Thor Is Getting Gender-Flipped. Officially.

Recommended Videos

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
I'm still a bit iffy about this though having read what the writer was going for it might be ok. I still think they should change the name and I would have preferred they were promoting a completely different character with there own powers in his place to begin with. They don't know who she is so could just refer to her as Goddess of Thunder or something. Yes it stupid when other characters take his name as well but I guess this is silly point to get stuck up on. It sounds like Thor is not getting ditched. He just doesn't have his hammer. I doubt it will stick though, maybe they will give her a knock of hammer not straight up kill her when they decide to give Thor his hammer back.

Grimbold said:
It is quite disrespectful, treating a god like this. Gender swapping was seen as very shameful in Norse society.
It is like if some Japanese made a manga about Lady Jesus.
I'm pretty sure anyone who is legitimately worshipping the Norse gods and isn't a teen trying out more obscure religions cause it cool would already find Thor disrespectful. It's not like it's been faithful (or as faithful as you can get with stuff like this) religious studies up till this point.
 

chinangel

New member
Sep 25, 2009
1,680
0
0
so by now everyone knows that Thor in the comics is turning into a girl. What's hilarious though is the resulting nerd rage from it.

The most common shriek is that "THOR IN THE VIKING STORIES WAS A GUY!"

really? You're pulling the historical accuracy card now? After Thor was a girl...twice in previous comics, was not actually a god in the Marvel comics...had an ice-giant adopted brother...could fly (sort of)...fought aliens from other dimensions...tangled with The Hulk...and Captain America...and Iron Man...was a greenpeace freedom fighter (it happened) and whos power was considered worthy of being given to an alien with the face of a horse AND A GODDAMN FROG at one point.

AND NOW you're calling bullshit?

Come on...if you're upset about it at least say the real reason: thor is a girl and now I can't relate to her. And possibly, 'thor is now a chick and is not dressed like a slut'.

I get people are angry about this, I just wish they wouldn't use strawman arguments.

I, for one, think the idea is...stupid. But not for the reasons given. I think it's stupid because Thor is *NOT* being turned into a girl but rather HIS power is being given to a new girl, along with the name and title.

And this is a failing. Why? Because NOBODY in the Marvel universe, the Villains especially, will have any reason to care. They have NO connection to this person and just because they're named 'Thor' doesn't mean they're Thor.

it would've been better to actually turn Thor into a chick, because that way, the villains would have a reason to stick around and have their connection to the genderswapped hero, it would make Thor really question his identity and give him a lot of personal reflection and give the public some insight into what it's like to be transgendered: to look int he mirror and know what's looking back isn't right.

Not to mention Thor's relationship with his family, friends and his girlfriend would all change. It would all really make for more interesting reading than 'Thor with boobs'.

Just my two cents, but that's how I see it.
 

Madkipz

New member
Apr 25, 2009
284
0
0
Grimbold said:
It is quite disrespectful, treating a god like this. Gender swapping was seen as very shameful in Norse society.
It is like if some Japanese made a manga about Lady Jesus.
Loki did some gender swapping to the point of actually birthing sleipnir.

This is likely no different.

Also. Just to mention it. The real Thor is an asshole.
 

votemarvel

Elite Member
Legacy
Nov 29, 2009
1,353
3
43
Country
England
Harrowdown said:
Thor doesn't have an alter ego, so the name is synonymous with the title of 'God of Thunder'. When Eric Masterson briefly took up the role, he went by Thor. I don't really get why you're quite this indignant. It's not the end of the world, man.

Personally, I think this is a positive move. It's long been established in the canon that Thor's powers derive from the hammer Mjolnir, not from Thor himself. "Whosoever holds this hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor." Despite the gender-biased use of pronouns in that quote, the point is that the powers, and by extension the role of Thor, can be held by anyone worthy. Indeed, multiple characters throughout the comic's history have wielded Mjolnir, including some women. So although Thor himself is unchanging, his hammer and powers(and by extension his role as the God of Thunder, e.g. Eric Masterson) aren't tied exclusively to him. Ergo, this is not strapping boobs onto a male character. Rather, it's passing on a traditionally masculine role(not male, MASCULINE. There is a difference) to a female character who has proven herself worthy of the role. There's a lot of opportunity here to experiment with the concepts of gender roles and gender identity, and the fact that Thor is such a high profile character makes this a very strong statement of intent from Marvel, in relation to their attitude towards diversity in their comics. Besides, it's almost certainly a temporary move. Chances are good that Thor will get his hammer and title back, and the female Thor will get a title of her own.

Either that, or she'll end up in a fridge. Marvel has a shaky history with female characters, after all.


EDIT: Sorry, accidentally posted a duplicate.
When Eric Masterson was Thor, most people didn't know it wasn't the same person, he also took on the physical appearance of Thor.

Indeed he continued to look like Thor when he became Thunderstrike. He then changed his 'costume' to avoid any confusion.

Thor's powers at Marvel are his own, he's quite capable of calling lightening and storms without the hammer. Jason Aaron's own stories confirm this.

Mjolnir has a powerset of its own, as well as letting the worthy duplicate Thor's. The hammer creates passages through space and into other dimensions for example.
 

dystopiaINC

New member
Aug 13, 2010
498
0
0
ultreos2 said:
So if the first Thor movie is any evidence it is kind of implied that Thor may be a title and not necessarily just a name.

"Whoever wields this hammer shall wield the power of Thor." Or something along those lines, as opposed to God of Thunder.

While within the themes of the storylines, I suppose I find it more odd they can't make a new character through some different means that perhaps opposes Thors power with a similar power set as God/ess of Thunder and make for an interesting battle between the two, something kind of normal for Asguardians, as opposed to him just losing his worthiness, but it has some intrigue to it at least.

Still it seems like she is still a new character all around.
Really? if we are going by the movies example I would say it does the opposite. In the movie Thor was Thor with out the hammer until Odin punished him. Until he launched his attack on the ice giants Thor didn't have the hammer he took it from the vault for his assault. As punishment for his poor choices Odin bound his power into the hammer. making him for all intents and purposes Human with out the hammer. but up until then he was still a powerful Asguardian on his own, made more awesome by his big magics hammer.
 

conmag9

New member
Aug 4, 2008
569
0
0
I'm not much of a comic book fan, so take my opinion on the matter either with a grain of salt or that of a viewer from the outside, whichever best suits you.

This isn't really what I'd call progressive. To me, it reeks of publicity stunt. The whole action looks like something designed to appear diverse while missing the point of diversity. Changing character designs to match public mood, rather than for in-character reasons sits poorly with me (a bit of a hang up I have from all my rp-ing: never let OOC influence IC). I get the goal, and I whole-heartedly support the idea of more diversity with characters (mostly for other people's sake. In games and such, I don't really care about gender one way or another, just the character's actions and attitude. I get that others care more though, and that's fine).

This isn't the way to go about it though. Make NEW characters. Experiment with fresh designs and see what sticks, then build from there. You can work from a blank slate that way, not stepping on the toes of established creations (you know the old saying, if you want to make enemies, try and change something?). Just making "x character, but female" sorta feels insulting to me. And with fresh characters, you also avoid lots of secondary pitfalls like the immense web of legal craziness that comics sometimes have to deal with. End result: more fleshed out worlds, more character designs, more for everyone.
 

renegade7

New member
Feb 9, 2011
2,046
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
This is a bit weird, because Thor is his name, right?
Actually it was a gender neutral name. A lot of women took his name in addition to men to protest the Christianization of the Norse culture. Thor also had an important feminine aspect, as he was also the god of healing and fertility.
 

Maxtro

New member
Feb 13, 2011
940
0
0
Just a guess, is the current Marvel guy Thor, the original Thor?

What if Thor was named after the god Thor and received his power?

The inscription on Mjolnir says "Whosoever holds this hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor." So I'm thinking that there was an original God named Thor, that the current Thor was named after. I really can't imagine the name on the inscription changing with whoever is worthy of the hammer. For example, I can't see the inscription saying ""Whosoever holds this hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of John."

So basically Thor is the dudes name and his title. For example, what if one of the Robins in DC was actually named Robin.

With that in mind, it's possible to have somebody else have the power of Thor and be called Thor.
 

Drake the Dragonheart

The All-American Dragon.
Aug 14, 2008
4,606
0
0
Thor be a lady tonight?

So will Thor in Avengers 2 or Thor 3 be the new female Thor?

That picture of frog Thor is both hilarious and awesome at the same time.

Also, I have wondered about something. "Whoever wields this hammer, if he proves worthy, shall possess the power of Thor." So what if in the first Thor some random guy who was worthy happened to come by lift the hammer?
 

petercacic

New member
Jul 22, 2014
6
0
0
This is not She-Thor. This is not Lady Thor. This is not Thorita," Aaron said in the press statement. "This is Thor. This is the Thor of the Marvel Universe-- no this is a travesty to all fans of thor , this is so lame .