Wait.. why? I don't know the guy, but just checked out his site and it looks pretty good.Lono Shrugged said:Holy Fuck you did not just say Adam Hughes is a "big talent"
Just GIS "Adam Hughes" and you'll he represents the very worst elements of comic book art since Liefeld.
Satosuke said:On the subject of the ending change in the movie vs. the comic: Yeah, the movie one makes more sense in a thematic context, but not really in a logical context. I'll continue my post under a spoiler covering:
The made-up alien invader in the comic, in my opinion, works far better than pinning the power plant catastrophes on Dr. Manhattan, because, in the eyes of the world, Dr. Manhattan is someone we're familiar with. He may be super powerful, but he's not entirely beyond human. He's still labeled as an AMERICAN, for chrissakes. I can't see every country in the world believing that Dr. Manhattan went rogue, whereas the alien invader is completely and utterly unknown to us. Introducing an enemy that is totally alien to us works better IMO than trying to paint a superhero as a sudden traitor against humanity as a whole.
But, I will say that in translating the book to the movie, that ending change was necessary to keep it from going too long, and was probably the best solution Hayter and Tse could have come up with.
JasonBurnout16 said:Wait, there was a different ending? I've only seen the film so didn't know.
Anyone want to enlighten to me what the alternate ending is??
He's not BAD he just has this habit of really oversexualizing his female characters. Which I guess is ok for some people, but considering MovieBob is supposed to be a forward thinking comic book nerd that threw me for a loop.walsfeo said:Wait.. why? I don't know the guy, but just checked out his site and it looks pretty good.Lono Shrugged said:Holy Fuck you did not just say Adam Hughes is a "big talent"
Just GIS "Adam Hughes" and you'll he represents the very worst elements of comic book art since Liefeld.
OK I don't want to say you're wrong or bad or anything like that, you read whatever you want I don't want to come across as telling you what you should enjoy but my inner comic nerd won't let me rest unless I post this for the record.Diane Miller said:Actually, I only heard about the prequels last week, and fully intend to ignore them. Your comments about the state of the Marvel/DC universe, though, give the principal reason I haven't read comics on any kind of a regular basis since about 1986. Except for a couple of minor "gee, that looks vaguely interesting", there really hasn't been anything worth reading.
Yes but they shaped it in very different ways, Watchmen made things smarter, more detailed with mutilayed narratives and more intellectual dialog, DKR just made thaning darker and more manly. Watchmen paved the way for Vertigo, the British invasion and ultimately Kingdom Come. DKR conversely set us up for Rob Liefled, Image and the Ultimate universe. Now not all of the former have been good and not all the latter have been bad but overall Watchmen did far more good than DKR did.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:First things first, can we stop acting as if Watchmen is the only comic from the eighties that changed people's perceptions of superheroes? The Dark Knight Returns was every bit as important and revolutionary in it's impact, and considering it's (the goddam) Batman, I'm surprised it constantly gets overshadowed by its sibling. I know Frank Miller ain't cool anymore, but you have to give the man his due: TDKR was every bit as important as Watchmen in re-shaping the superhero landscape in the mid-80s.
Don't lump an entire medium into the superhero genre. There are some fantastic books coming out right now outside of the DC/Marvel sphere.Aiddon said:This just reinforces my stance on the comic industry being in one, big stagnant state ever since the post-Dark Age collapse.