Look, "America" fought just as much for its freedom from French rule as the British did.GrimTuesday said:I'm not saying that there were any good reason why Britain should have retained the colonies, I'm just saying that the reasons that were given as to why the revolution was justified were rather shaky. The main reason was because of Taxes. Of course, what many people gloss over is the fact that these taxes were really meant to pay off the debt incurred fighting the French Indian War, which was fought to keep the colonialists safe from the attack French and their Indian allies. Prior to this, the colonies had been taxed fairly little, and to me, the idea that the colonist had to help pay off the debts caused by the British army keeping them safe, seems logical. Of course then people bring up the no taxation without representation thing, which to me seems foolish because logistically it is entirely impractical for the colonists to send their representatives to London because of how far removed they would be from the actual colonies, it would be like having a person who lived in Britain representing you.
Yes geographically it makes sense that the colonies would have split from Britain eventually, however, I think that the reason's that were given for the rebellion weren't severe enough to warrant a somewhat long and bloody war.
They had a taste for freedom after that, most of those who left Europe in search of new opportunities yet in these British colonies you found they had LESS freedoms than had they stayed home in the old country!
I'm British and even I know all the work of the 'Founding Fathers', it wasn't just a case of "waaah taxes" they wanted to make something new, they had BIG plans for a 'United States' and they knew they could only achieve it with independence. America and Britain had to go their separate ways.
They were not arguing FOR representation, they knew that was impossible. They were not arguing for end of taxation either. What they wanted was Independence! Like India would 170 years later, to spite UK going into so much debt fighting the Japanese to keep them out of India.
And that debt of the French-Indian war was repaid when it was needed most in World War 2 with Lend-Lease, such a favourable loan with no interest to be paid back over a 45 year period it was essentially a gift yet retaining the pride of accountability.