If it's anything like the Hostel movies, it'll have the impact of a wet fart; Instantly gross and immediately forgotten.
The original Cannibal Holocaust had animal killings. This film doesn't feature any of that.MarsAtlas said:I didn't realize that they actually slaughtered animals in the film until I read your comment. I don't think I'll be watching this or probably any of Roth's films in the future. Actual killing for entertainment is very much divorced from simulated killing for entertainment and I'd rather not contribute to it.the December King said:I am a big horror movie fan, but I am even more against animals being killed or tortured for entertainment. I know that this is merely an homage to Cannibal Holocaust, but even so, I won't be seeing it, as I just can't bring myself to patronize anything remotely attached to that kind of production- it just doesn't sit right with me.
Ironic, isn't it? I love horror movies, right up until I'm actually horrified!
I do appreciate gore and blood fx in my horror movies, though- honestly, you did a great job of selling the movie to me!- but I just can't.
Woah sorry MarsAtlas, I meant that in the 'original' (Cannibal Holocaust), there were animals killed for the production, not in any of Eli Roth's stuff, as far as I know. I just meant that I wasn't interested in honoring the 'original' by watching the remake, up-to-code or otherwise... sorry for the confusion.MarsAtlas said:I didn't realize that they actually slaughtered animals in the film until I read your comment. I don't think I'll be watching this or probably any of Roth's films in the future. Actual killing for entertainment is very much divorced from simulated killing for entertainment and I'd rather not contribute to it.the December King said:I am a big horror movie fan, but I am even more against animals being killed or tortured for entertainment. I know that this is merely an homage to Cannibal Holocaust, but even so, I won't be seeing it, as I just can't bring myself to patronize anything remotely attached to that kind of production- it just doesn't sit right with me.
Ironic, isn't it? I love horror movies, right up until I'm actually horrified!
I do appreciate gore and blood fx in my horror movies, though- honestly, you did a great job of selling the movie to me!- but I just can't.
Cabin Fever wasn't bad.tf2godz said:at least at one point those two made a Good movieZontar said:That still sounds like quite a few Hollywood directors, like Shamalon or Tarantino.
Probably a single nipple.Tony2077 said:all I'm wondering about is what that graphic nudity is
Sorry, I'm probably being pedantic here and I hate that but I feel a strong urge to clarify something here because I see this mistake made a lot! A fetish isn't necessarily something sexual. One can fetishize something and gain no sexual pleasure/arousal from it at all. One that leaps to mind that's actually fairly common is the way a lot of people fetishize picking at zits. Youtube is full of such videos with tons of views. It's not that people find watching it arousing, just compelling for some reason. I only speak up about this because a lot of people conflate fetish with sexual fetish like they do objectification with sexual objectification when the latter of both is merely a sub-category. Eli Roth may have a gore or cannibalism fetish and that fetish may be total non-sexual is what I'm driving at. Again, sorry to be pedantic.MarsAtlas said:You do know what a fetish is, right? Its something that somebody finds sexually arousing, period. They don't have to partake in it and they can recognize that an actual instance of it would be ethical. For example, there's rape fantasy. Fantasy, as in nobody is being forced to do anything. Its really just one of many of the more extreme forms of sex between a dom and a sub.
maybe but that doesn't explain the graphic partJanichsan said:Cabin Fever wasn't bad.tf2godz said:at least at one point those two made a Good movieZontar said:That still sounds like quite a few Hollywood directors, like Shamalon or Tarantino.
Probably a single nipple.Tony2077 said:all I'm wondering about is what that graphic nudity is
To say I didn't like it with the power of a thousand suns would be an understatement but if you liked the movie no skin off my bones, you had more fun then I did.Janichsan said:Cabin Fever wasn't bad.tf2godz said:at least at one point those two made a Good movieZontar said:That still sounds like quite a few Hollywood directors, like Shamalon or Tarantino.
hentropy said:I consider myself someone who at least has some kind of respect for the shock and gore genre (more than I do for mainstream jumpscare horror in most cases at least), and I have little interest in The Green Inferno. Cannibal Holocaust wasn't a perfect movie by any means but it did include an element of complexity and story, examining the morality of westerners trying to disrupt the way of life in those areas. Just doing a lazy ripoff of the movie with better effects isn't enough for my greenbacks.
There really is no more proof needed to show the MPAA is corrupt as hell, this case seemed to be par for the course at this point.
Well, Marter mentioned "genital mutilation", so I have a sinking feeling that answers your question.Tony2077 said:all I'm wondering about is what that graphic nudity is
I'm not saying the film is racist (I think some ways it's offensive but not in a racist sense). I'm saying it's satire Falls flat on its ass.KissingSunlight said:This critic really undersold the movie. It is a dark satire about activism. Since people who are involved in activism are really sensitive to any criticism at all, it's no wonder they are trying to dismiss this movie as nothing but a senseless gore-fest. The message of the movie is that activists are naïve at best and corrupt at worst. As for the alleged xenophobia, it's not there. The movie doesn't portray the disconnected natives as villains. Sure, they're cannibals. However, they are just people minding there own business and other people from the outside world are intruding on them. If anything, they come off as more victims than villains.
Even though, this movie is dark, cynical, and gory. It does offer some glimmers of optimism. It must be mentioned that this movie is also really funny. It's not completely a comedy. It does asks you to acknowledge the absurdity and hypocrisy of the activist group and the situations that they get themselves in.
Overall, I really liked it. It's not the best movie of the year. It is a really good horror movie to check out in the upcoming month.
I do want to add one postscript. For the people who are complaining about the "xenophobia" and "racism" of this movie and No Escape, because white people are victim of violence at the hands of people who aren't the same race as them. If I were to follow your logic, I must assume that you also found movies like Fruitvale Station, Selma, and 12 Years a Slave "Xenophobic" and "Racist". After all, those movies feature a race of people who were victims of violence at the hands of people who aren't the same race as them.
probably more watchable then the filmspringheeljack said:I think it would be a good idea if they just made a movie about the making of a movie like this. It would be funny to see them get all the fake blood and gore together and watching the actors trying to get into character and laugh at the ridiculousness of it all