And what about those of us that consider it, and don't care? Yes I get it, Asian American men are demasculinize and Asian American women are highly sexulaized for those with some fetish. However, I honestly can't be bothered to care when I see stuff like this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sC5qkMGEnE] in the rest of the world. It really just doesn't compare, and as a result the plight of Asian American actors and actresses isn't something I care a great deal about.Malisteen said:One person says "Asian descended actors in America are overwhelmingly rejected from general roles, relegated to racially stereotyped supporting roles if that, and in this environment a white man playing one of the few well rounded Asian characters to show up in a Hollywood production has an entirely different and far more negative real world context than an actor of color playing a white role."
This person isn't demanding that you hate the movie. They might prefer you not support it with your money, but they're not even demanding that. They're asking you to simply be aware of the real world context of institutionalized racism that permeates the bones of Hollywood's studio system. To take it into account and consider it.
That said, I fully support Asian-Americans when I see the crap that spews from Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s mouth.
You can't see the forest through the trees. The whole point of the movie is that a person's identity transcends race and gender, hence Jim Sturgess playing a Korean man and Hugo Weaving playing a English women.Malisteen said:Context counts for a lot, if not everything, but there's more to context than just the internal narrative of a film. The society and system which produced it is also part of its context. The one cannot wipe out the other. The good does not wash away the bad, nor the bad the good. If you can acknowledge the cinematic talent and innovation behind "Triumph of the Will" while still being aware of and denouncing its horrific social context, then you can like Cloud Atlas as a film and still acknowledge that establishing technology for and furthering a precedent of white actors being cast in non-white roles is handing a racist Hollywood system more tools and excuses to marginalize colored actors and genuine colored representation in media.
Oh, you have it all wrong. Its not that I don't care because I just want to enjoy the movie, its I don't care for two reasons. One, I don't think its as serious as an issue as something like this in the media [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwN2M6ZIIRU], and two, the same people who condemn Cloud Atlas [http://www.racebending.com/v4/blog/cloud-atlas-conversation-yellowface-prejudice-artistic-license/] have nothing to say when they see Lucy Liu playing a role of a white Character [http://www.racebending.com/v4/featured/elementary-dear-lucy/]. Its a double standard and its something that I won't be a part of. You want me to care about Cloud Atlas? Ok, as long as you care about movies like Thor and White Chicks.Malisteen said:Responding instead with "Well I don't even see race, any actor should be allowed to play any role", is ignoring the issue that any actor isn't allowed to play any role. That actors of color are attacked for even stating that they would like to play a white role, that scripts are frequently rejected or rewritten when they explicitly call for a colored character in the lead role. That the Hollywood system regularly plays to and reinforces racial stereotypes while delivering a message that white = beautiful, white = good, white = normal. There's racism out there, and by refusing to see race, you're refusing to see the ways in which the race of non-white people is still held against them. It's choosing to not notice and not care because noticing and caring is too inconvenient if it comes between you and your appreciation of a movie. And no, I don't have to show the least respect for that sentiment.
Very true, which is why a person must have priorities and why I concern myself more with these kinds of issues concerning the media [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sC5qkMGEnE&t=6m27s], than some first world problems like this [http://iamkoream.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/jim-sturgess-cloud-atlas-asian.jpeg].Malisteen said:It's a self serving mantra that reaffirms the notion that you don't need to do even consider anything. As if ignoring the issue was enough. What problem ever went away by ignoring it? Racism isn't just something that one actively chooses, like a mustache-twirling villain. It's also something you can passively accept by simply choosing not to see, not to care. "Color blind" is just that - willfully blind to the real world issues faced by colored people. It can be a great moral for teaching kindergartners how the world should be, but once you're past grade school, once your world and your influence stretches past the room you're currently sitting in, once it's time for you to start dealing with how the world is, once reconciling the "is" with the "should be" is your responsibility, it's just not good enough anymore.