Tyler Perry? Oh LURD!!!
I can't wait to go see the Thor movie and I honestly don't know why I haven't yet
I can't wait to go see the Thor movie and I honestly don't know why I haven't yet
I agree 100%. Some characters are simply rooted in their ethnic identity, as much as we would like to claim that they are not. Indiana Jones, as a character, would be a completely different person were he black, not because of acting style or surface looks, but because of the life experiences that character would have had as a black person over a white person.chaos order said:there have also been instances where a race swap to a white person has taken away from unique characters that fall into different ethnicities. foe example, the dragon ball movie where goku is white. The last airbender could have had both unique inuit and asian characters. (although i did like how the fire nation where brown lolDearFilm said:So according to Bob, embracing double standards is the only real way to treat our popular culture's derth of interesting or complex minority characters. So changing a Norse god's race was preferable to creating a new character who is black. Thor had an entire Earth-based realm that was set in modern day America, and yet it was less culturally diverse than Asgard.
This strikes me as a kind of racism in and of itself. It is as though you do not trust minorities or those who write them to create a new and unique character on their own, so you have to "gift" them characters who have already been created. You are allowing them to "prove" their racial equity only through the appropriation of another race's character. It's like if a black African chef wanted to prove his worth in a French kitchen, but rather than let him make his own recipe, gave him a recipe already perfected by a white French cook. This betrays an astounding amount of condescention on the part of anyone who argues this way.
Honestly, some characters can be changed and can benefit from said change in the long run. I think Spider-Man as a young black kid from Queens makes a lot of sense and could be interesting because this is the real world, and that character is set to reflect modern ideas and experience. A Norse god, however, seems to resist this change. Instead, we should be trying to create characters grounded in a racial identity, so "appropriation" instead becomes "creation.")
My hope is that all of the major detractors can respect a view like this:MovieBob said:Skin Deep
Sometimes embracing a double standard is the right thing to do.
Watch Video
I don't think so, and similarly I expect British TV would be more self-conscious about issues sensitive in Britain.Bobic said:Is it ok that I, a British person, find the casting of a nordic god as black a bit daft because I am without all that slave owning history guilt? (Although I am sure Idris is awesome in Thor as he is a great actor. I saw his BBC series Luther and he kicked ass, you should all go watch it now)