Lieju said:
With LOTR, though, where we are supposed to think of them as the good guys, it's different.
I'm especially bothered by the gender politics.
For example, the valar are mentioned not to really be male or female, they just take those kinds of forms.
And yet they form male/female pairs?
Wouldn't want to seem gay or anything?
And why did all the wizards take male forms? They aren't really male or female either.
And don't get me started with female representation...
I love LOTR, but I acknowledge it's issues.
That wasn't actually my main issue with Lord of the Rings. I remember that when I read it I was a little unnerved by the whole Númenorean part of the story. When you boil it down they're basically a superior race of humans, not just in a physical sense but in a spiritual, moral and intellectual sense as well. I remember the book portraying the whole race of people as essentially perfect and incorruptable as opposed to the "normal" humans who were deeply flawed, greedy and curruptable. If I recall correctly it even stated that Gondor was in decline specifically because the bloodline of the Gondor kings had been mixed with non-Númenor blood and that Aragorn being crowned king was significant not only because he was the rightful heir but because he was pure blooded.
I might have misinterpreted the whole thing (or remember it wrong), but for me the idea of a superior human race and the decline of humanity because the blood of the superior mixed with the blood of the inferior reminded me a little too much of similar real-world ideas and beliefs. I love Lord of the Rings, but never really got over that part of the story.
Ten Foot Bunny said:
The entirety of The Who's album, Quadrophenia.
Confused? Let's analyze:
* Reject your parents, authority figures, and all of society's norms
* Drive across country to instigate a fight with a rival gang that turns into a riot; enthusiastically participate in the riot
* Earn popularity and respect by taking copious amounts of drugs and engaging in innumerable sexual conquests
* Tell off your boss for making you do work; get fired
* Use sadistic power fantasies to facilitate masturbation if you can't find consensual sex
* Steal someone's prized possession - their status symbol - if they have the popularity you're struggling to achieve
* Commit suicide
---------------------------------
Okay, so the last one is only a theory, though heavily implied. Pete Townshend has never answered fans' questions as to whether or not Jimmy took his own life.
I'm actually gonna step in and defend Quadrophenia here. The actions of the main character are not necessarily the message of the album. I can't come up with another example right now, but there's plenty of movies with characters acting in a (often despicable way) way that are not encouraged by the movie itelf.
I've never found Quadrophenia to carry any real message, but rather a theme of abandonment. The need to belong somewhere but feeling that everywhere you seek shelter lets you down. To me, Jimmy's destructive behavior isn't as important to the album as his disillusionment with society's institutions. He feels let down by his famiy, by his job, by his music and ultimately even by his subculture. You can argue back and forth whether he has the right to feel that way, but I think the album is centering on the feeling itself, not on a message of whether or not it's justified.
That doesn't mean I think Townshend is criticizing the behaior of his main character. I wouldn't even argue with someone who says he's romanticising it. But I've never interpreted it as the message of the album, which is one of my favorites of all time, both musically and lyrically.