you know what would make the PSVita more appealing? backwards compatibility - i.e. some way to transfer UMD games to a PSVita. considering i have a PS3 and PS+, the Vita was slightly appealing, but knowing that i'd have to pay for digital versions of almost anything i wanted to play and that i couldn't go on the second hand market and buy UMDs kept me from even considering it. sony cares more about getting people to buy its overpriced system, with overpriced modern games with little support for older titles. i mean, if they announced the whole PSP library was coming to digital at reasonable prices, i'd be all over it, but even if they did, they'd still try to get us to pay retail.
although i have a 3DS, it was a gift from my wife, and i already had a DS with a collection of 20 or so games - so the native backwards compatibility made the 3DS way more attractive than a PSVita. even now, i only have 3 3DS games - i'm not interested in ports of older games (ok, i lie, i still want star fox 3DS... but i already played the hell out of it on my N64 back in the day), especially at $40, so i have both mario games and Final Fantasy Theathrhym, and that's it. in fact, i'm more interested in the VC titles than the new cartridge games as i can get the same play time at <25% of the cost (link's awakening, metroid 2), and i'm still playing DS games (mega man zero collection). i can still go out and buy tons of other DS games second-hand and play them on my 3DS. regardless of nintendo's missteps, they at least realize how much backwards compatibility matters to current gamers - the original DS could play GBA games, and the 3DS can play DS games, the Wii could play GC games and the Wii U can play Wii games - so even if there aren't many retail games, you could still go pick up older games while you wait, or even buy the system so you can still play those old games. you can't do that with Vita.