Yeah, thats the one I am getting. I am too poor to drop £70 on a puzzle and the £12 one has almost the same solution as the normal cube, which makes me happy.Kathinka said:i think i saw one of them smaller 12-sided ones in the same shop you told me to look for that huge ************ for. it's significantly cheaper with around 12 punds, but if i'm getting something, i go for all-out insanity^^
Ah yes, I've been warned that the rules change a little when the cube gets bigger. That you can get the edges and faces together and pretend it's a 3x3x3 cube, but will be surprised by some special cases. That your fingers will twitch whenever you think. That your mind will trickle out of your ears. But I digress.fanklok said:Be prepared for the mind numbing horror that is paritythekrimzonguard said:I went on rubik craze a couple of years ago, and can still do one - just about. I think my method was F2L; cross on final side; place final corners; rotate final corners; place final edges.
My best ever time was 42 seconds, a number that I'm very satisfied to settle on!
Next up is solving a 4x4x4 or 5x5x5 cube...
![]()
Yeah I can solve a normal 3x3x3 in bout 1:15 (average ish) using that beginner method and I can't be arsed to learn anything more complex.
And I can solve the 4x4x4 and 5x5x5 and 2x2x2 (no accomplishment there).
When in doubt Ebay.thekrimzonguard said:The real question is, "I've heard that the largest ever made was 7x7x7, where can I get my hands on that?"
Also, on a 4x4x4, is there any difference between the centre squares of the same colour? For example, does the same red centre panel always have to be close to the same corner when solved? I'm guessing not, since the rotation of the centre tiles doesn't matter on a 3x3x3.
What about the single-colour-but-not-centre tiles on a 5x5x5?