Isn't it also some online pvp-pve thing too?This is basically your Bloodborne 2. The Duskbloods. Switch 2 only.
Presumably. It's a SOULS game by FS, so I wouldn't expect anything less otherwise.Isn't it also some online pvp-pve thing too?
I mean, Sony paid for Bloodborne exclusivity, and they haven't done anything with the ip since, despite there clearly being an audience for it, and From Soft being down for having another go, considering they're now doing a legally distinct version with a different patron. So honestly, joke's on Sony.Bloodborne fans finally got their sequel, but as an April Fool's joke Nintendo paid for it to be exclusive this time.
It's Bayonetta 2 all over again. Platinum went to Microsoft? They said no. Platinum eent to Sony? Sony said they will think about it. AKA, no. Those companies are the trueI mean, Sony paid for Bloodborne exclusivity, and they haven't done anything with the ip since, despite there clearly being an audience for it, and From Soft being down for having another go, considering they're now doing a legally distinct version with a different patron. So honestly, joke's on Sony.
Good for them!I mean, Sony paid for Bloodborne exclusivity, and they haven't done anything with the ip since, despite there clearly being an audience for it, and From Soft being down for having another go, considering they're now doing a legally distinct version with a different patron. So honestly, joke's on Sony.
This is the worst timeline. I'd rather not have more Bloodborne than have it exclusive to the switch.@CriticalGaming, @Dirty Hipsters & @hanselthecaretaker2.
This is basically your Bloodborne 2. The Duskbloods. Switch 2 only.
Well Sony had to waste all of their money trying to make more live service games instead of games people actually want.I mean, Sony paid for Bloodborne exclusivity, and they haven't done anything with the ip since, despite there clearly being an audience for it, and From Soft being down for having another go, considering they're now doing a legally distinct version with a different patron. So honestly, joke's on Sony.
Quit being such a drama queen. Blame Sony for not acting on a sequel at all. Like I said before, it's Bayonetta 2 all over again. History repeats itself again, because Sony didn't want to do sequel to Demon Souls. Thus Dark Souls was born, and they're still kicking themselves in the head over it.This is the worst timeline. I'd rather not have more Bloodborne than have it exclusive to the switch.
And there you go. Sony fucked up.Why sell Bloodborne 2 and make a ton of money when you can dream about having your own Destiny 2...which doesn't actually make money? I have no idea why companies keep thinking they want their own Destiny game. If Destiny was actually profitable Activision Blizzard would have never let Bungie walk away with it.
Yeah, I'd also rather not have Bayonetta 2 than have it on the Switch.Quit being such a drama queen. Blame Sony for not acting on a sequel at all. Like I said before, it's Bayonetta 2 all over again. History repeats itself again, because Sony didn't want to do sequel to Demon Souls. Thus Dark Souls was born, and they're still kicking themselves in the head over it.
Sucks to be you and you can still cry to Sony and Microsoft. I am sure they will listen to your whiny plight. I regret nothing, and I still thank Nintendo for making Bayonetta 2 possible on Wii U and Switch. The same for Bayonetta 3, despite some of its flaws.Yeah, I'd also rather not have Bayonetta 2 than have it on the Switch.
Oh wait, I still don't.
I noticed the comparison and made a comment on it earlier. Still has a nice combination of both, except your character is a vampire now.Heck, it was more Lies of P than BB, and even though P was compared to BB we're now two steps removed from BB enough that it ain't that no more.