The Green Inferno - Cannibal Holocaust Redux

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,154
4,920
118
If it's anything like the Hostel movies, it'll have the impact of a wet fart; Instantly gross and immediately forgotten.
 

BiscuitWheels

New member
Jan 10, 2009
256
0
0
I was wondering if the comment section was gonna be a big ballyhoo about the internet boogieman du jour and I wasn't disappointed! I never got the appeal of films like this. And anyone who wants to see it just because some SJW's get et? Congratulations, you may just be a sociopath.
 

Kenbo Slice

Deep In The Willow
Jun 7, 2010
2,706
0
41
Gender
Male
MarsAtlas said:
the December King said:
I am a big horror movie fan, but I am even more against animals being killed or tortured for entertainment. I know that this is merely an homage to Cannibal Holocaust, but even so, I won't be seeing it, as I just can't bring myself to patronize anything remotely attached to that kind of production- it just doesn't sit right with me.

Ironic, isn't it? I love horror movies, right up until I'm actually horrified!

I do appreciate gore and blood fx in my horror movies, though- honestly, you did a great job of selling the movie to me!- but I just can't.
I didn't realize that they actually slaughtered animals in the film until I read your comment. I don't think I'll be watching this or probably any of Roth's films in the future. Actual killing for entertainment is very much divorced from simulated killing for entertainment and I'd rather not contribute to it.
The original Cannibal Holocaust had animal killings. This film doesn't feature any of that.
 

the December King

Member
Legacy
Mar 3, 2010
1,580
1
3
MarsAtlas said:
the December King said:
I am a big horror movie fan, but I am even more against animals being killed or tortured for entertainment. I know that this is merely an homage to Cannibal Holocaust, but even so, I won't be seeing it, as I just can't bring myself to patronize anything remotely attached to that kind of production- it just doesn't sit right with me.

Ironic, isn't it? I love horror movies, right up until I'm actually horrified!

I do appreciate gore and blood fx in my horror movies, though- honestly, you did a great job of selling the movie to me!- but I just can't.
I didn't realize that they actually slaughtered animals in the film until I read your comment. I don't think I'll be watching this or probably any of Roth's films in the future. Actual killing for entertainment is very much divorced from simulated killing for entertainment and I'd rather not contribute to it.
Woah sorry MarsAtlas, I meant that in the 'original' (Cannibal Holocaust), there were animals killed for the production, not in any of Eli Roth's stuff, as far as I know. I just meant that I wasn't interested in honoring the 'original' by watching the remake, up-to-code or otherwise... sorry for the confusion.

Interestingly enough, I also watched Apocalypse Now when I was young, and thought it was a powerful movie... and then found out the bull sacrifice was real. It also has turned me off of the film. A shame... such a small scene... but fuck it, I can't abide that sort of thing.

EDIT: woops! Looks like alot of folks jumped in to cover me there in earlier posts. Thanks team!
 

Kalashnikov2092

New member
Feb 15, 2011
99
0
0
Saw this movie, it was a blast. Gory as gore can be, doesn't try to take itself very seriously, and no, no animals were killed making this movie. I don't think an animal even dies in the Green Inferno. That happened in Cannibal Holocaust. I've enjoyed a lot of Eli Roth's films because he's so unapologetic with the subject matter. I mean jeez, I never get grossed out by gore stuff because I know it isn't real. I appreciate the effects work that goes into making this ludicrous shit look tangible and real. I have fun with Eli Roth movies. They're not my favorites or should be considered classics, but they serve perfect entertainment for gore hounds and horror fans. People take entertainment way too seriously.
 

Gorrath

New member
Feb 22, 2013
1,648
0
0
I can't wait to see this flick. I don't much care if there's not much more to it than killing, torture and gore; that's the whole reason I love Evil Dead! As for the whole issue with natives killing outsiders, I don't see how that is particularly offensive. This is a thing that has actually happened in the not-so-distant past. There's a real world problem with land-grabs leading to the deaths of tribal peoples but I don't see what bearing that has on this movie. Taking a potshot at slacktivists (although in this case they don't really fit that description) is, I think, a huge deal. One can mock nonsensical/poorly informed activists without supporting the thing that those activists are fighting against. The whole Colbert Report vs. Racism thing leaps to mind.
 

Gorrath

New member
Feb 22, 2013
1,648
0
0
MarsAtlas said:
You do know what a fetish is, right? Its something that somebody finds sexually arousing, period. They don't have to partake in it and they can recognize that an actual instance of it would be ethical. For example, there's rape fantasy. Fantasy, as in nobody is being forced to do anything. Its really just one of many of the more extreme forms of sex between a dom and a sub.
Sorry, I'm probably being pedantic here and I hate that but I feel a strong urge to clarify something here because I see this mistake made a lot! A fetish isn't necessarily something sexual. One can fetishize something and gain no sexual pleasure/arousal from it at all. One that leaps to mind that's actually fairly common is the way a lot of people fetishize picking at zits. Youtube is full of such videos with tons of views. It's not that people find watching it arousing, just compelling for some reason. I only speak up about this because a lot of people conflate fetish with sexual fetish like they do objectification with sexual objectification when the latter of both is merely a sub-category. Eli Roth may have a gore or cannibalism fetish and that fetish may be total non-sexual is what I'm driving at. Again, sorry to be pedantic.
 

Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)

Get the point
Legacy
Aug 1, 2011
2,946
523
118
Cretaceous
Country
USA
Gender
Dinosaur
Janichsan said:
tf2godz said:
Zontar said:
That still sounds like quite a few Hollywood directors, like Shamalon or Tarantino.
at least at one point those two made a Good movie
Cabin Fever wasn't bad.
To say I didn't like it with the power of a thousand suns would be an understatement but if you liked the movie no skin off my bones, you had more fun then I did.
 

P-89 Scorpion

New member
Sep 25, 2014
466
0
0
hentropy said:
I consider myself someone who at least has some kind of respect for the shock and gore genre (more than I do for mainstream jumpscare horror in most cases at least), and I have little interest in The Green Inferno. Cannibal Holocaust wasn't a perfect movie by any means but it did include an element of complexity and story, examining the morality of westerners trying to disrupt the way of life in those areas. Just doing a lazy ripoff of the movie with better effects isn't enough for my greenbacks.

There really is no more proof needed to show the MPAA is corrupt as hell, this case seemed to be par for the course at this point.

In the UK the Green Inferno got an 18 rating (the equivalent here to an R) and passed uncut and the BBFC has no problem cutting or banning films that it finds excessive.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Tony2077 said:
all I'm wondering about is what that graphic nudity is
Well, Marter mentioned "genital mutilation", so I have a sinking feeling that answers your question.
 

Darth_Payn

New member
Aug 5, 2009
2,868
0
0
I think that without a career in filmmaking, Eli Roth would be a serial killer. 'Cause you don't need therapy when you can work through your issues in movies.
 

KissingSunlight

Molotov Cocktails, Anyone?
Jul 3, 2013
1,237
0
0
This critic really undersold the movie. It is a dark satire about activism. Since people who are involved in activism are really sensitive to any criticism at all, it's no wonder they are trying to dismiss this movie as nothing but a senseless gore-fest. The message of the movie is that activists are naïve at best and corrupt at worst. As for the alleged xenophobia, it's not there. The movie doesn't portray the disconnected natives as villains. Sure, they're cannibals. However, they are just people minding their own business and other people from the outside world are intruding on them. If anything, they come off as more victims than villains.

Even though, this movie is dark, cynical, and gory. It does offer some glimmers of optimism. It must be mentioned that this movie is also really funny. It's not completely a comedy. It does asks you to acknowledge the absurdity and hypocrisy of the activist group and the situations that they get themselves in.

Overall, I really liked it. It's not the best movie of the year. It is a really good horror movie to check out in the upcoming month.

I do want to add one postscript. For the people who are complaining about the "xenophobia" and "racism" of this movie and No Escape, because white people are victim of violence at the hands of people who aren't the same race as them. If I were to follow your logic, I must assume that you also found movies like Fruitvale Station, Selma, and 12 Years a Slave "Xenophobic" and "Racist". After all, those movies feature a race of people who were victims of violence at the hands of people who aren't the same race as them.
 

springheeljack

Red in Tooth and Claw
May 6, 2010
645
0
0
I think it would be a good idea if they just made a movie about the making of a movie like this. It would be funny to see them get all the fake blood and gore together and watching the actors trying to get into character and laugh at the ridiculousness of it all
 

Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)

Get the point
Legacy
Aug 1, 2011
2,946
523
118
Cretaceous
Country
USA
Gender
Dinosaur
KissingSunlight said:
This critic really undersold the movie. It is a dark satire about activism. Since people who are involved in activism are really sensitive to any criticism at all, it's no wonder they are trying to dismiss this movie as nothing but a senseless gore-fest. The message of the movie is that activists are naïve at best and corrupt at worst. As for the alleged xenophobia, it's not there. The movie doesn't portray the disconnected natives as villains. Sure, they're cannibals. However, they are just people minding there own business and other people from the outside world are intruding on them. If anything, they come off as more victims than villains.

Even though, this movie is dark, cynical, and gory. It does offer some glimmers of optimism. It must be mentioned that this movie is also really funny. It's not completely a comedy. It does asks you to acknowledge the absurdity and hypocrisy of the activist group and the situations that they get themselves in.

Overall, I really liked it. It's not the best movie of the year. It is a really good horror movie to check out in the upcoming month.

I do want to add one postscript. For the people who are complaining about the "xenophobia" and "racism" of this movie and No Escape, because white people are victim of violence at the hands of people who aren't the same race as them. If I were to follow your logic, I must assume that you also found movies like Fruitvale Station, Selma, and 12 Years a Slave "Xenophobic" and "Racist". After all, those movies feature a race of people who were victims of violence at the hands of people who aren't the same race as them.
I'm not saying the film is racist (I think some ways it's offensive but not in a racist sense). I'm saying it's satire Falls flat on its ass.

1st. the social justice Warrior types are people who ***** online, complete Hypocrites and don't do anything productive, these people not only actually do something but you can argue that it's Noble. their actions at the beginning save this tribe from a group of murderous militia.

2. as far as my knowledge goes cannibalistic tribes like this don't exist at least not anymore, at best the very anti-outsider but even then I don't think it would go to this extreme(I could be wrong). I stated many times before tribes being murdered and cleared out is a real world problem. that's why I think it's a little offensive, this film isn't going to make the situation worse but it may turn people away from looking at the issue (probably not but still), and the fact of the situation doesn't exist makes the satire run on insane troll logic. It would be like me making a satire on ebooks and making it about if we switch to ebooks all the trees will need to be cut down. social commentary needs to be completely grounded or completely exaggerated. this movie fails to me in both departments.

You?re allowed to like a movie. you had more fun than I did and that?s good but don't chastise me for not liking it and call me a sjw cry baby. people allowed to dislike things too.

ps. soory four pour spelin. I usually don't like writing post this long

springheeljack said:
I think it would be a good idea if they just made a movie about the making of a movie like this. It would be funny to see them get all the fake blood and gore together and watching the actors trying to get into character and laugh at the ridiculousness of it all
probably more watchable then the film