Some of them look cool, some of them look awesome, some of them look like clones of the old ones, some of them look adorable, some of them look absolutely retarded.
In other words, this is just like every other generation of Pokemon. Which is what I was expecting. However, looking through that list I noticed that none of them appear to be prevolutions or evolutions of old Pokemon. If that is actually true, then this generation is automatically awesome since it isn't fucking up old pokemon.
And are also of those type listings correct, or just guesses? Because the fire starter becoming a fire/fighter again is just sad.
EDIT: I just noticed that a lot of the new Pokemon have the type bug/steel. Forretress is a pretty cool Pokemon, but they didn't have to reuse his type to make bug Pokemon good. Though I suppose this is better than a bunch of bug/flying.
Bug types are always shoved into the corner.
In other words, this is just like every other generation of Pokemon. Which is what I was expecting. However, looking through that list I noticed that none of them appear to be prevolutions or evolutions of old Pokemon. If that is actually true, then this generation is automatically awesome since it isn't fucking up old pokemon.
I can see what you mean, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was intentional.Xpwn3ntial said:Am I the only one who thinks #635 looks like King Gidorah?
And are also of those type listings correct, or just guesses? Because the fire starter becoming a fire/fighter again is just sad.
Aren't those names still in Japanese?yundex said:Edit: Don't even get me started on the names -_-
EDIT: I just noticed that a lot of the new Pokemon have the type bug/steel. Forretress is a pretty cool Pokemon, but they didn't have to reuse his type to make bug Pokemon good. Though I suppose this is better than a bunch of bug/flying.
Bug types are always shoved into the corner.