I remember the days when I actually got excited about to going to the cinema. It seems now I just go to meet friends and kill time...
Thanks for doing what I hoped and not raging at meBurck said:True to a degree.Megacherv said:Ladies and Gentlemen, Call of Duty
Need I really say any more?
You see, Call of Duty actually does what it does well, or at least better than others.
Yes, it's now the cookie cutter format for the modern FPS, but you can't deny that CoD titles are actually quite addicting. While I love to rage at those camping, heartbeat-sensing mofos which the game's shortcomings in design allows, it succeeded at holding my interest despite that.
Call of Duty is not analogous to "The Expendables"- poorly made games based on CoD are.
(^ I know you didn't say otherwise (since your post was short), but I thought it was a valid point.)
And now I feel like a asshole for my previous post. Damn it.Silinrun said:I'm open to a lot of movies of many different types. Sometimes, I think you do just need a "The Expendables" type of movie. It's action to its simplest. I loved it and I don't and will never regret enjoying it. But I also enjoyed Scott Pilgrim, I tried to get my Mom to take a look into it but when it came from Netflix she looked at it and completely passed over it even though I think she would have liked it too. It is always sad when good movies get completely skipped over. I also had heard from multiple sources that the new Pirates movie was terrible. I didn't see anything really horribly wrong with it, enjoyed it just fine. But I do completely get a lot of the things Movie Bob says on movies like The Expendables and Pirates 4. After watching his reviews for the Transformer movies, and then looking back on them (at the time I really enjoyed them) I did a 180 on my thoughts for them. I still found them "amusing" but, rather dull and unimaginative etc. Pretty much what Bob says about them in his reviews comes to mind and he says it better then I ever could. Anyway that's my 2 cents.
That much is true, but consider this:Megacherv said:Thanks for doing what I hoped and not raging at meBurck said:True to a degree.Megacherv said:Ladies and Gentlemen, Call of Duty
Need I really say any more?
You see, Call of Duty actually does what it does well, or at least better than others.
Yes, it's now the cookie cutter format for the modern FPS, but you can't deny that CoD titles are actually quite addicting. While I love to rage at those camping, heartbeat-sensing mofos which the game's shortcomings in design allows, it succeeded at holding my interest despite that.
Call of Duty is not analogous to "The Expendables"- poorly made games based on CoD are.
(^ I know you didn't say otherwise (since your post was short), but I thought it was a valid point.)
I watched The Expendables, went to see Scott Pilgrim, and then ended up going to see The Expendables AGAIN because I just didn't feel like it. I eventually saw SP with pressure from my girlfriend and the furious fans of the show. But I'm glad you've decided for me which projects suck. Lord knows that the unwashed masses and I aren't allowed to enjoy the lowest common denominator at any cost.Connor Lonske said:I wonder how many people in this thread saw The Expendables instead of Scott Pilgrim back in September. If you did, you are now officially on my shit list, because I know you posted about how great this video is. Hell, this is probably the best journalist on the Escapist, and you are mocking him for saying he is right, yet you probably will continue to spend money on projects that will suck. Thank you very much.
Oh yeah, and if you saw The Expendables and Scott Pilgrim, than I'm indifferent.
Because if the people who want crappy blockbusters are getting in the way of the people who take value into their movies. As he explained, if the Niche movies don't make money, than no more niche movies will be made, and all movies will be The Expendables or reboots with no effort. And that day is coming so close that it feels like the movies will no longer be art, but just another form of pointless entertainment, which is one step closer to people being made with a cookie cutter as with the films and media they watch. And I bet you have no arguments with such a future, don't you. Want everyone to be uncultured and all think the same way as everyone else. And you know what will happen then. Fahrenheit 451(the book), if you don't know what that is then go look it up.maninahat said:Whilst everything Bob says is sadly true, I can't help feeling that if tons of people went to the cookie cutter "shitty" movies and barely anyone went to the niche, indy, "cerebral" stuff, then why is it a bad thing that we get more of the big blockbuster action movies? That is clearly what the majority want! Why should we be prioritizing the tastes of the snooty few over the blood lust of the millions?
For the record. I went to see The Expendables twice and had a great time, like millions of others. I had to practically force myself to watch Scott Pilgrim (or rather, my girlfriend did), and I ultimately found it only okay. So I'm not too bothered by this current arrangement of dumb action being favoured by Hollywood over goofy niche stuff.
No, I mean, the studios have a long proud tradition of screwing over the theaters to get maximum profit from 'em, but I'm not convinced they can't do the same thing to retailers, particularly subscription services...nuba km said:because box office is what brings in a majority of the money as a LOT of people still go to the cinema and how well a movie does in the box office depends on whether it gets a squeal or not(most of the time).LordBojangles said:Isn't the whole business model for the film industry kind of broken nowadays? People haven't primarily used theaters to see movies for a while now...why such emphasis on box office?
I saw scott pilgrim and bought the DVD, I want my lovecraft.
/shudderbaconsarnie said:I totally agree with this apart from:
1. The expendables was actually a pretty good film.
2. Scott pilgrim was an incredibly poor film.