Tom from MySpace.CelestDaer said:So, who's Tom? At the end, he says "Oh, hi Tom!" I think...?
Tom from MySpace.CelestDaer said:So, who's Tom? At the end, he says "Oh, hi Tom!" I think...?
wickedness is hard to kill. (I'd say evil but that's extreme)RealRT said:So, Fox let Fantastic Four 1 and 2 and also X-Men 3 and Wolverine happen, but they all but officially axed this.
Fox, why are you still alive?
Um... That Superman v. Batman: Dawn of Frank Miller's Anus was put together by WB so they would have something to show at SDCC. There's nothing leaked about it.DarkhoIlow said:"Leaked by hackers" yeah right. This is the same type of "leak" of the trailer of Superman vs Batman trailer just to get DC fans some hope and hype everyone up because they are losing the war against Marvel.
Stuff don't leak unless the big heads at these companies/studios let them happen.
This Deadpool trailer was just a "let's test the waters" on a new Deadpool movie with Ryan Reynolds to see how fans would react.
There's a thing in production design called an animatic. Essentially, it's just an animated storyboard. Most are typically light on animation, being nothing more than slide shows to help with timing and pace and to get a feel for how shots will transition from one to the next. Some are more animated, with actual limb articulation and some mouth movement. Others will have music and or voice work accompanying them (usually recordings from a table read of the script). At the end of the day, an animatic is a proof of concept.Therumancer said:Well, my initial thoughts on the subject are that it was an initial leak, and then Fox found out they can't make it happen, so want to pull it. Of course then again trying to pull something off the internet (which they know is impossible) just ensures that more people will want to see it as a result, which could be the idea too.
At any rate if Blur is busy, and Ryan Reynolds has other commitments (unknown), it makes a degree of sense that they might not have wanted this out there because after all, without the same team that made the test footage, they can't produce a Deadpool movie like that one.
It also occurs to me that the popularity of the Deadpool character means that they might have gotten blocked by Marvel pretty quickly. If they wanted to do the movie as an animated feature, like that trailer, their contract for X-men affiliated characters might not apply to works of animation. I'm looking towards how Marvel Animation Studios seems to be able to do it's own thing with direct to DVD movies and such. Doing the things they want Deadpool to do with enough live action to avoid it being an animated movie could be tricky if I'm not wrong, and it would probably expand the budget greatly. While it's doable of course, imagine what it would take to do that short trailer with all real people and stuntmen. That entire animated feature probably cost less than leveling that car, and producing a fake version of it to show seperatly so they could show an actor tumbling in the still shot holding up the drawing alone would. That would be a pretty big "money" scene I'd imagine, and you'd expect a lot of that kind of thing.
My favorites of those being Dare Devil / Deadpool 97 followed byLieju said:As far as the actual clip goes...
Hm, I dunno, he looks great, but how well-written Deadpool is (to me) is determined by how it handles the more serious and dark aspects of the character.
(And I?m not talking about the violence and him killing people.)
Joe Kelly?s run on Deadpool is one of my favourite things in American superhero comics, and that was because of how it balanced humor and actual tragedy, and the issues it tackled, such as what being a hero means, what ?doing the right thing? actually is, etc.
Or Deadpool?s relationships with his supporting cast, him basically ruining Weasel?s and Blind Al?s lives, but there being actual attachment there as well. Not that those relationships weren?t also very twisted.
Which reminds me, I don?t wanna hear anything about a Deadpool movie that doesn?t have Weasel and Blind Al.
I meant the leaked footage of the SvB trailer in my comment.spoonybard.hahs said:Um... That Superman v. Batman: Dawn of Frank Miller's Anus was put together by WB so they would have something to show at SDCC. There's nothing leaked about it.DarkhoIlow said:"Leaked by hackers" yeah right. This is the same type of "leak" of the trailer of Superman vs Batman trailer just to get DC fans some hope and hype everyone up because they are losing the war against Marvel.
Stuff don't leak unless the big heads at these companies/studios let them happen.
This Deadpool trailer was just a "let's test the waters" on a new Deadpool movie with Ryan Reynolds to see how fans would react.
However, the Deadpool footage is almost certainly a leak. FOX had no theatrical presence this year at SDCC and the test was done three years ago.
Yes, because five people on a panel can stop 300 plus from using their smart phones. In a darkened room no less.DarkhoIlow said:I meant the leaked footage of the SvB trailer in my comment.spoonybard.hahs said:Um... That Superman v. Batman: Dawn of Frank Miller's Anus was put together by WB so they would have something to show at SDCC. There's nothing leaked about it.DarkhoIlow said:"Leaked by hackers" yeah right. This is the same type of "leak" of the trailer of Superman vs Batman trailer just to get DC fans some hope and hype everyone up because they are losing the war against Marvel.
Stuff don't leak unless the big heads at these companies/studios let them happen.
This Deadpool trailer was just a "let's test the waters" on a new Deadpool movie with Ryan Reynolds to see how fans would react.
However, the Deadpool footage is almost certainly a leak. FOX had no theatrical presence this year at SDCC and the test was done three years ago.
Not everyone lives in US or has attended SDCC to see that trailer. And we wouldn't of have seen it if WB wouldn't of "let" someone leak the trailer taken from a smartphone.
A day.RatGouf said:I'm so excited this clip is being hosted by The Escapist despite this odd & disturbing history!
....
Wait. How long until Fox sends an order to this website to stop showing it?
If there's ever an update with the article (as in, the two that you can see they did, and one they were forced to do) then the facebook comments automatically get deleted, regardless of whether they were good or bad.circularlogic88 said:Seriously? Whoever is in charge of the Facebook comments section can go to hell. I swear, if it's not anything but glowing praise over the article or it's contents, it immediately gets deleted.