The slut issue

Shadowstar38

New member
Jul 20, 2011
2,204
0
0
Mortai Gravesend said:
Shadowstar38 said:
But if the term is accurate to the person in question, and they get offended, they are having a hard time taking the truth.
Or perhaps you're just having a hard time noticing the connotations of that word?
Please expand on why you would think that.
 

Dreiko_v1legacy

New member
Aug 28, 2008
4,696
0
0
Hmm, what would be the non-offensive alternative I wonder? "Promiscuous" has a negative connotation to it as well, so does "town bike" and other such terms.


Would "overly sexed" be good? Is there even a possible equivalent to "liar" or "gamer" when the subject is "women who have tons of sex"?
 

Aris Khandr

New member
Oct 6, 2010
2,353
0
0
Dreiko said:
Hmm, what would be the non-offensive alternative I wonder? "Promiscuous" has a negative connotation to it as well, so does "town bike" and other such terms.


Would "overly sexed" be good? Is there even a possible equivalent to "liar" or "gamer" when the subject is "women who have tons of sex"?
Try "vivacious". It means "full of life and energy", and works rather nicely as a non-derogatory term for someone who enjoys sex.
 

Shadowstar38

New member
Jul 20, 2011
2,204
0
0
Mortai Gravesend said:
Not hard. It's generally an insult. It comes with disapproval. That has jack shit to do with a hard time taking the truth. It's like thinking that calling someone a fag is the same as calling them gay. Clearly if they take the first offensively they're just having a hard time taking the truth. Or maybe that's blatantly wrong because the word itself is one that is generally used as an insult and that's why they get offended.
I think that if it's an insult or not is base purely on context. Taken at face value, without, you know, the person saying it being pissed off at the time, the word means exactly what it's meant to describe.
 

Dreiko_v1legacy

New member
Aug 28, 2008
4,696
0
0
Aris Khandr said:
Dreiko said:
Hmm, what would be the non-offensive alternative I wonder? "Promiscuous" has a negative connotation to it as well, so does "town bike" and other such terms.


Would "overly sexed" be good? Is there even a possible equivalent to "liar" or "gamer" when the subject is "women who have tons of sex"?
Try "vivacious". It means "full of life and energy", and works rather nicely as a non-derogatory term for someone who enjoys sex.

I think that's a bit too aloof and open to interpretation. You definitely can make it sound as such but we're going for a more precise thing here. One that can't be mistaken and explained away as something different than what it is without much effort.
 

Kae

That which exists in the absence of space.
Legacy
Nov 27, 2009
5,792
712
118
Country
The Dreamlands
Gender
Lose 1d20 sanity points.
manic_depressive13 said:
generals3 said:
Because if a word describing your behavior hurts your feelings you have only yourself to blame.
Slut is a slur. That's like calling your flamboyant friend a ****** and saying "Well it describes your behaviour!" It isn't a descriptor. It's a loaded term with extremely negative connotations.
^Listen to this person.

Seriously, it's not hard to understand, it is a derogatory term, it's purpose is to be insulting so of course people are going to feel insulted when you use it to describe them.

Definition form dictionary.com:
An immoral or dissolute woman; prostitute.

Do you now see what's wrong?

If you want to point out the fact that they have a lot of sex without being insulting you better find another word, since English isn't my first language and I don't really speak about sex often I have no idea what this word would be, but I'm sure it exists, if it doesn't then make one up, that's how the language evolves anyway.
 

Aris Khandr

New member
Oct 6, 2010
2,353
0
0
Dreiko said:
Aris Khandr said:
Dreiko said:
Hmm, what would be the non-offensive alternative I wonder? "Promiscuous" has a negative connotation to it as well, so does "town bike" and other such terms.


Would "overly sexed" be good? Is there even a possible equivalent to "liar" or "gamer" when the subject is "women who have tons of sex"?
Try "vivacious". It means "full of life and energy", and works rather nicely as a non-derogatory term for someone who enjoys sex.

I think that's a bit too aloof and open to interpretation. You definitely can make it sound as such but we're going for a more precise thing here. One that can't be mistaken and explained away as something different than what it is without much effort.
If we're looking to coin a term, perhaps "dionysian", after the Greek Dionysus, the god of wine and ecstasy (not the drug).
 

Stasisesque

New member
Nov 25, 2008
983
0
0
Aris Khandr said:
Dreiko said:
Aris Khandr said:
Dreiko said:
Hmm, what would be the non-offensive alternative I wonder? "Promiscuous" has a negative connotation to it as well, so does "town bike" and other such terms.


Would "overly sexed" be good? Is there even a possible equivalent to "liar" or "gamer" when the subject is "women who have tons of sex"?
Try "vivacious". It means "full of life and energy", and works rather nicely as a non-derogatory term for someone who enjoys sex.

I think that's a bit too aloof and open to interpretation. You definitely can make it sound as such but we're going for a more precise thing here. One that can't be mistaken and explained away as something different than what it is without much effort.
If we're looking to coin a term, perhaps "dionysian", after the Greek Dionysus, the god of wine and ecstasy (not the drug).
Not to be a buzzkill, but you wouldn't be coining a term. Camille Paglia did that in the late 1980s.

I do like Dionysian as a term for sexually open women, though.
 

Aris Khandr

New member
Oct 6, 2010
2,353
0
0
Eh, my dictionary didn't have it, and Firefox also didn't think it was a word. As long as it works, though.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
Problem: when did "slut" come to mean "a woman who is honest about her sex drive, and enjoys sex?" Because I never heard it used that way until the slut walk movement started up. Up until that point, I'd always understood it to mean "woman who sleeps around to an unsafe degree. Female equivalent of man-whore." Why are we supposed to act like that's a good thing again?

Edit: more specifically, it has connotations of using men for sex and casting them aside like old laundry. A woman who has sex with a lot of men isn't a slut. A woman who hits on random strangers with the express intent of getting something from them, whether the sex itself or something in return for sex, and who -- importantly -- doesn't give a rip about the feelings of her targets, would in fact be a slut. I kind of feel like "woman who enjoys sex" is an attempt to re-define it as something positive, not the actual traditional definition of the word.
 

JimB

New member
Apr 1, 2012
2,180
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Problem: when did "slut" come to mean "a woman who is honest about her sex drive, and enjoys sex?"
Outside of porn, I'm guessing more or less never.
 

GTwander

New member
Mar 26, 2008
469
0
0
The word 'slut' only tends to offend women.
Call a man a slut and he's bound to turn to his friends and grimace.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
JimB said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Problem: when did "slut" come to mean "a woman who is honest about her sex drive, and enjoys sex?"
Outside of porn, I'm guessing more or less never.
And yet if you ask anyone involved with the slut walk movement (which is ultimately the reason we're having this conversation), they'll tell you that's exactly what it means, and since that's not a bad thing, we shouldn't be using the word as a pejorative. It absolutely boggles the mind.
 

Stasisesque

New member
Nov 25, 2008
983
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
JimB said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Problem: when did "slut" come to mean "a woman who is honest about her sex drive, and enjoys sex?"
Outside of porn, I'm guessing more or less never.
And yet if you ask anyone involved with the slut walk movement (which is ultimately the reason we're having this conversation), they'll tell you that's exactly what it means, and since that's not a bad thing, we shouldn't be using the word as a pejorative. It absolutely boggles the mind.
I don't know what a Slut Walk is where you're from, but here they are protests against rape, not about enjoying sex. To participate in a Slut Walk is to demonstrate a woman should not have to change her attitude or clothing to avoid getting raped, but that people shouldn't rape in the first place.
 

Shadowstar38

New member
Jul 20, 2011
2,204
0
0
Mortai Gravesend said:
Except it'd be absurd to take it at face value, even if it'd make the world nice and simple. There's a social context to the word. It doesn't vanish.
Always assuming that a word has the more negative connotation is just as absurd. A large number of words can be used with other meanings, but you ant let your mind default on the lesser one.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
Stasisesque said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
JimB said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Problem: when did "slut" come to mean "a woman who is honest about her sex drive, and enjoys sex?"
Outside of porn, I'm guessing more or less never.
And yet if you ask anyone involved with the slut walk movement (which is ultimately the reason we're having this conversation), they'll tell you that's exactly what it means, and since that's not a bad thing, we shouldn't be using the word as a pejorative. It absolutely boggles the mind.
I don't know what a Slut Walk is where you're from, but here they are protests against rape, not about enjoying sex. To participate in a Slut Walk is to demonstrate a woman should not have to change her attitude or clothing to avoid getting raped, but that people shouldn't rape in the first place.
Look up why they're called slut walks. It involved a cop suggesting that women probably shouldn't walk alone in a bad part of town "dressed like a slut," and it snowballed from there. It's primarily a protest against rape, but it's the use of the word "slut" that got everyone pissed off in the first place, and that definition is the reason frequently given for why the word itself is so offensive.