The problem with multiplayer games.

Recommended Videos

thejboy88

New member
Aug 29, 2010
1,515
0
0
Hi everyone.

Now I know a huge number of gamers love multiplayer, and many of them will hate me for saying this, but its just something I've wanted to say for some time.

Multiplayer is becoming a detriment to the video game industry. It seems to me these days that games manufacturers and designers are putting more and more effort into refining and improving the look, gameplay and mechanics of the multiplayers aspects of modern games than they are with the more solo aspects of it.

Take for example, first person shooters. Now I know I've already posted a thread regaridng how I feel about these games but lets just look at the multiplayer aspect for the time being. Have you noticed that whenever game developers, gamers, or even game reviewers talk about these games, the multiplayer (or lack thereof) is considered to be one of the most important elements. If a game does not even have one, it is alsmost always considered a let-down there and then, without even giving the game a chance.

Games with heavy multiplayer focus also seem to lack very much in the story department. The writing is often ear-gratingly bad as is the dialogue and for the most part it's only the graphics with improve over time.

I will say this once, just so everyone who reads this know how I feel on that matter:

"GOOD GRAPHICS DOES NOT MAKE A GOOD GAME!!!"

Now, lets move on to pc-type games. If such games have a multiplayer element to them then something like a bad internet connection will sometimes result in the game being unable to rub properly, even if you did not want to use the multiplayer. Steam games being a particular problem of this type.

The community of muliplayer gamers is laso a problem for the image of gamers as a whole. Yes i know that many will just mind their own business and not offend anybody but for the few that spout profanity, insulting behaviour and just general unpleasantness, gamers image in hte mainstream society is being tarnished. We have enough problems with gaming being accused of causing every problem under the sun without this lot making things worse.

Single player campaigns are becoming shorter and shorter these days, just as multiplayer is becoming bigger. I do not know if the formers is a consequence of the latter, but if it is, then it's just once more problem that multiplayer is causing us. Single player campaigns or stories should ALWAYS be the focus of the game developers, not the side-activity.

I'm sure your all tired of my rambling so I will just wrap things up. If you love multiplayer, I mean no offence towards any of you. Multiplayer games may sell great and add to the coffers of the industry, but if it does that by sacrificing all the elements which should make games great, story, character, innovation, individual experiences, then I have to say, that is not a trade-off I would ever make myself.
 

JRCB

New member
Jan 11, 2009
4,387
0
0
I agree completely. I love myself some good singleplayer, and I've kind of had it with a lot of multiplayer games. They've just all sort of become the same.
 

Talon_Skywarp

New member
Aug 2, 2010
310
0
0
Well said.

Story and game play should always come first. The problem with multi player, as Yahtzee said, is that if no one plays them, it becomes a ghost town and therefore completely pointless.

And sticking random online features on games feels cheap.

Then again I play JRPG's so I can avoid all this because I'm too busy following the adventures of weirdly dress teenagers who have more emotional problems than the Smiths.
 

EcHoFiiVe

New member
Nov 28, 2010
355
0
0
I love multiplayer and I agree. I think the problem is developers are constantly trying to out do their past achievements, which is a mistake because in doing so, by precedent, you screw up the games. They need to find a balance between simplicity and complexity.
 

PeePantz

New member
Sep 23, 2010
1,100
0
0
I see opinions presented as facts.

Games have evolved and multiplayer is just a way that games have expanded and become better. This is not to say that it should focus on the multiplayer and let the main story mode go by the wayside. However, due to the progression of games, it's hard to imagine a lot of games not having multiplayer.

Everyone know that COD games and other of that ilk have become mainly multiplayer with a little sprinkle of singleplayer. Know this before purchasing. Understand that despite what you want, does not make it so. MAG is a game that is 100% multiplayer. Look at the games like COD or MOH as multiplayer first with a bonus of a short singleplayer campaign. It's just the opposite of what you were used to seeing. Things change.

There are still games with great story mode or singleplayer, if that's what you want. Just don't buy something if it's not your cup-o-tea.
 

pyrosaw

New member
Mar 18, 2010
1,837
0
0
I enjoy multiplayer, but I would like multiplayer only games or equal amount of work done on both. What's the point of having it if it doesn't have any polishing done on it? Multiplayer only games are nice to me, like Team Fortress 2, Warhawk, Blacklight: Tango Down(Game sucks.)
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
I find it is quite simply because multiplayer requires much much less work than singleplayer.
 

Jester00

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2010
547
0
21
thejboy88 said:
Multiplayer is becoming a detriment to the video game industry. It seems to me these days that games manufacturers and designers are putting more and more effort into refining and improving the look, gameplay and mechanics of the multiplayers aspects of modern games than they are with the more solo aspects of it.

Take for example, first person shooters. Now I know I've already posted a thread regaridng how I feel about these games but lets just look at the multiplayer aspect for the time being. Have you noticed that whenever game developers, gamers, or even game reviewers talk about these games, the multiplayer (or lack thereof) is considered to be one of the most important elements. If a game does not even have one, it is alsmost always considered a let-down there and then, without even giving the game a chance.

Games with heavy multiplayer focus also seem to lack very much in the story department. The writing is often ear-gratingly bad as is the dialogue and for the most part it's only the graphics with improve over time.
every cod since cod4 had an epic multiplayer AND a great story.
 

OmegaAlucard777

New member
Sep 20, 2010
124
0
0
I am okay with multiplayer... But what I hate above anything. Is when games feel like they HAVE to put multiplayer in their game because it's the new fad and it takes time away from the awesome story. There are some games that shouldn't have a multiplayer mode.

Case in point: Mass Effect 3. In my opinion, there is no reason for Mass Effect 3 to have multiplayer other that to join in on the fad. I am perfectly happy with its awesome long story. If they want to have multiplayer, do a Mass Effect MMORPG like they are doing with KoToR. That's my 2 cents on multiplayer.