Tripwires/ mines/ IED's. After war they still kill thousands. What's worse is he way in which they don't often kill, but rather maim and scar people for life. The ultimate wrecker of one's life is a landmine accident.
We won't need them if the conspiracy theories about the LHC are true. Even if they aren't, we'll probably develop something equally destructive fairly soon anyway.Furburt said:Nuclear Weapons.
Sure, it means we might have a few more wars, but I'd take a few hundred thousand dead over the spectre of total annihilation hanging over our heads anyday.
Don't you find the little buggers cute at all?Hubilub said:Sharks.
Because then I'll finally dare go to the pool again without having to worry about someone releasing those hideous monsters for the sake of killing me.
If that was real, I'd say it was worst then all of the flamethrowers/bio-warfare weapons combined. Also, stay on topic guys, your going off saying sharks are bad and whatnot; remember "Weapons", even if the sharks had laser beams attached to their frickin heads.Snork Maiden said:Cerebral Bore is pretty awful. Should ban that one.
what about piranhas and squids?Hubilub said:Sharks.
Because then I'll finally dare go to the pool again without having to worry about someone releasing those hideous monsters for the sake of killing me.
I think that basically ends the thread. XDFurburt said:Nuclear Weapons.
Sure, it means we might have a few more wars, but I'd take a few hundred thousand dead over the spectre of total annihilation hanging over our heads anyday.