob, you are a very brave man for showing your true colors and not hiding behind a fake personality. I applaud you and agree with you to quite the extent.
 

Steve the Pocket

New member
Mar 30, 2009
1,649
0
0
Heads-up, this is a long post with a lot of quotes. Apologies to everyone who's getting this whole thing in their inbox and has to hunt for their post; it was either that, or make a half-dozen different posts, or learn when to keep my mouth shut. This seemed to be the best option.

MovieBob said:
...when we finally make do First Contact, the aliens won't be met by a respectable starship crewed by a cross-section of the very best humanity have to offer, but instead will come upon the U.S.S. Mountain Dew, crewed by a cross-section of human worthlessness picked by some damn reality show.
OK, Bob, I know you were being sarcastic and all, but that. Sounds. Like. The premise. Of the best. Sci-fi. Comedy. Ever. Seriously. I was toying around with the idea of creating a sci-fi comedy show reminiscent of Red Dwarf or something, but I was kind of stuck for a premise. Not anymore. I'll be sure to get in touch if it ever goes anywhere, see if we can work something out.

Darth Sea Bass said:
I'm not even american and i'm pissed off that america has canned the shuttle! How as a species are we gonna advance without pushing ourselves to explore and colonize space?
You seem to have missed either the point of the video or the less on how space travel works. Or both. It's not just that they canceled the shuttle program; it's that they canceled the stuff that was set to replace it. We can't very well fly to Mars or colonize planets in other solar systems in the Space Shuttle. ;)

flying_whimsy said:
Arguably, the internet has been ground zero for everything awesome over the last twenty year: nearly instant dissemination of information across class and geopolitical boundaries and what do we do with it? porn, WoW, and facebook.

Humanity epic fail.
Wow... This is probably the most poignant thing I've read in ages. I really don't know what to say.

Orcboyphil said:
I'm with Bob here but not just for the ohh wow where finally here reason (Though it is a frikkin large part of it). The choice isan't really feed the starving or go to Mars; its go to Mars and the technology that will be necessary to create a viable colony will also be the technology that improves the lot for the poor people of Earth.
I'm not so sure anymore. It seems to me that all the technology we'd need in order to go to Mars already exists, because technology has been improving on its own since it was created for the original space program. Feel free to prove me wrong though.

Falseprophet said:
There's one very important reason to keep funding space research. If a couple of decades from now, we find a Near Earth Object [http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/] in real danger of impacting with the Earth, wouldn't you rather have something in place to address it? Or would you rather put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye?
You know all them nukes we've still got stored up? The ones that the U.S. supply of alone could blow up a whole Earth-sized planet and then some? Yeah, I think we've got a pretty good fighting chance. Now, making sure we still have enough people on watch that we'll see it coming, that's another matter, but if things ever get so bad that NASA loses that much funding, there's a good chance we'll have bigger things to worry about.

JUMBO PALACE said:
I feel like this show is just giving Bob an outlet to yell about things.
I think he more or less said that was the point in the first episode.

Squarez said:
If the EU united as one single country, we could probably easily get a decent space program running, maybe one that could surpass NASA. But alas, people are too proud to admit that united we stand, divided we fall and the British would want to stay British and the French would want to stay French etc instead of just being European.
And you would all speak, what, Esperanto? Also keep in mind that so far, nobody's proven that a country that big and that densely populated can work. Including the U.S., which from the looks of things is on its way to proving that it can't.
 

Mr.Mattress

Level 2 Lumberjack
Jul 17, 2009
3,645
0
0
You know what's actually more realistic then colonizing Mars right now? Making a Space Colony. Basically, build a giant metal orb that can house thousands of people, put them in, and basically send it to space as are first non-earth colony (Basically, it'd be a giant Satellite). That is realistic, we should try that first.

OT: Nice video. I don't think I'd pick the same as you (Peace will eventually bring Space Colonies, ever thought of that?), but I won't judge. Space Colonies are awesome.
 

Harrowdown

New member
Jan 11, 2010
338
0
0
Believe me Bob, i'd love to see humanity move out into space. Even without the laser guns and freaky blue aliens, the thought of an actual colony on another planet just makes me burn with excitement. Times are tough, though. Economic downturn, etc. Maybe it just isn't practical right yet. :(
 

crazypsyko666

I AM A GOD
Apr 8, 2010
393
0
0
I thought it would be pretty cool terraforming mars. Hey, here's another idea, though. We've been talking for ages about finding a new planet, one that could support life, and we've finally found it. Not only that, it's 20 lightyears away. I realize how insanely far that is, but that's actually ridiculously close in the broad spectrum. In space terms, that would mean it's in our neighborhood. A short bike ride away. In addition, Swiss scientists are actually capturing dark matter for longer and longer periods of time. To top it off, no, I don't think we should send people. What we could do, however, is use signals imprinted in this dark matter to control robotics, things to explore those places. Hell, within a few centuries we could be talking about seeing the new earth, same gravity and everything.

Does that make you feel better, Bob?

I don't actually think colonization within our solar system is really very plausible, given gravitational differences and and the like, but this could be the big thing. Also, look to India for everything scientific from now on. They're the new big players.
 

Azaraxzealot

New member
Dec 1, 2009
2,403
0
0
i love your shows and you're a great film critic and mostly cool guy, but as for this? shut up bob. we dont have the money and we should REALLY divert our funds to more pressing matters.
like health care reform?
or relieving poverty?
or paying off our debts to china? (we really should do this instead of paying attention to something that MIGHT happen)
the list goes on...

seriously, don't be so mad over something so small.
 

xaszatm

That Voice in Your Head
Sep 4, 2010
1,146
0
0
To be honest, I'm surprised with the idea that space exploration is either a pointless or useless endeavorer. The funny thing about science is that in the pursuit of one goal, many other things can be found as a result. Take NASA's original plan to go to the moon. Did the plan in it self have any real value to the public. Asides from a great feeling of accomplishment... no, not really. But look how we live thanks to the program itself. According to the NASA website, Insulation, the Jaws of Life, Satellite TV, GPS systems, LED technology, Laser Heart Surgery, and many other things were created BECAUSE of the space program. The technology that was used to make the impossibility of space exploration possible is now used as both a recreational and vital (especially if you live where it gets cold) parts in our lives.

So if space exploration to Mars happens, just imagine what in could mean for us as mankind. Sure, there is no real tangible purpose to launch a man to Mars (other than the bragging rights), but there will be things that will help mankind. Maybe the engines they create for the project will be seen in our vehicles. Maybe the constant studying on engines in space will finally result in the coming of an affordable hovercraft. Maybe the Gundam will finally be created! ...alright, that last one probably won't happen, but you get my point. Space exploration will help society as a whole, but not directly.

Another thing that I really don't like about the comments, including Moviebob's video, is the idea that we have to choose between science and social problems. I can understand economic problems being the more important but NEWSFLASH, there were poor, starving people when we landed on the moon. To believe that before we take off to Mars, we must end world hunger and find world peace to me seems ridiculous.

Sorry for the long post and for any grammatic mistakes in this comment.
 

Ertol

New member
Jul 8, 2010
327
0
0
I'm with you Bob, one of my greatest wishes is to live to see colonies on other planets and actually be able to live on one. I hope at least one country continues their space program.
 

MajoraPersona

New member
Aug 4, 2009
529
0
0
Silly question: What happens to the air, water, and assorted materials used in the creation of a spacecraft if it breaks down in space?
 

Rabidkitten

New member
Sep 23, 2010
143
0
0
In all fairness, manned space exploration is both impractical and doesn't yield much in terms of data. Sure it helped push rocket science further, but past that space exploration, and the information we get out of it isn't reliant on manned flights. Spirit and Opportunity, the Hubble Telescope, are examples of what robotic technology can gain us in space exploration. And for the time being, and probably many a century moving forward realistically we need to be exploring space with instruments. We don't have to actually set foot there to explore space. I know the idea is nice and all, but it just isn't practical at the moment. Our tech isn't there, so in the mean time we can explore space fully with robots, and deep space telescopes which are far more important then putting hairless monkeys in space. While we can focus those funds here on earth to make technologies that will put humanity in a position to effectively achieve such goals when the time is ready. And pray we find the aliens before they find us, a resource rich planet with a semi advanced species, is prime for the pickings.
 

diablomaki

New member
Jul 17, 2009
132
0
0
i watch your movie reviews and your game overthinker stuff, but you didnt think this through and you didnt research this very well. also you have other people jumping on your coat-tails and they surely didnt do their research either. not enough of these responses are intelligent(though some are). i am very disappointed at the( ... dare I say) immaturity of this video, it makes me sad. keep your content value at its previous levels, please and thank you.
 

wammnebu

New member
Sep 25, 2010
628
0
0
ithink nasa has been a waste of money, but dont you see it is their fault that space exploration has been falling. They have spent billions of dollars getting absolutely nowhere for 20years, and we are supposed to just let them continue to pigeeonhole our hopes and dreams in an unceasing beaurocracy. Maybe the cut of the spaceshittle and threats of budget cuts will put nasa back into gear
 

Bathyscaphe

New member
Mar 2, 2010
2
0
0
As someone about to start on a career in Astrophysics I'll be damned if I let the opportunity for advancing space exploration go out with a whimper.

Thanks Bob. It's good to know that people with a voice in the media care about this.
 

Squarez

New member
Apr 17, 2009
719
0
0
Steve the Pocket said:
Squarez said:
If the EU united as one single country, we could probably easily get a decent space program running, maybe one that could surpass NASA. But alas, people are too proud to admit that united we stand, divided we fall and the British would want to stay British and the French would want to stay French etc instead of just being European.
And you would all speak, what, Esperanto? Also keep in mind that so far, nobody's proven that a country that big and that densely populated can work. Including the U.S., which from the looks of things is on its way to proving that it can't.
Well it's only been working for the past 300 years, so I'd say it was doing okay.
 

UmbralRaptor

New member
Feb 1, 2010
9
0
0
The future already happened, but we collectively decided that we'd rather use lasers to play music and buy things, rather than launch rockets and perhaps shoot people. The same sort of thing applies to most-any other technology you wish to name. Hence why it's easy to know all about the latest iThing, but SpaceX's Falcon 9 launch, and work on their Dragon capsule can easily slip by unnoticed.

The individual is not the group, so this may prove highly frustrating.
 

MrhalfAwake

New member
Nov 17, 2010
125
0
0
matrix3509 said:
MrhalfAwake said:
There's nothing in space, even with all out satellites all we really need to focus on is our own immediate orbit, when i can barely afford a game once a month Im not gonna feel sympathetic for an online critic whose made because we're not going to emulate his favorite book or movies.

There is nothing to be gained from space that would as of right now justify the cost of going there. At all.


So assuring the continuation of the human species isn't worth the cost? Wow. Only someone with absolutely no knowledge of science would say that there is nothing to be gained from space.
If we can't assure our immediate needs are met how in the hell do you expect to meet our long term needs.