darksuccubus said:
Blackout2012 said:
SaneAmongInsane said:
JimB said:
renaissance_nerd said:
That will not happen which is why most of us are still mad.
Uh huh. Who is "most of us?" How many of you are there? What are your names? Because if you're going to insist that you have some kind of majority behind you, I want some evidence of that.
renaissance_nerd said:
She is censoring/blocking/reprimanding anything she finds offensive, not necessarily what Channel Awesome finds offensive.
Crap. Channel Awesome cannot find anything offensive; Channel Awesome does not have the capacity. Channel Awesome is nothing but a name on a business license and a logo on a graphics card. It is not a person. Only people can be offended by anything.
It's him, me, and 3 other guys.
Four other guys!
Make it 5!
Made an account just for this. Make it 6.
If you have a problem with another co-worker's behavior, or feel that you or someone else has been harassed, YOU CONTACT YOUR MANAGER AND/OR HR. Period. The end. You do not take it to the court of public opinion. This entire debacle was one big HR clusterfuck the second Lupa decided to publicly confront Spoony. Sexual harassment, whether perceived, intentional, or third-party, is an HR issue. If Lupa was some random follower of Spoony's out on the internet, then there would be no issue other than e-drama. But since they are co-workers, unlike 'Nam, there are rules.
Spoony was suspended by HR for violating the company's Twitter policy... after Lupa violated HR policy on Twitter. Ironic, right?
Holly, if you're still reading this thread and want to call yourself an HR Director, I strongly suggest you start signing up for classes. Where everyone else failed in common sense, decency, good taste, or restraint... you failed at your job.