The end of Lulzsec.

Recommended Videos

Impluse_101

New member
Jun 25, 2009
1,415
0
0
Eh....I actually found...one thing that they did pretty funny. (Puts up Flame Shield) It was the time they hacked all those pron sites. I couldn't help but laugh my ass off.

Can't say I'll miss them, but they didn't do harm to me really. Sure, they took down the escapist...but I'm still writing this message now aren't I?

As for those who had their account information released, I didn't look at any of it. Nor did I really care personally.

However, I do feel bad for those who did.

P.S: I'm trying to look at them at many angles, the most hardest being...the good.
 

inFAMOUSCowZ

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,586
0
0
They got what they deserved. Though I won;t lie at first it was funny, but by the third person they hacked it was just ridiculous
 

Polaris19

New member
Aug 12, 2010
995
0
0
"For the past 50 days we've been disrupting and exposing corporations, governments, often the general population itself, and quite possibly everything in between, just because we could. All to selflessly entertain others - vanity, fame, recognition, all of these things are shadowed by our desire for that which we all love. The raw, uninterrupted, chaotic thrill of entertainment and anarchy. It's what we all crave, even the seemingly lifeless politicians and emotionless, middle-aged self-titled failures. You are not failures. You have not blown away. You can get what you want and you are worth having it, believe in yourself."

Fuck that, I enjoy my failure. No, I embrace it. You can take your anarchy and shove it where the sun don't shine LulzSec. Hope every last member of your little band of cyber-terroists ends up in jail.

Good riddance to them.
 

LetalisK

New member
May 5, 2010
2,769
0
0
I get no more enjoyment out of this than I do when I squash an insignificant roach in the driveway.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,089
0
0
Ryu-Kage said:
...and two weeks later, nobody is going to care that LulzSec even existed. Especially since they didn't really leave any serious impact at all.
Really? They've got the hacktivist movement going strong (things are still being hacked everywhere). They've cost Sony millions, if not billions of dollars in damages through stock price and users abandoning ship as well as making everyone who knew about them start worrying if their passwords were all different, etc.

They may be assholes, but to deny they didn't have an impact is silly.

Edit:

Not sure if lulzsec attacked sony or not, either way, lulzsec have everyone thinking about security, that was my point.

And yes, the reason I edited was because it was pointed out to me. No 12 messages telling me I got it wrong in the morning please. One is more than enough.
 

Ryu-Kage

New member
May 6, 2011
153
0
0
dogstile said:
Ryu-Kage said:
...and two weeks later, nobody is going to care that LulzSec even existed. Especially since they didn't really leave any serious impact at all.
Really? They've got the hacktivist movement going strong (things are still being hacked everywhere). They've cost Sony millions, if not billions of dollars in damages through stock price and users abandoning ship as well as making everyone who knew about them start worrying if their passwords were all different, etc.

They may be assholes, but to deny they didn't have an impact is silly.
I thought it was Anonymous who attacked Sony, NOT LulzSec. Isn't there a difference?
 

Daverson

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,163
0
0
One of theirs got arrested over here, the CPS have effectively banned him from the internet forever. So that's funny. It also explains why they've gone to ground. ^_^
 

hawkeye52

New member
Jul 17, 2009
759
0
0
think of it this way though. These people do what all other hackers do except they posted up what they did. If they were snapping through security this quickly without to much effort then just imagine how other hacker groups who don't publish what they are doing atm and how much money they will be making off this info they are taking. What they have done is just denote how poor internet security is for big businesses and government bodies.
 

Shamanic Enzan

New member
Dec 17, 2007
125
0
0
Either:

A) They're running scared of being hacked/arrested/Anon'd, seeing as how it takes about 50-60 days of iplogging to concretely say that someone on the internet is a specific person.

B) An internal fight split them up but they have to keep the group mentality going.

C) They're trying to form something akin to a Stand Alone Complex (and since it is Anon I wouldn't doubt they would try Anime-style philosophy, that or you know, that 2 day binge of GitS hurt my brain irreparably)

D) They only paid for 60 days of hosting.

They aren't gone though, this is the internet, where there is always at least one person that will agree with you. With their form of anarchy, no matter how Skiddie in nature, one person is all it takes.

Edit: Also a couple posts above me (Posted while I was typing) is essentially correct, I don't feel they fully practiced what they preached, unfortunately LulzSec may just become the "hero" of the hacktivist movement.

Dibs on the bunker.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,089
0
0
Ryu-Kage said:
dogstile said:
Ryu-Kage said:
...and two weeks later, nobody is going to care that LulzSec even existed. Especially since they didn't really leave any serious impact at all.
Really? They've got the hacktivist movement going strong (things are still being hacked everywhere). They've cost Sony millions, if not billions of dollars in damages through stock price and users abandoning ship as well as making everyone who knew about them start worrying if their passwords were all different, etc.

They may be assholes, but to deny they didn't have an impact is silly.
I thought it was Anonymous who attacked Sony, NOT LulzSec. Isn't there a difference?
You know, I may have gotten confused. I'll shove a disclaimer in my post saying i'm not actually sure because, well, i'm tired and i'm not in the mood to go check
 

C2Ultima

Future sovereign of Oz
Nov 6, 2010
506
0
0
They're only stopping because they realized the government was cracking down on them, and panicked. Good fucking riddance.
 

SeriousIssues

New member
Jan 6, 2010
289
0
0
Maybe I would've enjoyed them more if they weren't smirking douchebags doing more than just pranks in good-fun. Maybe if they had simply added a picture of their (horrible) logo to a site to prove the flawed security, but they had to go even further.

And now they're doing what looks like running away with their tail between their legs. They have a history of weaseling out of embarresments and saving face. And now that they're about to be brought down upon hard, they've fled under the guise of saints we'll be sad to see go.
Come on, LulzSec. GTFO with your BS.
 

Throwitawaynow

New member
Aug 29, 2010
759
0
0
dogstile said:
Ryu-Kage said:
dogstile said:
Ryu-Kage said:
...and two weeks later, nobody is going to care that LulzSec even existed. Especially since they didn't really leave any serious impact at all.
Really? They've got the hacktivist movement going strong (things are still being hacked everywhere). They've cost Sony millions, if not billions of dollars in damages through stock price and users abandoning ship as well as making everyone who knew about them start worrying if their passwords were all different, etc.

They may be assholes, but to deny they didn't have an impact is silly.
I thought it was Anonymous who attacked Sony, NOT LulzSec. Isn't there a difference?
You know, I may have gotten confused. I'll shove a disclaimer in my post saying i'm not actually sure because, well, i'm tired and i'm not in the mood to go check
Anonymous hit PSN, then stopped because it prevented people from playing. Someone else hit PSN after really hard, no one knows who. Lulzsec hit Sony pictures. Your first sentence was correct though.

http://lulzsecurity.com/releases/