Things in entertainment you'd like to see stop

Fallow

NSFB
Oct 29, 2014
423
0
0
Every 'genius' being 25 years old. No buddy, that's not how the world works. There's a reason that all the experts, veterans, Nobel laureates, and Turing laureates are old and experienced.

Every super-programmer of late being 25, female, chatty/hypersocial, and dressed up like a retard/alternative combo. I have met over 3,000 programmers and not a single one of them matched anything even close to that profile. The awesome programmers are old, experienced, and calm, rational people.

Hacking being a realtime thing where popups keep flashing on the screen:

This is the dumbest shit ever. Who seriously believes this?


Selling fidgety and loud wrapper candy at the cinema. Dude, you are the ones that want us to pay for the cinema, why not try to make the experience worthwhile?


Stupidity driving the plot. When your story requires retards to poke things no sane human being would ever poke (Falling Skies f.i.) I completely lose interest.

Children. Children piss me off. Not in the sense that they are inherently bad, but rather that children are either the snarky superior types (like the irritating kids in Blackish), or the super-childish types (like the Middle) where certain traits are over-exposed. Both are irritating.

Hero-driving. You know what I mean. The hero will never lose, never die, and never fail. Likewise, the archvillain won't lose until the end, in a grande finale with a spectacular death scene. Redshirts abound and die in numbers comparable to multiple extinction events. The annoying stuff can be seen in shows like The Last Ship where you know that the caption can happily headshot a thousand redshirts, but when he starts firing at the archvillain in episode 2 you know he's gonna miss with even a thousand bullets at point blank.

Scenic combat. When that big explosion occurs in the background, everyone takes 5 minutes to stare meaningfully and maybe shout a bit before resuming. Most prevalent in japanese stuff, this is super annoying. When you have the bad guy in your sights, why take a minute off to ponder? Don't go for the monologue, you goddamn well know that he's going to throw sand in your eyes and get away at the end unless you act now! Yet it happens so often (also in The Last Ship) and it makes no sense, especially not in professional situations (involving SWAT, elite military forces etc that have been trained in fast and effective actions).

EVERY ************ except the distant big boss is 25 years old and superhot. What is up with this? If I want porn, I can find that. I watch series (unless they're porn series) for story and immersion. Do you think that 25 year old supermodels saving the world is immersive? It isn't! I want believable people in my shows, where the scientists aren't 25 (who the fuck has completed their post-doc at 25?!) with long glistening hair saying shit like "This test concluded that the chlorine came from a factory in Frankfurt Germany some 2 years ago and was made by a left-handed hispanic, probably named Rosalita, or maybe Rosahija".

Zoom! When you zoom in on a digital image, the resolution does not increase! It gets blocky as fuck! No camera in the world can record with such resolution as to catch the reflection in a persons eye at 10m.

Phew, that was quite the rant there.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,982
118
Full Metal Bolshevik said:
Happyninja42 said:
Full Metal Bolshevik said:
Happyninja42 said:
snip
I would disagree about Ex Machina, considering at the end of it, the AI is clearly unconcerned with humanity, and was more than happy to kill her creator, and leave the human that helped her escape to die. That pretty much falls right into my gripe with AI stories. They always turn on humanity. It turned into a "OMG the evil, egomaniac robot rapist was RIGHT to keep them locked up! Because they don't care about humanity!! Oh the tragic irony!"

Haven't seen Eve no Jikan, so can't comment on that.
dude.she was abused and had no freedom. How can you know she killed her creator because she had no regards for humans or because of what he did? Wouldnt most humans do the same to save themswlves?
Oh I have no issue with what she and the other AI did to escape their captor. My issue is she then turns around and lets the one human that did help her, and showed her genuine kindness, die. It didn't phase her at all. That is the point where the movie went right back into the "Artifical Intelligence is dangerous!" schtick which I can't stand. I get it from the idea that if he was alive he could reveal her secret, and all she wanted to do was disappear and live a life, but the bottom line is that she did it at the cost of her savior. In other movies, where a character does this, killing the person that saves them, without any hesitation or remorse, they are labeled as the villain pretty clearly. In fact, that action is frequently used to explain to the audience that this person is indeed an antagonist. So again, it loops right back around to the "AI BAD" trope. Now, don't misunderstand my critique here. I REALLY enjoyed that movie...up until the end. That's when I felt it left behind it's unique perspective, and fell back into the typical movie design of having robots be bad.

Aeshi said:
I've never really liked how the "insane" guys cryptic ramblings are practically always 100% accurate (if hard to understand) clues as to the plot/twist/whatever as opposed to, you know, the deluded ramblings of a madman.
Oh yes, this one, especially since it almost always is accompanied by the "Doubting Skeptic", who is always wrong, and usually dies horribly for his doubting of the supernatural/strange. This one really pisses me off personally. I think my favorite example of this horrible trope was from Prometheus, when they land on the planet, and go out, and one guy decides to just take off his fucking helmet! Then one crewmate goes "Don't do that!! You don't know what's in the air!" to which the response is "Oh don't be such a skeptic" ....um NO, you fucking dumbass!! That is a legitimate concern when stepping onto an alien planet for the first time!! You are a fucking scientist!! You should know better! But noooo, just shut up and don't be a skeptic.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
18,678
3,588
118
Oh, bad muzzle or trigger discipline always annoys me. One fingertip being on the other side of the trigger guard, an inch difference, is all it'd take to get it right. Not like the plot required people having fingers on the trigger all the time.
 

Rastrelly

%PCName
Mar 19, 2011
602
0
21
Putting 'character development' wherever it's necessary or not. When half a (potentially decent) detective story filled with romances/internal turmoils/kids and families/whatever else instead of SOLVING A FAWKING CRIME I want to RIP AND TEAR!!!11111
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
The big reveal being, "*GASP* It's a woman!!?" The motorcyclist pulling the helmet off to reveal long hair and such. It's WAY too overdone and assumes sexism on the audience's part.

Also, the big reveal being, "*GASP* They're gay together!!?" So what? It's 2015, they can even marry now. Gay people aren't unicorns or magic. They are relatively commonplace to a reveal that a dude loves another dude also assumes naivety in the audience and has been done so frequently recently as to have been made boring.

It just feels like these are being made for grandparents and maybe our parents rather than the supposedly all important 17-40 age group.
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
Fallow said:
Le snip about The Last Ship
Out of curiosity, is the show any good? I haven't really heard anyone talk about it, and it looked not particularly good from the ads I've seen, coupled with the show being a poster-child for "in-name-only adaptations".
Zoom! When you zoom in on a digital image, the resolution does not increase! It gets blocky as fuck! No camera in the world can record with such resolution as to catch the reflection in a persons eye at 10m.
That's not entirely true, there is 1 exception, though in fairness it's never used in fiction.

Modern military vessels have cameras on them which, at several hundred meters distance, can zoom in on the image taken of another ship close enough to read the small print on the fire extinguishers on the exterior of the other vessel (in case you're wondering, yes, that exact situation happened, and it was fucking cool).
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,982
118
Lightknight said:
The big reveal being, "*GASP* It's a woman!!?" The motorcyclist pulling the helmet off to reveal long hair and such. It's WAY too overdone and assumes sexism on the audience's part.

Also, the big reveal being, "*GASP* They're gay together!!?" So what? It's 2015, they can even marry now. Gay people aren't unicorns or magic. They are relatively commonplace to a reveal that a dude loves another dude also assumes naivety in the audience and has been done so frequently recently as to have been made boring.

It just feels like these are being made for grandparents and maybe our parents rather than the supposedly all important 17-40 age group.
The "it's a girl!?" trope I think can be blamed on lazy writing. That it's easier to establish a woman as being unique and badass, by first displaying her classicaly "masculine" skills, and then having the big reveal. Sort of like visual short hand. "Whoa! That dude's a badass! WHOA, that badass dude's actually a chick!! And since we've already established she's badass, we have to accept her badassness now without further development!" *using Keanue Reeves voice from Bill & Ted while saying that*

I agree however, that it's annoying. I never really saw the problem with accepting that women can be badasses, so never felt there was any need to point it out specifically. I blame early exposure to some good female characters in movies and books, and it sort of set the template in my head from that point on.

capcha: I like humans. Well yes I do, very astute capcha, how did you know I was a Humanist?
 

rcs619

New member
Mar 26, 2011
627
0
0
Bikini/"Sexy" armor.

I know I can't be the only person here that thinks a badass woman suited up in a practical manner for battle is way more attractive than some poor lady forced to dress up like a bad Halloween costume for the sake of "sexy". I mean, look at Quiet's main costume. She doesn't come off as sexy, she just winds up looking desperate and sad.

That alternate costume she gets where she's in the XOF uniform is really good though. More of that, less of the other :D
 

SquidVicious

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2011
428
1
23
Country
United States
This is more for TV shows than movies but I always hate it when someone lives in a really nice apartment in the city while working a service industry job. I think Community is one of the only network TV shows to do apartment living vaguely believable.
 
Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
-The strong, bad ass woman character is a lesbian.

Lesbians are great. That's not the issue. The issue is still that people who are strong still want women. You want to be subversive? you want to blow people's minds? Have a strong woman who kicks ass on the regular, who has legions of hardened rebels following her every word... who likes to be submissive to a dude in the bedroom.

How many of you can't even wrap your head around that?

-A group of heroes... but screw you if you don't like the one we want to focus on.

I hate Wolverine. I love Colossus. Ask me how happy I was with the movies.

-The only people who are 'relate-able' or 'real' are assholes.

I don't need to go into this. That's all media is nowadays.

-Trailers ending with a Monster Screaming or Someone hitting the screen.

It's so... so stupid. I don't... what is this supposed to show? Are we supposed to be scared? Are we supposed to think the character is a bad ass because he punched where we're supposed to be? It's not thrilling.
 

Cycloptomese

New member
Jun 4, 2015
313
0
0
I've got two.

Number one is shaky-cam. When I watch an action movie, I want to see wide shots of explosions and ass-kickery. I don't want to have to decipher some confusing mess.

Number two is when a show is based around the sexual tension of a couple of main characters and then two or three seasons in, they get together. This never used to bother me until I realized that I always lose interest in the show at that point. I might make it another episode or two. I've got a couple of examples, but I don't know how to use the spoiler function and I'm just not going to spoil the shows for anyone who hasn't seen them.
 

rcs619

New member
Mar 26, 2011
627
0
0
ObsidianJones said:
-The strong, bad ass woman character is a lesbian.

Lesbians are great. That's not the issue. The issue is still that people who are strong still want women. You want to be subversive? you want to blow people's minds? Have a strong woman who kicks ass on the regular, who has legions of hardened rebels following her every word... who likes to be submissive to a dude in the bedroom.

How many of you can't even wrap your head around that?

-A group of heroes... but screw you if you don't like the one we want to focus on.

I hate Wolverine. I love Colossus. Ask me how happy I was with the movies.

-The only people who are 'relate-able' or 'real' are assholes.

I don't need to go into this. That's all media is nowadays.

-Trailers ending with a Monster Screaming or Someone hitting the screen.

It's so... so stupid. I don't... what is this supposed to show? Are we supposed to be scared? Are we supposed to think the character is a bad ass because he punched where we're supposed to be? It's not thrilling.
Oh man, that actually reminds me of a fun character from a book series I like.

Thandi Palane is character in the Honorverse (the various side-stories and spin-offs from the original Honor Harrington book series). She lives in the year... I think it's like 4018 or something like that, and she's from a planet with such high gravity and such harsh conditions that humans from there are basically superhuman just to survive. Thandi is a hair over seven feet tall, and she's actually quite a bit stronger than she looks because her homeworld has like 40% higher gravity than Earth's. Physically, she's one of the most lethal characters in the series.

But yeah, she winds up falling in love with Victor Cachat (basically an elite covert operative for another nation in the series) who is described as, well, supremely average and unassuming... and it turns out that she's a total submissive in bed. Honestly, they're just a cute couple. Almost total opposites physically, but they're just super into each other. Watching a woman that could rip off a car door with her bare hands being gentle, or even goofy, with her significant other is cute as heck.

Honestly the Honor Harrington series is just chock-full of amazingly capable female characters, for that matter.
 

Recusant

New member
Nov 4, 2014
699
0
0
A longstanding gripe of mine: I'd say that shaky-cam needs to die, but I think death may be too good for it. When I attempted to watch the new Battlestar Galactica (having thoroughly enjoyed the original), I was very surprised to see it appeared to have been filmed by epileptics during an earthquake. I had to watch it in ten-minute increments because I got too motion sick otherwise, and about an hour in I threw up anyway. When this is happening to someone who played through all three Descents with no problem- someone who, in games of Alien Vs Predator, was usually the one alien on a server full of predators and marines, it'd be a good idea to stop and ask why this is going on. I wondered why none of the camera crew ever said "Hey, why are we shooting this on roller skates in a field of marbles? Won't it be hard to watch without chugging Dramamine?", only to find out it wasn't; it was filmed normally and the crazy shaking was added in later. Utterly baffling.

Also utterly stupid. The idea is that it's "more realistic", and thus adds immersion. Do a quick experiment for me. Bind a camera to the side of your head and walk down a hallway. Then walk faster. Then walk while carrying something heavy. Then run. Now look at the footage. Notice how much your head bounces? Notice how you don't notice that, since your brain (which has had millions of years to adapt to solve just this problem) compensates so that you can actually see clearly while you run? Cameras don't do that. Bouncing the camera around doesn't add to realism; it detracts from it. It's a bigger immersion-killer than having Mike and the bots down at the bottom of the screen mocking the show/movie/game would be.

Some problems, however, are not technical, and at first glance seem to be so deeply petty they're barely worth mentioning- but if you're going to be trusted with a project that can cost tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars, you want to put the best image forward that you can. To that end, two things:
1. Trailers trail. They follow. They come after. If the movie hasn't come out yet, you cannot release a "trailer"; there's nothing to follow yet. The movie has not yet been seen; the snippet you put out is for watching prior to watching the movie. That's why we have the word "preview". That's what you mean. Use it. You do not earn confidence by saying "we don't understand how time works".
2. "Reveal" is a verb. It is not a noun. The noun is "revelation", or "revealing" in some cases. You do not earn confidence by saying "we don't understand the difference between nouns and verbs".


Fallow said:
Every 'genius' being 25 years old. No buddy, that's not how the world works. There's a reason that all the experts, veterans, Nobel laureates, and Turing laureates are old and experienced.
Actually, that's not how the world works- the whole point of being a genius is that you learn (and thus develop skills) incredibly quickly. "Genius" isn't something that you learn, it's something that you are. It's entirely reasonable to assume that a person who got the background and knowledge very quickly would be a go-to person for outside agencies- especially since a lack of work experience would likely make them relatively cheap to employ. That'd they'd be young and attractive also means they'd be a likely pick for a public face of the group/organization/what have you.

That said individual is almost always young and attractive is a different matter, of course; if that's all you meant, I have no objection.
 

Fallow

NSFB
Oct 29, 2014
423
0
0
Zontar said:
Out of curiosity, is the show any good? I haven't really heard anyone talk about it, and it looked not particularly good from the ads I've seen, coupled with the show being a poster-child for "in-name-only adaptations".
It's fair.

The basic military stuff is better than most that I've seen - with proper rifle management, correct formation movement at times, and basic tactics accurate in many places. So off the bat it's better than most shows that involve a heavy armed forces element. So it's a big plus if you like military porn. The 'smart' stuff could be smarter, and the science is pretty much as I ranted about earlier[footnote]Rhona Mitra, nuff said[/footnote]. It's pretty easy to watch though, and you're rarely in the dark about who the good guys are.
On the other hand, there's a lot of "nationalism"[footnote]I added quotes because nationalism is sometimes associated with bad things, and there's nothing evil or negative about it here[/footnote] involved. It's not as bad as '4th of July', but expect flag waving and patriotic salutes.

All in all I'd say it's great for when you come home from work and want to unwind a bit while multitasking. If you want a serious 'full focus' kind of show, I think you'll need to look elsewhere (I absolutely loved Hannibal for that).


That's not entirely true, there is 1 exception, though in fairness it's never used in fiction.

Modern military vessels have cameras on them which, at several hundred meters distance, can zoom in on the image taken of another ship close enough to read the small print on the fire extinguishers on the exterior of the other vessel (in case you're wondering, yes, that exact situation happened, and it was fucking cool).
Fair enough.
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
God, so many to choose from. Here is my top ten in no particular order (though there are far more):

1. "But the Prophecy says" as an excuse to make a protagonist do something. It's a bullshit method of motivation and a built in spoiler.
2. Having a major conflict be the result of two characters who just can't fucking spit it out an important bit of information, even when there is absolutely nothing stopping them from talking at all.
3. This back and forth:
"This ends now."
"No, it is only the beginning!"
4. This one as well:
"We are very much alike, you and I!"
The response "having a thing in common does not make us alike" is never uttered. [https://youtu.be/H2hXLawl-Zc?t=37]
5. A movie in which hordes of enemies are massacred without thought, yet we are supposed to find it tragic when the hero gets killed.
6. Romeo and Juliet plots (lovers thwarted by their corresponding faction alignments).
7. Comic book movies that always feel they have to be about stopping that big blue sky beam from destroying the world somehow. Why can't it be something small scale for once? Netflix's Dare Devil pulled it off.
8. Always casting ugly men opposite sexy women yet refusing to do the reverse.
9 That scene in which a soldier says something blatantly sexist about a main character being "just a girl", only to then get knocked out straight away by a right hook from said girl.
10. Music in modern comedies and rom-coms. They don't have interesting soundtracks ever, just recycled pop music from the 90s for a bunch of montages.
 

Tuesday Night Fever

New member
Jun 7, 2011
1,829
0
0
Kyrian007 said:
And to go even further, the proliferation of "shaky-cam" or "handycam" to inject so-called "realism" into an action movie.
I wish I could remember which movie commentary track it was I was listening to, but I remember a director mentioning that the use of "shaky cam" and extreme close-ups in movie combat scenes rarely has anything to do with "injecting realism," and that's an excuse often used within the industry when talking to the public. He admitted that the real reason many directors use "Shaky Cam" is because it actually makes fight and battle scenes significantly easier (and cheaper) to shoot. You can cover up lazy or bad fight choreography with it, you can cover up for poor acting with it (or just straight-up replace the actor with a stunt person without anyone noticing), and it makes it easier to re-shoot something if someone's mistake is visible (since you only have to re-shoot a few seconds instead of an entire sequence). It also makes it more difficult to tell when special effects in the scene, regardless of physical or CGI, are done poorly since the camera never focuses on them.

And hey, speaking of CGI...

I can't stand the over-reliance on CGI in movies these days. It almost always looks like crap, unless the filmmaker is able to throw enough money to match the GDPs of several small countries combined at a studio (and even then, the studios that do the CGI for movies often don't actually make enough of a profit from their work and immediately go under). Physical effects like those done by Stan Winston's team still look great like 30 years later (while also being comparatively dirt cheap), meanwhile CGI from 5 years ago already tends to look laughable - even when it's the particularly expensive sort. And the sad thing is that there are fewer and fewer people in the industry each year who are actually good at doing practical effects like those done by Stan Winston's team because demand is so low.

I don't mind CGI when it's used to enhance a physical effect. I think it was in the commentary track for the 1999 SciFi movie Virus that director John Bruno mentioned that they intentionally mixed practical effects and computer effects to create the movie's main villain so that viewers' eyes would have a difficult time distinguishing what part of the effect was really there and what part was CGI. The movie was, admittedly, pretty forgettable - but I've always liked that particular method of using computer generated effects. It certainly ages better than, say, the Star Wars: Episode 1: The Phantom Menace method of shooting pretty much everything in front of a green screen.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,982
118
Pluvia said:
Has anyone said the Wilhelm Scream yet? Because it's definitely the Wilhelm Scream.
See, for me, I enjoy the Wilhelm scream. It's an amusing little 4th wall moment for me personally. Whenever I hear it in a show/movie, I always shout out "Wilhelm! NOOO!", in scenery chewing fashion. It makes me chuckle, but I don't expect anyone else to enjoy it like I do. I can understand why some would want it to go away.
 

Kajin

This Title Will Be Gone Soon
Apr 13, 2008
1,016
0
0
The one biggest thing I'm sick of in entertainment has less to do with the entertainment itself as opposed to the people watching it.

I'm absolutely sick of people who ***** and moan about works being aimed at The Lowest Common Denominator. It's basically a right of passage for people to complain about the LCD whenever they see media that isn't aimed specifically at their particular niche. People really need to get over themselves and stick to enjoying the media they enjoy, rather than giving other people a hard time for consuming something they don't like personally.
 

Lightspeaker

New member
Dec 31, 2011
934
0
0
Twintix said:
Why does the female elf exist? Why did they feel the need to create her? To show the world "Look how progressive we are, there's a GIRL DOING COOL THINGS in this movie, give us all of your money, feminists!" or something?
I'm not saying its not dumb. I'm just saying that I think the whole female character thing came before the romance idea. As a prediction it went something along the lines of:
"Hey, Philippa, you know there's no female characters in this book?"
"What? That can't be right..."
"Seriously. What are we going to do?"
"Well we'll just stick one in. Can't hurt. Since we're sticking Legolas in lets just put the two in side-by-side."
"But what are we going to have her DO?"
"Um...well...she can fall in love with...ah...this random dwarf guy! That'll work! It'll be like Legolas and Gimli again!"
"BRILLIANT!"



Ouroboros said:
Fallow said:
Every 'genius' being 25 years old. No buddy, that's not how the world works. There's a reason that all the experts, veterans, Nobel laureates, and Turing laureates are old and experienced.
Maybe it's demographic pandering, maybe they're looking at the usual productive range for geniuses in STEM fields. 25 is prime time for productive genius in most cases, petering off by the mid to late 30's.
This is probably the case really. I'm 27 and just recently finished my PhD. Thus technically I'm officially the world expert in my very specific field. Because there are like...four other people globally that are at all involved in my specific field (all in my lab, one of them being my supervisor) and I know more about my specific part of it than any of they do. That's just how science works.