PieBrotherTB said:
shrekfan246 said:
Clearly you haven't seen all of the "Worst game evar!" threads where people say things like Dragon Age, Call of Duty, Mass Effect, Final Fantasy, Halo, Half-Life, Gears of War, et al. I'm relatively sure that at least four of those titles were probably brought up in the recent "Objectively bad games" thread.
This is the internet, you don't even have to look hard to find people (different people, to be fair) who will drop their hate on something that you quite innocently enjoyed, or indeed, anything.
My point was more that if you want to look at games "objectively" (as if there is such a thing), none of
those particular titles are explicitly
bad. They all function, they've all sold tons of copies and spanned multiple titles, they all have very tight, well-developed controls, they've all garnered quite substantial fan-bases, and they all still look fairly decent when played today. Which is more than can be said for the likes of
E.T.,
Bubsy 3D,
Daikatana,
Superman 64, or
Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing, which were completely terrible/flat out broken on release and have aged even worse.
People are completely entitled to their opinions, I don't deny that. In fact, I prefer it when someone makes it explicitly known that they're stating their opinion instead of trying to pass it off as fact (unless they use 'opinion' as an excuse for why they shouldn't have to discuss why
Big Rigs is a bad game). If you've only ever played big budget, highly reviewed AAA games, then I don't doubt that
Half-Life might be the worst game you've ever played. If you were never a fan of RPGs but someone convinced you to try out
Dragon Age, I would be surprised if you
did like it. But technically speaking, they're not
bad games. Likewise, if you've only ever played the indie games that get a lot of exposure and publicity, I'm not surprised if something like
Bastion or
Super Meat Boy would be the worst one you've played. But it still doesn't make them
bad games.