The Big Picture: Pink Is Not The Problem

Recommended Videos

Spearmaster

New member
Mar 10, 2010
378
0
0
All I get from this video is that Bob is unhappy with the current idealized gender oppression, whats his alternative? is it to replace it with his own idealized gender oppression proclaiming that it is more right in some way without even a shred of reason other than he has the vision and temerity?

Nobody take this the wrong way but Adolf Hitler had lots of vision and temerity and he did a lot of bending.

People need to stop insisting their personal ideals are superior to any others, just live YOUR life, be an example, not an oppressor, the world would be a better place and if enough people truly feel the same way then the world will change on its own.
 

Sotanaht

New member
Mar 6, 2008
70
0
0
I'm thinking that his point about villains being coded female is opposite the issue. I think what you see in something like Hunger Games is less villains being evil because of female coding and more about female coding being applied to negative traits like vanity, hedonism and excess. Nothing wrong about using obviously negative traits to characterize an obviously bad guy, the problem is actually about people calling those traits feminine.
 

Ghostknightxii

New member
Jun 13, 2013
7
0
0
*SPOILER ALERT* If u have not read the followup article to his review on Frozen, disregard this following paragraph.

Has anyone noticed that in Frozen, the main antagonist actually portrays male archetypes that are generally associated as being "good"? And is probably why it is such an effective twist near the end. I know Bob didn't mention it directly but i'm willing to bet dollars to donuts it is what got the hamster turning in his head.
 

m64

New member
May 12, 2010
12
0
0
This episode sounds largely like a distraction tactic. "Here's a much bigger issue, so this small issue here does not matter." Yes, Bob, I agree that using feminine traits to mark something evil is a horrible and perhaps even more insidious trend. But this does not change the fact that forcing women into stereotypes right from their childhood is bad too and way too widespread to be tolerated. I don't want my daughter to consider her femininity bad, but I also don't want her to cap her life ambitions at "husband, kids and a well kept house" because that's what her toys and kid's movies told her she should aspire to.
 

Darmani

New member
Apr 26, 2010
231
0
0
That's what ALL toys aspire to with the side effect of "kill bad guys along way" more for boys *sometimes.* Both inspire people to be the best. Barbie is into sports people! So is Princess PEach. Guys quest to save their girlfriends to be with them happily ever after and etc. Its adult and more seeming stories that expand. Hell forget gay relationships growing up I was annoyed it seemed being SINGLE or NOT PARENTS was unthinkable and empty or at least not as explored or celebrated. Even with my interest in guys my interest in people and personal interaction has oscillated like mad.
 

nuttshell

New member
Aug 11, 2013
201
0
0
Farther than stars said:
I'm British, but that's besides the point.
I allready explained to another poster here, that I didn't mean to undermine your argument. I shouldve deleted your name and post number in the first place, sorry.

If certain practices, such as men wearing lipstick, are accepted in other parts of the world, then that's great for those other parts of the world, but that still leaves us with the problem that they're not universally accept in the West.
It's beginning to change. If you remember the Grunge and Metal movement, you will notice that since then, long hair with men was quickly growing popular. Eyeshadow and stylish hair have grown popular with the Emo movement.

As to the point on women dominating cosmetics, I'm missing a link. How exactly does 'men being a larger part of the workforce' lead to 'women becoming more involved with cosmetics'?
Because women simply had enough time to do it and didn't need to maintain a practical approach to body care. Especially the idea of the "American Dream", envisioned a family in which the man provides at work/war and the woman breeds more children for work/war.

So why is it specifically here that the cosmetics industry has developed so exponentially?
Because the west doesn't have wars in it. The wars, the west fights are fought oversees. The people at home live fairly protected, fairly rich lives. There are also other factors here, like the entertaining industry benefiting the cosmetic industry.
 

clearasmoonlight

New member
Nov 22, 2013
4
0
0
There's a lot of discussion of the gender binary going on in this thread, a lot of which is really interesting. But while binary transgender people have been mentioned, I've noticed that no one has mentioned genderqueer people yet. Being genderqueer/non-binary-gendered myself, I thought I would mention that people like me exist, and that we can perhaps be taken as more evidence towards the gender binary being more of a social construct than something hardwired into human biology.

First of all, a primer for anyone who's unfamiliar with the term "genderqueer": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genderqueer

And a couple more for anyone who's unclear on the idea of gender identity versus gender expression: https://www.genderspectrum.org/understanding-gender (Scroll down to the "Gender Terminology" section for the definitions.)

For me, being genderqueer means that I don't identify as either male or female. Because of that, I definitely think of my gender as separate from my biological sex -- those two things don't match up for me, and never have. That has led me to experience to what's generally called gender dysphoria these days. Basically, it's a feeling that the sex of my physical body doesn't fit with how I feel as a person on the inside. This is an issue that affects the majority of trans* spectrum people, including many genderqueer people.

I'll use some anecdotes to try to illustrate what I'm talking about, since I know this is a strange concept for most people who've never questioned their own gender. When I was a kid, I didn't feel like either a little girl or a little boy. I didn't prefer to play with either girls or boys and didn't really understand why I was supposed to dislike and stop playing with the opposite sex when I reached the age where that became a thing. I played with a pretty wide variety of toys, but tended to avoid anything that felt to me very masculine or feminine -- e.g. playing team sports and playing with dolls had equally low appeal for me. For as long as I can remember, I dreamed of being able to shapeshift so that I wouldn't have to always be the sex I was born as -- so that I wouldn't always been seen as being a girl or a boy 100% of the time. I wanted to be able to switch back and forth, or, best of all, not have to be either.

When I hit puberty and my body started to develop secondary sex characteristics, I absolutely hated it. I hated that I was now much more obviously one sex and not the other, and began to really loathe my body for the way it was changing. (I'm still working through a lot of those issues, but things are slowly getting better now that I at least have a word to describe my gender identity.) But the idea of switching to the opposite sex and being treated as the opposite gender has never seemed like it would be a real escape for me. It doesn't matter whether people are reading and treating me as male for female: in either case, they're probably going to make a lot of assumptions about how a man or a woman "should" behave, unconsciously ascribe those assumptions to me, and possibly treat me negatively for the ways in which I don't live up to them. (This is what's often called "behaviour policing" -- e.g., "You can't wear makeup and like stuffed animals! You're a man!" and "You can't have a buzz cut and work as a mechanic! You're a woman!" Though it's often not that overt. A real-life example I encountered recently is an older transgender woman I was talking to recently, who firmly believes that any transgender woman who goes out without full makeup and her hair done perfectly is "making [trans* women] look bad". To me, all of those feel like specious arguments without any basis in anything except (Western, in my case) cultural constructs. Why do we see these things as inherently masculine and feminine in the first place? And why do so many people seem invested in making sure that people don't express a gender that is considered different from their biological sex? I haven't yet been able to find a convincing reason for why these unspoken rules exist, except, essentially tradition (aka, "but it's always been that way!") And I'm always reluctant to accept tradition as a valid reason for things remaining as they currently are.)

About ten years ago, I finally came across the term "genderqueer" online, and it was an epiphany for me. "So there are other people out there who don't identify as either male or female? It's not just that I'm a freak, or terrible at being the gender I'm "supposed" to be? And I don't have to decide to be the opposite gender just because I'm not comfortable with my current one? Awesome!" It's been a long road, but these days I'm finally out as genderqueer to my friends and family (some of whom are even being wonderful enough to start calling me "they" rather than "he" or "she"), and I'm working on getting my gender expression more in line with my identity. (It's a discovery process, but it's really empowering to finally feel like I can ignore the people who try to tell me that the way I look makes me a bad example of my binary gender. Because I don't have a binary gender, so hah, your criticism means nothing to me anymore!) Probably needless to say at this point, I feel strongly that the gender binary is far more a social construct that something hardwired into the human brain. Otherwise, it seems unlikely that people like me would even exist -- and we definitely do.

So there's my two cents from outside the binary. I hope it's a helpful contribution to the discussion. If anyone has questions, please feel free to ask. I'm generally not easy to offend.
 

InvisibleMan

New member
Mar 26, 2009
93
0
0
Ronack said:
The thing about The Hunger Games is that it isn't coded Male and Female, but rather Rich and Poor. It's a commentary on our modern society. Just look at what the Rich are wearing, ffs. Those looks are straight from some designers runway. Butt ugly and expensive as fuck, but the rich still buy it because rich. Whilst the poor need to work their ass off to survive, having to fight against the system by the rich in the meantime.
Agreed... "Remember who the real enemy is" refers to the rich, not the effeminate.
 

generals3

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,197
0
0
Specter Von Baren said:
Okay, I haven't watched the video, and I don't want to watch the video because I'm sick of Bob drum beating this issue. I just want to comment on all the people just nodding their heads with an argument he made that feminine is seen as evil... What the fudge media have any of you been freaking watching for the last 20 years?! You're going to just look at The Penguin in Batman while ignoring Killer Croc? I don't even feel like listing off more examples, this should be flipping obvious to every single person here! Even in DBZ, Frieza's final form at full power is super muscular and testosterone filled. Is there something that's in the video that people aren't talking about here?
And let's not forget that ultimately if it's true that media affect people they shot their own arguments in the foot. Indeed who are people the most afraid of? Male strangers or female strangers? If masculinity was always associated with "good" and "femininity" with "evil" than people would always walk over to the other side of the street when there is a group of women!

And yeah... what kind of media do people to watch to actually come to the conclusion they're portraying femininity as evil? I've watched a buttload of action movies which involve "villains" and the vast majority of them are manly men. But I guess exceptions make the rule if it makes a point?
 

HappyRat

New member
May 13, 2013
5
0
0
A dozen or so mentions of the pink aisle and no pony references? Hmmm, color me mildly surprised. Not upset, just surprised.

I'm really impressed with Bob on this. Usually his sociopolitical rants are just skimmed from Reddit and very SJW type stuff, but this shows a deep understanding of the complexity of the issue at hand, and even how some of the exterior forces trying to change it are causing reinforcing unintended consequences. That kind of clarity on ANY issue would be awesome. People are jerks. Blame people. Hello Kitty isn't intrinsically gay. Pressure cookers aren't intrinsically WMDs.

Kudos bob, kudos.

I will say though, that while the gay villain trope is still strong and kicking, and while this was mostly a jab at The Hunger Games, there are plenty of counterexamples. In The Fifth Element, Ruby Rod is undeniably effeminate (despite being a shock jock who hits on women), even screaming in falsetto like a woman at times, but he is not a villain, in fact he and testosmacho Bruce Willis team up through much of the third act together, playing off each other like it's a buddy-cop film. While the real villains are an evil star, Gary Oldman as a lame semi-effeminate arms dealer with a southern draw and shape-shifting lame-brained muscular alien orc types.

I'm sure that's not the only example, but the first I could think of.
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
Magenera said:
... and if one believes that you can shift one culture to a different culture like a puzzle piece and have that fit nicely then you are going to be wrong.
Which is why feminism and other movements within these matters need to be constantly brought up and discussed. That way we'll be able to bring a gradual societal change over many years towards a better and more equal future.
 

generals3

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,197
0
0
Strawman McFallacy said:
The fact that masculinity is tied to things like aggression is probably why people would fear a guy. But yes, I agree MovieBob doesn't, and never really does, know what he's talking about.

It's less that those feminine traits are seen as evil but more that they are seen as lesser. It's why a girl can be given the thumbs up if she's playing with say toy power tools because she's so tough. However a boy playing with a tea set, that's feminine so he's a wimp. And yeah, there are some camp villains, Maybe Loki could be seen as feminine, I'm not sure if it's a huge trend though. EDIT: I'd actually say the film version of Iron Man is fairly effinant. He cares about his looks, about having lots of money about having lots of things, he cares about partying, and he has much less machismo than the rest of the Avengers cast and he's the favourite.

MovieBob seems to blame this trend on people trying to break down gender barriers, but those people also created the gender neutral easy bake oven so I'm not sure who this video is addressed too.

Well with the "inferior" part I think it really depends on the type of movie. In an action movie it is true masculinity is presented as being "better" but that's because it kind of has to. Action heroes usually rely on stubbornness and strength to accomplish their mission and these two are typically male traits. A typically "feminine" action hero would be one who'd be victorious through diplomacy and compromise but at that point the "action" part of the movie would kind of disappear. On the other hand if you start looking at less action oriented movies it starts getting more blurry. In some movies it is true femininity is portrayed as lesser (shallow, irrational, etc.) but at the same time in others femininity is portrayed as being "the voice of reason". So personally I really don't think we can make media-wide claims about the portrayal of gender-traits because there doesn't seem to be a general rule.

And I personally never associated Loki with "feminine". Just a self-centered ambitious backstabbing narcissist. And while caring about looks is typically feminine caring about money isn't so with iron man it's kind of a mixed character too. He's actually quite macho in certain ways (in others not).
 

WarpZone

New member
Mar 9, 2008
423
0
0
MovieBob said:
Pink Is Not The Problem

MovieBob takes on the gender stereotyping our society dabbles in.

Watch Video
Interesting.

You know, Bob, one of the strongest feminists I know recently wrote a thingy in which the bad guy, a devil-analogue named Sentinel, was portrayed a vaguely effeminate man. I don't know that I'd describe him as mincing. But he was, by design, erudite, well-spoken, impeccably dressed, and very beautiful. He was also unspeakably cruel and subtle enough at leading his victims on to get away with it. The author told me (and I hope I'm not butchering this too badly,) that while the main inspiration for him was a CD she had listened to that she really liked and her own ingrained-during-her-formative-years mistrust of traditionally "pretty" people, a lot of the minor details were informed by classical literature and storytelling tropes.

This was all coming from somebody who has a massive body of work depicting everything from fat chicks to dragon-kin to gay couples holding hands. I mean, just look at some of this stuff: http://discountbinninja.deviantart.com/gallery/ This is not the art of somebody with a vested interest in mainstream ideals of beauty!

I guess what I'm saying is, it's been my experience that sometimes they don't make the bad guy effeminate because they're trying to enforce an outdated gender stereotype. Sometimes they portray the bad guy, male or female, as sleazy, manipulative, menacing, wealthy and sneaky because those are good qualities for a villain to have.

I'm not saying your breakdown of Xerxes is flawed (especially given his counterpart Leonidas, who definitely does not resemble the heroine in my friend's tale, nor her love-interest,) just that it'd be really hard to write a movie where Draco Malfoy saves an orphanage from Superman. (No, Dr. Horrible doesn't count. It was a deliberate subversion for comedy's sake.)

I guess what I'm saying is, do you think it's reasonable to say that some of Xerxes's traits could be legitimately used to signal "Villain" in a work where their motive for being there has nothing to do with outdated concepts of masculinity and femininity, and instead just used to signal "this is a sneaky person who doesn't mean it when he smiles?"

Cruella Deville and Jafar are basically the same character from a method-acting perspective. At some point, doesn't it make sense to stop saying that Jafar talks and acts the way he does because they're trying to make him look gay, and start saying that he just talks and acts the way he does because it's creepy and off-putting and unnerving?

Or would we need to make up a whole lot of ground in terms of equality and civility and equal rights and not-being-judgemental-towards-queer-folk before the playing field is level enough to even support an argument like the one I just made?

(Please try and respond to this if you see it. I really do want to know if it's fair to call each of Xerxes's traits "stuff," neither good nor evil except depending on context.)

Thanks for another great episode, and for fighting the good fight against sexism.
 

GamerFromJump

New member
Sep 28, 2009
65
0
0
I always played as Peach in Mario 2, and now in Super Mario 3D World, because her ability made her the best characters in most situations.

Also relevant was the statement from Bryan Konietzko during the development of The Legend of Korra: "Conventional TV wisdom has it that girls will watch shows about boys, but boys won't watch shows about girls. During test screenings, though, boys said they didn't care that Korra was a girl. They just said she was awesome."


Make a good character, and gender becomes unimportant/less important.
 

Do4600

New member
Oct 16, 2007
934
0
0
shephardjhon said:
Do4600 said:
Or we could all just buy our toys from manufacturers who have never associated gender roles with their toys? You know, companies that have always deserved our business?
shephardjhon said:
So we associate feminine with bad yet can't have female villains. Even the ones mentioned are retroactively turned into good guys.
What about
Ugh, I chills just from looking at her.
I don't know who she is or her movie.
Your loss friend. The film is called Ran, it's directed by Akira Kurosawa and was released in 1985. Incredible film.
 

mindfaQ

New member
Dec 6, 2013
194
0
0
This presentation had some good points in it imo - our own history sometimes has bigger impact on our lives than we might want to admit and it takes time to throw away some ballast.
 

Elf Defiler Korgan

New member
Apr 15, 2009
980
0
0
MovieBob said:
Pink Is Not The Problem

MovieBob takes on the gender stereotyping our society dabbles in.

Watch Video
Nicely done. You just created a resource for first years in uni and the gender week in an intro sociology class.

Well done.
 

Elf Defiler Korgan

New member
Apr 15, 2009
980
0
0
GamerFromJump said:
I always played as Peach in Mario 2, and now in Super Mario 3D World, because her ability made her the best characters in most situations.

Also relevant was the statement from Bryan Konietzko during the development of The Legend of Korra: "Conventional TV wisdom has it that girls will watch shows about boys, but boys won't watch shows about girls. During test screenings, though, boys said they didn't care that Korra was a girl. They just said she was awesome."


Make a good character, and gender becomes unimportant/less important.
Yeah. You may also want to watch the lead Balsa in Moribito.
 

hexFrank202

New member
Mar 21, 2010
303
0
0
I like your societal commentary SO much better when it's clearly inspired by topical relevance or a philosophical discovery, and the video resulting has this positive, upbeat, encouraging energy... than when it's clearly coming from anger and a bit of bitterness, like someone pissed you off about the subject that morning.

You're (slowly) getting a lot better being nice and positive about everything to your fans, Bob. Keep it up!
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
Magenera said:
Helmholtz Watson said:
MovieBob said:
Where is "natural order" then, other than where it belongs - bent to will of those with the vision and temerity to do the bending?
And who's will should it be bent towards? Who gets to do the bending? Do only people with Western Liberal values get to do this, or is it free to everybody, including people who don't have western values? Do they have the right to bend the will to their vision, or is this "bending of will" a right that only occidental countries are allowed to have?

I only ask because too often it seems like some people are more than happy in wanting to mimic Mao Zedong's[footnote]To clarify, I'm not saying that people want to mimic Mao's violence towards innocent people, just his attitude towards traditional Chinese culture.[/footnote] "relationship" with traditional Chinese culture, by come up with their own "four olds" and supporting the idea of a Cultural Revolution(red guards and all). What about those of us that don't support this cultural revolution, and those of us that don't agree on what should be considered the "four olds"?
So funny that you mention that. My Chinese teacher mention that the ridding of tradition ended up screwing them over as they ended up losing part of their own culture and identity, and now partly have to rely on Taiwan to bring back part of the culture that was lost. Funny enough it's ridding of the old just because it's old, and the belief that it can't accommodate every person and culture with out the irony that their system what ever it is would be the same. Some of the norms that was developing has done more to shit on femininity than any misogynist has ever done. Hell there was a discussion that was brought in about a women choice to not follow the ideals of feminist and that was brought out as impossible.
I know tone is sometimes hard to tell the tone of a comment on the internet, so let me just say that my following sentence is genuine and not meant to be dismissive, condescending, or combative.
I'm confused as to what you are trying to say about my comment to MovieBob, other than the fact that I brought up China and you have a Chinese teacher. Again, I'm not trying to be rude, but I'm kind of lost as to what the point of your response is.

Magenera said:
Honestly the only thing people ever get right is Gender being a social construct based on region, social, biological, and language, which means culture, and if one believes that you can shift one culture to a different culture like a puzzle piece and have that fit nicely then you are going to be wrong. Like putting on make up considered feminine here, but on other parts of the world it is masculine, but that doesn't mean one can shove on group norms to another and say it's all good.
So then....you agree with me that "Western Liberal values" are not the only (for a lack of better words) "good option" when deciding on how to bend the will of a culture?