They're not PC developers. They haven't been for a long time. They're just a "game" developers now. If most of their games were PC exclusives then maybe yeah but just about every one of their games had a console release so its unfair to call them PC developers. Would really you call Rockstar a PC developer because a lot of their games are on PC too?GeneralTwinkle said:You're sort of reminding me of Karutomaru. Insisting that Ubisoft were bad because the Wii version of a game was bad, or that a Wii version didn't exist. Understand, valve is a PC developer . Don't expect good things from them on consoles, it won't come. Play it on PC, and stop arguing about the xbox version, which is something they don't give two shits about and no one expects them too, nor really should they. There's no point.Gorilla Gunk said:No they wouldn't. I'm pretty sure Valve could release a game where you play as a sex offender and they still wouldn't lose an ounce of credibility.GeneralTwinkle said:Well games like tf2 have had stupid amounts of extra content, if you payed for all of that you'd be brokeGorilla Gunk said:Almost all the Left 4 Dead DLC was paid, invalidating your argument.GeneralTwinkle said:No, it's because they refuse to have their DLC paid for. MS and Sony won't let free DLC slide, so they don't give it out.Gorilla Gunk said:Valve because seriously fuck them.
"We can't get DLC to the consoles because MS/Sony won't let us!!!"
*Looks at the heaps of awesome DLC Borderlands, Fallout, and Bioware's games get*
Really Valve? Really?
And if that really is the reason Valve is worse then I thought.
"If we can't give it to you free then we're not going to give it to you at all."
In what bizarro world does that make any sort of sense? How is that in any way fair to the customers who bought their games on consoles? Because Sony/MS won't let you release stuff for free you're going to punish US?
I mean, fuck, most people are willing to pay Call of Duty map pack prices so long as we get something.![]()
L4D on the other hand, hasn't had that many actual content patches. They'd feel better about that. Can you blame them for not wanting to get the terrible PR they would get if they released the paid tf2 dlc?
People would have a shit fit, and their company would lose a lot of credibility.
I'm pretty sure they would
TF2 is probably beyond help because its so old (Unless they rerelease it on XBLA/PSN) but really people that played it on consoles never really expected to get all the PC content. Really all they wanted was a map pack or two (That we'd have no problem paying for) and some more patches because the last time I played years ago the game was practically unplayable with almost ever game being hacked and modded. It was a mess and instead of doing the right thing and fixing it and supporting its console players they abandoned it which is a real dick move.
People would have complained anyway about paid dlc on consoles. You wouldn't have, but most people would
God only knows why they stopped supporting the 360 version of L4D/2. Two bits of DLC over almost two years and nothing. They announced another map pack this time last year but nothing happened.
Delayed? Valve makes mistakes, but TF2 DLC wasn't one of them. I'm not sure about this.
Valve may be the greatest developer on PC but on console they're mediocre bordering on bad and when you stop blindly blaming MS/Sony
Yes, they are bad on consoles. Very bad. That doesn't change the fact that MS and Sony still have some blame
But again, Valve can do no wrong and will defend then to the death and enable their stupid decisions so they're never going to learn and fix their problems.
I've already said twice, valve makes mistakes, quite a few infact. Steam is not very good, but I still use it because it's the best we have. They make a ton of mistakes, and not all their games are good. Ricochet is very unpopular, and I hate half life 1/2
And I'm not saying they're all bad. Like I said, they're probably the best thing on PC, but they're shit on consoles and "MS/Sony" and saying "They're a PC developer" is no real excuse. You said MS/Sony have some of the blame with the key word in there being "some." Right now as I see it they have most of the blame. Console players, at least when it comes to Valves games, pay a lot more and deal with a lot more so I don't think its unfair to want some decent support.
And I, like most people who play on consoles, don't have a strong enough PC and right now can't afford one and even then "Just play it on PC" is still a shitty thing to say and unless you're offering to just give me enough money to build my own PC (And yes, before you say anything, I know you can build a PC for cheap but even $500 is out of the question for me at this point) then just that bit of advice to yourself. God knows you guys freak the fuck out when people suggest you play console exclusives on consoles instead of petitioning for ports.
All I really want is for Valve to be the developer everybody says they are, see even a little but of that side of them I hear PC players rave about, because all I'm seeing right now and have been for years is a big fat middle finger.
PS: People didn't really complain much about having to pay for L4D DLC and paying for DLC is just something we have to deal with so I doubt people would have had much if any trouble paying for TF2 DLC. Maybe a few complainers but not enough to be a problem.