Skrableren said:
Monxeroth said:
"Society judges women based on their appearence rather than their ability"
[...]
If you really want to get to the root of the problem, ie, why women have their general value based on the exterior, is to ask the right question.
Is it ONLY because society and heterosexual white males judge them by their appearence
OR
could it be the fact that some women really don't help that problem at all by simply, oh i dunno
PRESENTING THEMSELVES AS IF THAT IS ALL THEY HAVE TO OFFER
[...]
Too often do women expect to get handed everything and not be judged by their ability, because they think their appearence is enough.
So both parts imo have to do their parts in the sense that
Some women need to stop focusing on their appearence and using that as an excuse to
get what they want, and also stop presenting themselves as if the appearence was the most important thing to them.
This may be because I am in the middle of my stressy exams right now. But this is probably the most hurtful and misogynistic thing I have heard all day. So.. what you are saying here, is that because women tries to adhere to societies ideals, and standards for what they should look like, that they are essentially, asking for it?
I hope that is not what you are saying.
So, because I chose to get a wax? My opinion is suddenly invalidated? Because I wear makeup every day, I can't comment on the issue of the sexualisation, and dehumanization of my gender? I understand that you see a woman trying to follow the standards that society have put up for her, and at the same time protesting them, as a hypocritical act.
But ugly women are not treated kindly, not by their peers, not by their male colleagues. Males always, as in the example with the female politician mocked by males for her looks, in some way assign women value through their sexual appeal. And that is no matter what intellectual feat they have preformed.
And as a woman? you can be damn sure that it is a factor I take into account when i get my job interviews, start at a new school or workplace, or even when I leave my damn house.
It is a part of me that is constantly judged every where I go, where ever I turn I will get judged for my sexual appeal, and I will be assigned a value because of it.
A woman can preform an intellectual feat, but if she don't look good doing it, men don't give a damn.
It's not wise to lump the entire male sex into one opinion, Skrableren. Monoxeroth has a point that many Women do embrace stereotypes of women. Fashion, aperances, etc. These things are enjoyed and embraced by many women. The same can be said with women who are against such ideas as make-up. The same can be said for those who base women off their skill rather than beauty. There will be men who will do either or in the work force.
That does not mean I am implying it's not an issue, however to lump it as an absolute that 'ALL men base women off looks.' is stupid.
Is it right for women to have men buy them things? One would say that a man buying something for a woman is a Gentlemen act, a Feminist would say that man is acting like a traditionalist, others would say the guys just bought the woman something and not think about it. Is it right for a woman to take things from other men, when she is single, even if she is not being actively flirtaous?
Women have been given different rights and entitlements as men, and men have never had those rights or entitlements.
Women and Children first off the ship first.
No obligation to be in the military, or the draft.
Higher chances of keeping their own children after divorce. I can go on about the rights that women have and are not even aware of them.
Now let's go back to your beauty remark. Is it fair? No, it isn't. A woman is ugly to society will not get all the nice perks, remarks, or respect then what a beatiful woman will get. Those things are standards we, as a culture, have expected it to be. It's not fair or right. Sadly men are under their own their own standards that we must obey. The two major aspect of men are sex and power.
Men are supposed to have an aplha male drive. To be strong, and overcome all others. We are obligated to either be skillful in something or be strong physcally. If we have neither these things, a man is deemed useless. He may be a nice person, but if he does nothing in terms of work, skill or anythig production. A woman can be accepted for having no skill, as long as she is pretty.
Sex to men is very important. If a man does not have sex, the culture laughs at the person. It is to be expected that males get laid or be deemed a loser, the 40 year old virgin is a nice example. A Woman can be a virgin for longer because most people are not going to ask if a woman is one or not, thus a veil of cultural protection. Men talk about sex, so a man's virginity is questioned and you get a 40 year old virgin crisis where they MUST get this guy to get sex for the sake of getting sex.
Both sexes have standards that we must abide by. It's not fair that we have them, and equality must be the long term goal. Generalizing men or women will not solve this issue, because men and women are all going to agree on it. There must be admittance to both sides have reinforced stereotypes and figure out a way to eliminate them.