Too Human Developer Given $4 Million Grant
- Thread starter Greg Tito
- Start date
Right. If its a Too Human sequel, they need to take these things on board:
-Map camera control to the right analog stick and then leave it the fuck alone.
-Make combat flow a bit more smoothly. And let us use the actual buttons to pull off attacks and combos. The combat in the first one flowed like a river of bricks to quote Mr Croshaw.
-More frequent, varied and longer areas. There were four or five really short boring zones in the first.
Apart from that, I loved the game. The premise seemed really interesting and the aesthetics were lovely.
-Map camera control to the right analog stick and then leave it the fuck alone.
-Make combat flow a bit more smoothly. And let us use the actual buttons to pull off attacks and combos. The combat in the first one flowed like a river of bricks to quote Mr Croshaw.
-More frequent, varied and longer areas. There were four or five really short boring zones in the first.
Apart from that, I loved the game. The premise seemed really interesting and the aesthetics were lovely.
If i may comment, if there going to give any game a grant for art, why not revive Clover and give it to Okami, or maybe Shadow of the Colossus developer Team Ico?Greg Tito said:
Thank you. I would actually be psyched to see them do a similar project to the Twin snakes but for Sons of Liberty. If updated right it would certainly be a good way to spend 4 mil.Brad Shepard said:
Please be making Too Human 2. While Too Human felt rushed and unpolished it was still quite a good game imho.
This posts proves that people do not understand the meaning of words while communicating with each other- hence all the communication ever between all the people on planet Earth is pointless.H0ncho said:
Flawed reasoning. I thought it was clear.
Invoking particular cases of mismanagement or bad decisions and trying to shoot down the whole concept is flawed.
I repeat- everything can be denied with that argument because calling up on perfect results as only acceptable ones, is also a flaw in reasoning.
Let's see.
There is a lot of bad games.
Bad games are a waste of money.
Because there are so many bad games, all games are, in general, a waste of money.
That conclusion doesn't say anything about a concrete game- is it worth or not it just claims that because some games suck - must be that all games suck.
We can agree that first two statements are true but the transition from "a lot" to "all" is the problem. That is the flaw with that conclusion which is useless.
I'm not alone.
I bought it for $5 off eBay the other day. It's great fun, and the cybernetic Mythology idea is quite interesting also. I'm not very far into the game, but my one gripe is that every sword attack launches them in the air. A little annoying, but I have played far worse games. FarCry 2 anyone?D_987 said:
Are you... serious? No way.D_987 said:
I beat my head against that game from start to finish, utterly disgusted by it in every way possible. I think you may be the only person I've ever heard say they liked that game (Plus two, after double checking the topic).
As for Eternal Darkness 2... I'd love it, but it wont happen.
It's horrible. I played it for about twenty minutes and I wanted to jump off a building. The Camera doesn't cooperate with you, the fighting controls are really strange and akward, (You attack with one of the control sticks if I remember correctly) and of course the drawn-out death scenes grind away at your sanity.ForgottenPr0digy said:
Where's capitalism when you need it amirite? I thought Silicon Knights had gone out of business a long time ago, and it's shame that the Canadian government is wasting money that could've gone to a smaller developer to help them get into the mainstream. Maybe Silicon Knights is too big to fail.cuddly_tomato said:
