Well since I own a PS3 and am not burned out on zombie games like everyone else(haven't bought one since... I don't know. Resident Evil 2?), I think I'll go pick this up.
Pffff, the REAL Escort Quest: The Game would be ICO on the PS2. I never got that far into it because it's too hard (shut up it is) but it was really good. You basically lead a mute girl around by the hand the whole game and I swear he's trying to dislocate her shoulder by how hard he pulls on her sometimes.LetalisK said:For what it's worth, the reviews seem to be indicating that Ellie is an asset much more often than she is a liability. In Jim Sterling's review, he noted how it was actually a little immersion breaking to see the enemies completely ignoring her in favor of concentrating on him even though she's right in front of them.The Wykydtron said:Yay well written characters. Oh and children. Because you can't have an emotional story in a zombie game without having to sacrifice yourself/other people for a little girl 50 times in a row.
I find it interesting that this game is basically one big escort quest, though. XD
I'm going to guess... Nanako?The Wykydtron said:One child character in the history of gaming I have actually liked. No, not Clementine, although she was tolerable.
Not only do I find it odd, I find it even stranger that people keep saying those things right after I posted about the fact that Sony owns Naughty Dog to correct one of the earlier comments. I guess it just goes to show that most people don't actually read any of the posts in the thread they comment in.Arslan Aladeen said:Anyone else finding it odd how many people are hoping that a game that's made by Naught Dog, a company exclusive to Sony, gets ported to other systems? I thought this would be common knowledge by now. Don't hear about people going "I hope Mario Galaxy gets ported to ____."
I might skip some posts if it's multiple pages long. To be fair though, some of those peoples may have been writing up their comments before you posted and just didn't see yours.Vivi22 said:Not only do I find it odd, I find it even stranger that people keep saying those things right after I posted about the fact that Sony owns Naughty Dog to correct one of the earlier comments. I guess it just goes to show that most people don't actually read any of the posts in the thread they comment in.Arslan Aladeen said:Anyone else finding it odd how many people are hoping that a game that's made by Naught Dog, a company exclusive to Sony, gets ported to other systems? I thought this would be common knowledge by now. Don't hear about people going "I hope Mario Galaxy gets ported to ____."
I personally don't want to buy a $300 console that might not get any new games developed for it once the PS4 comes out, just for the sake of playing a few older exclusives. Though, I might have adopted the PS4 as my new gaming console if this was one of the first games to come out for it.Vivi22 said:How is it weird to release a high profile console exclusive for a console with, what is it now, 60 million units out there? Especially when they're able to build on the knowledge they've developed over three previous games. I'm also not sure I see how there's no point in buying a PS3 now. It's cheaper than ever and has almost seven years worth of exclusives to catch up on for those who don't have one. If anything, there's never a better time to buy one.Quantupus said:Exactly. It seems weird that they would release such a high profile console exclusive so late in the console cycle. I might have bought a PS4 to play this game, but there's no point in buying a PS3 at this point.
Metacritic breaks out games by individual consoles. So it makes sense that games with exclusivity to one console would have more reviews by comparison. Every review is in one bucket as opposed to some split between platforms. Tomb Raider, BioShock Infinite and such were multiplatform, while The Last of Us and Ni No Kuni are PS3 exclusives.LetalisK said:I was curious how The Last of Us had 42 critic reviews before even being released, yet Tomb Raider Bioshock Infinite have 27 reviews and MLB 13 has 36. Then I looked at Ni No Kuni with its 89 critic reviews. Is this disparity in number of critic reviews normal?
Sorry, but I don't understand this attitude. Even ignoring the fact that previous Playstation consoles were still supported for years after the release of the next gen system, you're basically saying that you'd rather buy an expensive new console for one title, with no guarantee anything else will come out that you'll really be interested in for, potentially, years, instead of buying a cheaper console which you can actually look at the library for it and quantify how many games you missed that you're interested in. And you wouldn't even have to get it now since the price will inevitably drop over the next year or two.Quantupus said:I personally don't want to buy a $300 console that might not get any new games developed for it once the PS4 comes out, just for the sake of playing a few older exclusives. Though, I might have adopted the PS4 as my new gaming console if this was one of the first games to come out for it.Vivi22 said:How is it weird to release a high profile console exclusive for a console with, what is it now, 60 million units out there? Especially when they're able to build on the knowledge they've developed over three previous games. I'm also not sure I see how there's no point in buying a PS3 now. It's cheaper than ever and has almost seven years worth of exclusives to catch up on for those who don't have one. If anything, there's never a better time to buy one.Quantupus said:Exactly. It seems weird that they would release such a high profile console exclusive so late in the console cycle. I might have bought a PS4 to play this game, but there's no point in buying a PS3 at this point.