The Humble THQ Bundle

Neonit

New member
Dec 24, 2008
477
0
0
Yeah, i was wondering whenever to make a topic about it. When i read my email today i was.... Surprised to say the least o_O

This really does seem like desperation, i mean, those games are not old, they are in fact quite new. Not bad either.

Im glad seeing major publisher doing this but.... it really does seems like a desperate move.

If anything, its a good way to get some good cheap games. Hope it will work out for them.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Not gonna lie, really wish they would remove the DRM from this pack. I'd buy it in a second if I could get those games without tying them to Steam. Would like to be able to play them when I happen to not be signed into Steam and my internet shits out, as it's known to do.

And are they really making much money from this? The bundles usually make a few million, which is peanuts compared to what the Publishers usually make. THQ's situation must be pretty dire indeed.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,314
0
0
I'm not sure what surprised me more about this, that THQ is doing a charity bundle or that THQ has somehow ended up on some people's "evul publishur" list which baffles me, sure SR3 was so busy being "wacky" that it forgot to refine the actual gameplay and Armageddon was a dud but THQ has never done anything to annoy me and has published several great franchises. My only regret here is the timing, I'm pouring all my spending money into a $900 computer so there isn't much left for new games.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
Cody Hargreaves said:
Everyone should buy this even if they have one or two of the games. Just to help out THQ.
No. No, no no. You can't get away with selling shovelware and badly made licensed crap for that long without consequences, and you certainly shouldn't be propped up.

This is a clear indicator that THQ won't see 2013 out.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
THQ is a fairly gamer-friendly developer
I'm not sure if you're serious there. Several of their in-house developers are seriously dickish towards gamers, and they're pushing online passes now.

Their "hard times" are their own doing, and the people who pushed those decisions will not take a hit regardless, but nor will this "fire sale" benefit anyone but them.

That being said, I'd still do it if the games interested me. But the money would go to charity and the Humble tip, because seriously, I don'twant to support THQ.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
ResonanceSD said:
Cody Hargreaves said:
Everyone should buy this even if they have one or two of the games. Just to help out THQ.
No. No, no no. You can't get away with selling shovelware and badly made licensed crap for that long without consequences, and you certainly shouldn't be propped up.

This is a clear indicator that THQ won't see 2013 out.
Indeed, I think "helping them out" at this point probably sends the wrong message.
 

Baralak

New member
Dec 9, 2009
1,244
0
0
KingsGambit said:
I already own them all, else I would definitely have bought the pack. Hope they release SR4, that should make them a pretty penny.
That's half the reason I want to get this, just to help get Saints Row 4 funded.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
kyosai7 said:
KingsGambit said:
I already own them all, else I would definitely have bought the pack. Hope they release SR4, that should make them a pretty penny.
That's half the reason I want to get this, just to help get Saints Row 4 funded.
Volition are fully capable of holding a Kickstarter, aren't they?
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,314
0
0
ResonanceSD said:
No. No, no no. You can't get away with selling shovelware and badly made licensed crap for that long without consequences
Actually when you are also responsible for Saints row, Red Faction, Dawn of War, Company of Heroes, Darksiders, Supreme Commander, Metro 2033, ect. I think you can be forgiven.
Zachary Amaranth said:
I'm not sure if you're serious there. Several of their in-house developers are seriously dickish towards gamers,
Who? I remeber the one guy who had something to do with Saints Row make some ignorant comments about used games, but that isn't THQ's fault anyway

and they're pushing online passes now.
You know I was going to type up a huge rant about this but I'm lazy so you get the short version: Online passes are not that bad. I have played plenty of used games with that content missing and never noticed, hell I wasn't even aware RAGE had one till someone told me. Also on one hand I fully support used games and am a regular customer at my local GameStop but on the other hand I can see why devs are hostile to the concept and I think Online passes are a decent compromise, certainly better than a PC situation where DRM eliminates used sales completely.
 

Baralak

New member
Dec 9, 2009
1,244
0
0
ResonanceSD said:
kyosai7 said:
KingsGambit said:
I already own them all, else I would definitely have bought the pack. Hope they release SR4, that should make them a pretty penny.
That's half the reason I want to get this, just to help get Saints Row 4 funded.
Volition are fully capable of holding a Kickstarter, aren't they?
I think THQ owns Volition. I could be wrong, though.
 

Jay Knowles

New member
Aug 24, 2010
72
0
0
I'm going to get this solely because Dawn of War 1 (pre soulstorm expansion) and company of heroes are in my top 10 games, and because I have a glimmer of hope that one day they'll make another DoW/ CoH game worthy of the name.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
major_chaos said:
Actually when you are also responsible for Saints row, Red Faction, Dawn of War, Company of Heroes, Darksiders, Supreme Commander, Metro 2033, ect. I think you can be forgiven.
When your current record involves gutting or killing a couple of those franchises, and ignoring others to MAKE shovelware....No you can't.

THQ isn't the same company it was as little as three years ago. You're advocating propping up a company based on some loyalty to what it used to be, but that won't bring it back.

Zachary Amaranth said:
Who? I remeber the one guy who had something to do with Saints Row make some ignorant comments about used games, but that isn't THQ's fault anyway
Only their successes count, then?

I have played plenty of used games with that content missing and never noticed, hell I wasn't even aware RAGE had one till someone told me.
Yes, and when Saints Row 3 locked one of its most heavily advertised features behind an online pass, did you not notice that?

Don't make excuses for game devs. This isn't seeing "both sides," it's contrition to one side.

RAGE was trivial. Unfortunately, not all games are RAGE.

Actually, that's not unfortunate. I hear the game was mediocrity on a stick.
 

The_Waspman

New member
Sep 14, 2011
569
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Actually, that's not unfortunate. I hear the game was mediocrity on a stick.
Calling RAGE mediocre is being far far too kind.

Sure, its not [Prototype] bad, but when a 20 hour game turns into a total grindfest after a tenth of its gametime (making it feel a whole hell of a lot longer) then you know theres something wrong with it.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,314
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
THQ isn't the same company it was as little as three years ago. You're advocating propping up a company based on some loyalty to what it used to be, but that won't bring it back.
Yes well the company being dead doesn't offer much hope either, I'm willing to give them a lot of extra chances to hopfuly not see those IPs die forever, espicaly with a new metro game and a ambitious WH40k RPG in the works

Only their successes count, then?
No, but I think THQ has more control over what games come out of their studios then they have over what tripe comes out the studio execs mouth.


Yes, and when Saints Row 3 locked one of its most heavily advertised features behind an online pass, did you not notice that?
Well not technically seeing as I played on PC which as I said has been putting up with used sales simply not existing for a long time, but on top of that I could be wrong but I don't remember the MP ever being a main selling point of SR3, hell I think I saw the purple dildo more in the marketing then the MP.



Don't make excuses for game devs.
I just get tired of the constant stream of "whhhaaa evul publishur" that constantly gets directed at everyone who isn't valve, especially in this case seeing as some people actually sound like they want THQ to die and that just seems petty to me.
 

deathbydeath

New member
Jun 28, 2010
1,363
0
0
deathbydeath said:
Solo-Wing said:
EA indie bundle wat?
The EA Indie Bundle on Steam is a bit different. It still cost $15, which is more than the average price of an average Humble Bundle

I'd like EA to attempt Humble Bundle though, letting consumers affect the price. Just to see them not believing their own bullshit about how sales and the like affect IP value negatively
I was generally talking about EA using the modifier "indie" to describe lower-budget games they published, and how I am a fan of the idea. I wasn't computing it to the Humble Bundles, hence the lack of the word "Humble" in the sentence.
 

deathbydeath

New member
Jun 28, 2010
1,363
0
0
cmdrmonkey said:
The games in this bundle are so "meh" I think I'd rather spend my dollar on a coke honestly.
SR3 is a fairly good non-cover shooter from what I've played, and Darksiders is worth a shot. Besides, cokes are for scrubs :p