I have never played any total war games but I felt a connection to my orcs and humans in warcraft 1, I felt sad when they died and felt proud of them when we defeated the opponent with our overwhelming numbers.
Rome: Total War was an iconic advancement for creative assembly and it introduced a lot of people to the Total War franchise. With all the progress they made in Medieval 2 and Shogun 2 (oh look, two other sequels to the same era they already covered and improved drastically), Rome 2 has the potential make that magic happen again.Zulnam said:Come on, CA, you're avoiding the subject. Get into World War 1. If there's anyone who can make it work, it's you.
I like the idea of Rome II, but we already had a Rome. You're long due to change the era. WW1 would be an awesome pick.
There's a mod of the Zulu Era for Napoleon, but like I said, I'm more interested in the Early Victorian era, from the first Opium War to the end of the Crimean.BrotherSurplice said:I'm definitely in agreement with you on the Victorian Total War part. I've wanted an RTS for the Crimean War for so long ;_;AmrasCalmacil said:Everything in this article makes me happy. Except the Rome part, not really my favourite, I personally want an Early Victorian Total War, something like 1838 to 1856.
I've cared about units in RTS games for a while though, every soldier is vital to my battleplans, I tend to try and minimise losses a lot, the destruction of one of my Armies during the Peninsular Campaign was a spectacle that actually hurt me to watch. It was absolutely spectacular though, I wrote it up to try and emulate the style of historical writing.
It's not avoiding the subject to admit that the series got less varied and more boring the further it went into the gunpowder eras. Throw trench warfare into the mix and they might as well not bother with the tactical warfare, just autocomplete all of it to save time.Zulnam said:Come on, CA, you're avoiding the subject. Get into World War 1. If there's anyone who can make it work, it's you.
I like the idea of Rome II, but we already had a Rome. You're long due to change the era. WW1 would be an awesome pick.
Could have sworn I was wearing pants when I was reading this, oh well, this just makes changing my underwear easier.JezWilkinson said:For the first time in the series, land- and sea-based combat will merge into one, allowing players to storm Roman beaches in a manner similar to the invasion of Normandy.
I don't think they are trying to make you care about a specific person within a group, rather the overall unit group itself will be more fleshed out than in other Total War games.KorLeonis said:I love the Total War games, and I will absolutely be getting this. But if you had asked me to provide a list of what Rome 2 needed, realistic facial expressions would not have been on there. Don't get me wrong, I love making up stories for my generals, even for specific unit groups that have been around for a long time, but individuals within the unit? Not a chance. Sometimes, when necessary, I will feed an army into a meat grinder if it advances the cause of my nation as a whole. I don't need the game trying to make me feel guilty that Generic Spearman #127984 isn't coming home to his wife and kids.
"Tell my wife... hello."superbatranger said:Are the soldiers gonna shout out personal things while dying? "HRARGH! Who will look after my wife and newborn!?"
That's pretty specific! You do know what you want, I'll give you that.AmrasCalmacil said:I personally want an Early Victorian Total War, something like 1838 to 1856.
Eventually, in the thick of battle, you're gonna hear a very angry centurion shout "PULLOOO!! GET BACK IN LINE!" - I'm all in favor of that.Blunderboy said:Then include these two somewhere in there.