Top ten greatest weapons in history

Another

New member
Mar 19, 2008
416
0
0
Naheal said:
Another said:
Naheal said:
Two things:

1: The halberd was less than useful unless you were fighting someone on horseback. A longspear would do a better job.

2: Compared to the katana, a bastard sword, a zweihander, and a claymore would perform better for blade-to-blade combat.
Agreed.

Pikes(so, yeah a long spear) used by a group of men in a square formation was what really ended the dominance of armored knights. And it makes me sad that the pike isn't at least in the top five. It ended a whole era.

As for the katana. It's a sword like any other, but designed to be used under certain conditions, these conditions being dictated by the style of fighting for its location and culture. The katana was great for fighting against other armed men in its own location and era, but it was never designed to fight armored opponents. No sword was really, they were meant to take out infantry, that's why knights had lances and hammers to take out other knights. But, if you look at designs of swords from the mediveal time period you can see they change form to be more pointed as time goes by. So in tl;dr: A sword is a sword, the person using it is what matters.
However, the reason why a zweihander, claymore, and bastard sword function better than a katana against an armored opponent is one single thing: weight. While a single katana may be sharp, the sharpness of the blade itself made little difference against most mail armor. A fully armored knight getting hit with a zweihander is going to feel that hit. Bones are going to break. He'll eventually die from the trauma. The katana, on the other hand, is almost useless against an armored knight specifically because of it's size.
Point taken, I retract my "not designed to" statement with regards to swords of that type. Still putting money on the knight with the hammer though :p
 

SkellgrimOrDave

New member
Nov 18, 2009
150
0
0
Bear in mind every single one of these pretty much is an antiquated weapon, so no guns here.

10) Gladius.
Mass produced steel cutter and stabber, beautifully simple design for killing. Very Roman.

9. Stilletto.
A deadly thin metal spike designed to stab quickly and nothing else. Not a combat blade, but so elegantly and deadly simple. Stab Stab Stab.

8) Shield.
Yes, the shield is a weapon. Shields made Spartan phalanxes and Viking shield walls, but low on the list because onces armour becomes enough protection from most weaponary, the shield is mostly downplayed to parrying only.

7) Quaterstaff.
Thick oak quaterstaff, not the bend of the wax wood staves, but can take sword cuts, hook axes and break limbs, and easily available and easy to train with.

6) Morning star.
It's a lump of spiky metal on a stick whaling around and making contact with skulls, legs, shields, and breaking most of them. It's just a brilliantly simple and brutal weapons.

5) Katana.
Before you fanboys mouth off about how it's so low on this list, there's good reason for it. You can't block with half the blade. The cutting edge of every european sword has to be both for cutting and blocking, the Katana blade has a hard and sharp but very brittle cutting edge. With technique and training this can be accomodated, but as an inherent weapon it's an incredible disadvantage.

4) Spear.
Used by every warrior since the dawn of time, still used in the form of the bayonet. From the Spartan oak and bronze heavy spear to the sarissa of macedonian phalanxes to ash hafted viking spears to 18ft pikes, spears have always been on the battlefied, and for good reason. Pointy stick useful.

3) Longbow.
Training requried - Huge
Output of training - the most deadly ranged army until firearms were readily and accurately available, longbows of about 180lbs draw weight can send arrows far further, faster and more accurately than even most 18th century firearms, it's just the training that meant it was easier to mass equip 500 peasant two months before battle with guns that a lifetime of training for longbowment.

2) Longsword.
Medieval style longsword, designed to be razor sharp and yet heavy enough to provide percussion cuts, can be wielded very effectively one handed or two, and suited to both cutting and thrusting.

1) The Dane Axe.
It's a giant 6ft axe designed to cut through anything, wielded by someone with enough strength to use it effectively, it goes through any armour or horse or shield of the Dark age period. Does exactly what it wants to do perfectly well.
 

toastmaster2k8

New member
Jul 21, 2008
451
0
0
Atleast the 1911 was in the list. Imo It should of been #6 cause it has done something right for it to be in service for almost a 100 years!
 

EvanJO

New member
Nov 8, 2010
93
0
0
Pre-industrial weapons may have changed the way wars were fought, but modern military technology has flat out ended the concept of all-out warfare. Aircraft carriers, cruise missiles, and the threat of being wiped off the face of the earth by an Ohio SSGN lurking silently off your shores have basically made waging war too damn risky if its against any of the NATO nations.
 

Apocalypse Tank

New member
Aug 31, 2008
549
0
0
You can't disprove the list because the idea of 'greatest' means different things to different people. I am going to assume the author takes into account the magnitude, fame and impact on history and world cultures when he evaluates a weapon.

With that in mind, here are some things that should have been done:
1) Crossbow and Bow should be one entry, or neglect crossbow as #10.
2) Hydrogen/Nuclear bombs should be on this list, particularly of the ICBM kind.
3) Halberds should not be on this list. It is a distinguishably Western, impractical weapon that have little practicality in comparison to the spear or other contemporary weapons.
4) MP5, the famed weapon of special forces and a symbol of counter-terrorism, is not included.
5) Including the Russian tank T-34, which influenced tank manufacturing in much the same way as the AK-47 to assault rifles.
 

Starke

New member
Mar 6, 2008
3,877
0
0
Apocalypse Tank said:
1) Crossbow and Bow should be one entry, or neglect crossbow as #10.
Honestly splitting these does make sense. The bow introduced ranged warfare, but it was the crossbow that let soldiers fire accurately without years of training.
Apocalypse Tank said:
4) MP5, the famed weapon of special forces and a symbol of counter-terrorism, is not included.
Coming from what people with actual experience have told me, for the record: people who are not me, in actual combat the MP5's reputation far outshines the weapon's actual utility.
 

Lerxst

New member
Mar 30, 2008
269
0
0
#1 - Words. A skilled speaker can do far more lasting damage with them than a skilled soldier can with a gun.