I don't like the 360 controller. The different level analog stick have also felt odd to me, as do the size. I have smaller hands though, so that's probably part of it, but it felt too big, especially with the battery pack.
No it doesn't. Nintendo never stated that the Wii remote was a 1:1 motion device. It was never claimed as one, except by wishful dreamers of the media. All they said was "Hey, if you move the controller, it does stuff!" That's precisely what it did.Reuq said:but really the Wii is the worst purly because it lies about what it does.
Agreed, but I feel anyone who expected otherwise deserves the disappointment.Reuq said:The Wii?
Some of the old ones were bad, and the Original XBox controllers were a bit big, but really the Wii is the worst purly because it lies about what it does.
That would be me. My hands were just big enough to use the XBox controller. I still enjoy the heft of the wireless 360 controllers.Evilbunny said:The original xbox controller only worked if you were a gorilla and had hands massive enough to hold the thing.
Yeah, and I'm sure that all those commercials showing people playing Wii Sports didn't suggest 1-to-1 motion to people who hadn't seen motion controls before. Considering how aggressively the Wii was marketed to non-gamers, I wouldn't be surprised if lots of people think to this day that the Wii is supposed to have 1-to-1 motion tracking.DrDeath3191 said:No it doesn't. Nintendo never stated that the Wii remote was a 1:1 motion device. It was never claimed as one, except by wishful dreamers of the media. All they said was "Hey, if you move the controller, it does stuff!" That's precisely what it did.Reuq said:but really the Wii is the worst purly because it lies about what it does.
I think that's more your fault than the controller's, I've never heard of that happening before.Hail Fire 998 said:The PS1 controller. That thing would fly out of my sweaty hands so much... Other than that it was dependable as hell. It was just too damn slick...
It does work. Quite well, actually. I shake the controller, and a response happens on screen. I use motion to control the game. Motion control. Yes, it would have been nice to have 1:1 at the start, but that would have driven the price of the console to astronomical hieghts.Reuq said:Ahhh, fanboy alert. If they are going to release motion control then it better bloody work, thats like saying that Xbox never acctually promised better graphics, they didn't but it is a given, it should be there.DrDeath3191 said:No it doesn't. Nintendo never stated that the Wii remote was a 1:1 motion device. It was never claimed as one, except by wishful dreamers of the media. All they said was "Hey, if you move the controller, it does stuff!" That's precisely what it did.Reuq said:but really the Wii is the worst purly because it lies about what it does.
OH Gezz. I had to pull out a Jaguar controller just in case it was not as bad as I remember. It is. I also for some reason never remember exactly how big it was until I pick it up.chimpzy said:Let's see. We've got the Colecovision, Intellivision, Atari 5600, Atari Jaguar, Phillips CDi and the N64.
All pretty lousy.
To be honest, you're being picky. They've sorta' been working on it, Wii MotionPlus. It hasn't been done quite enough for them to affordably use the technology, or at least, I wouldn't imagine.Reuq said:You flick your wrist and something unrelated happens on screen, its not even close to motion control, and is therefore not a good controller. If it was expensive and 1:1 then it would be fine.DrDeath3191 said:It does work. Quite well, actually. I shake the controller, and a response happens on screen. I use motion to control the game. Motion control. Yes, it would have been nice to have 1:1 at the start, but that would have driven the price of the console to astronomical hieghts.Reuq said:Ahhh, fanboy alert. If they are going to release motion control then it better bloody work, thats like saying that Xbox never acctually promised better graphics, they didn't but it is a given, it should be there.DrDeath3191 said:No it doesn't. Nintendo never stated that the Wii remote was a 1:1 motion device. It was never claimed as one, except by wishful dreamers of the media. All they said was "Hey, if you move the controller, it does stuff!" That's precisely what it did.Reuq said:but really the Wii is the worst purly because it lies about what it does.
So since pushing a button hardly relates tothe action it pertains to, that means that Button control does not exist, and that any controller ever concieved fails? I'm not sure I follow your logic.Reuq said:You flick your wrist and something unrelated happens on screen, its not even close to motion control, and is therefore not a good controller. If it was expensive and 1:1 then it would be fine.DrDeath3191 said:It does work. Quite well, actually. I shake the controller, and a response happens on screen. I use motion to control the game. Motion control. Yes, it would have been nice to have 1:1 at the start, but that would have driven the price of the console to astronomical hieghts.Reuq said:Ahhh, fanboy alert. If they are going to release motion control then it better bloody work, thats like saying that Xbox never acctually promised better graphics, they didn't but it is a given, it should be there.DrDeath3191 said:No it doesn't. Nintendo never stated that the Wii remote was a 1:1 motion device. It was never claimed as one, except by wishful dreamers of the media. All they said was "Hey, if you move the controller, it does stuff!" That's precisely what it did.Reuq said:but really the Wii is the worst purly because it lies about what it does.
Agreed, the first time I used one, I couldn't figure out how to hold it.Hoppetussa said:The Nintendo 64. It worked, but the first time you saw it or played with it, you just thought: "WTF"