.... Except for the fact they basically spawned a new musical generation for the late 80s early 90s. They brought grunge to the forefront. If it wasn't for them, the music we would be seeing nowadays.PeePantz said:I agree. In fact, when they got huge after Kurt Cobain's death, I despised them. I used to like them somewhat until all those newly acquired fans who sprung up due to his suicide, decided to shove all this love for the band down everyones throat and proclaim them to be the best band, the most influential band, blah blah blah. Nope people, you're wrong. They were slightly less then okay and had very limited musical talent. Cobain knew three chords and their drummer had more talent in his big toe than the rest of the band combined which I guess would just be the yet mentioned shitty bassist Chris Novoselic and the super emo lead singer.xDarc said:I never really cared for Nirvana; and I was in Jr. High at the time when they were big and had to hide it.
Sure, maybe they weren't the best band in the world (coming from someone who never really cared for them either), but usually the first of the kind isn't going to be absolutely perfect.
Not to mention Dave Grohl branched off and had an insane amount of very good songs these past few years. But now we are getting into opinion territory, so I am gonna move it on to...
Edit: Completely missed the part where you said Dave was talented. Must've bounced right off.
OT: Metallica.
I just... don't see what they have brought to the table, and I don't see any hidden potential in there songs.
Whenever I hear something they sing, I immediately think they are making fun of themselves. I will go as far to say a terrible band.
U2.
Although it may just not be my style of music.