Total War: Rome II Offers Spielberg-Level Drama

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
I have never played any total war games but I felt a connection to my orcs and humans in warcraft 1, I felt sad when they died and felt proud of them when we defeated the opponent with our overwhelming numbers.
 

Akexi

New member
May 15, 2008
144
0
0
Zulnam said:
Come on, CA, you're avoiding the subject. Get into World War 1. If there's anyone who can make it work, it's you.

I like the idea of Rome II, but we already had a Rome. You're long due to change the era. WW1 would be an awesome pick.
Rome: Total War was an iconic advancement for creative assembly and it introduced a lot of people to the Total War franchise. With all the progress they made in Medieval 2 and Shogun 2 (oh look, two other sequels to the same era they already covered and improved drastically), Rome 2 has the potential make that magic happen again.

In regards to World War 1, that would be boring as hell. I don't know anyone who wants to watch a pair of trenches filled with men dying of disease more than gunfire for weeks to months at a time until one side gets the idea of making a suicide charge at the other side. That's not a fun experience on the real time or turn based side; it's just dull. If you're talking about starting the scenario with tanks, well most the war is done already.
 

AmrasCalmacil

New member
Jul 19, 2008
2,421
0
0
BrotherSurplice said:
AmrasCalmacil said:
Everything in this article makes me happy. Except the Rome part, not really my favourite, I personally want an Early Victorian Total War, something like 1838 to 1856.

I've cared about units in RTS games for a while though, every soldier is vital to my battleplans, I tend to try and minimise losses a lot, the destruction of one of my Armies during the Peninsular Campaign was a spectacle that actually hurt me to watch. It was absolutely spectacular though, I wrote it up to try and emulate the style of historical writing.
I'm definitely in agreement with you on the Victorian Total War part. I've wanted an RTS for the Crimean War for so long ;_;
There's a mod of the Zulu Era for Napoleon, but like I said, I'm more interested in the Early Victorian era, from the first Opium War to the end of the Crimean.

Could be very interesting to see the switch from Muskets to Rifle-Muskets, which were the British's primary advantage in the Crimean War.

I'm also a sucker for the Infantry uniforms of that era, still with the Regency splendour but with some of the Victorian style seen in later uniforms.


Although as far as these games go, I'm a Cavalryman, and would love to be able to use the General creator from Shogun to create myself a leader in proper 11th Hussars regimentals.


The way I see Total War though, is that every advance they make in a game with a setting I'm not particularly interested in, i.e. Shogun or Rome, is an advance for every game I'm holding out for, like Medieval III or a Victorian:TW.
 

Gennadios

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,157
0
0
Zulnam said:
Come on, CA, you're avoiding the subject. Get into World War 1. If there's anyone who can make it work, it's you.

I like the idea of Rome II, but we already had a Rome. You're long due to change the era. WW1 would be an awesome pick.
It's not avoiding the subject to admit that the series got less varied and more boring the further it went into the gunpowder eras. Throw trench warfare into the mix and they might as well not bother with the tactical warfare, just autocomplete all of it to save time.

Rome was hands-down the best in the series with the most varied unit types: chariots, phalanxes, testudo, war elephants, circle and fire... It badly needs an update with some new tech.
 

Keepitclean

New member
Sep 16, 2009
1,564
0
0
I'm a massive fan of the Total War series so I'm interested to see how this pans out. I've cared for my units in RTS games for any game where soldiers are kept from battle to battle. I may have been keeping them alive for the 'wrong' reasons but after a while I get a Pokémon like attachment to them.

The ability to name certain battalions after a certain experience level would help build this bond.
 

Scow2

New member
Aug 3, 2009
801
0
0
I don't think facial expressions are what's going to do it... in Total War, you generally can't see the faces of your soldiers anyway, as far as I know. Besides, many people (Including myself) are incapable of reading facial expressions beyond "It's a face, and it's smiling/frowning" anyway, so it's just wasted effort for them. But I'm probably in the minority here (I don't get any Uncanny Valley effect, except from actual robots.)
 

Penguinis Weirdus

New member
Mar 16, 2012
67
0
0
Personally I'm slightly worried by this, to me this isn't what the Total War series doesn't desperately need, I'd have said the AI should be the most important aspect.
Now I understand that programming an AI would be hard its hard enough to get a program that follows one set of instructions at times but come on, Total War is about Empires and Nations not the little infantry man. I don't care about him, he probably will survive the first five minutes and then die on the end of a spear-point wielded by a passing barbarian.
I would love to see a political challenge rather than a. An enemy that never surrenders ALL THE FRIGGIN' TIME (I'm looking at you France in Medieval 2) and attempt to build an actual military challenge because it has an economy and directs it's armies with some attempt at strategy.
Those may have been in Shogun 2 but that felt waaaay too slow for me.
 

BlazeRaider

New member
Dec 25, 2009
264
0
0
JezWilkinson said:
For the first time in the series, land- and sea-based combat will merge into one, allowing players to storm Roman beaches in a manner similar to the invasion of Normandy.
Could have sworn I was wearing pants when I was reading this, oh well, this just makes changing my underwear easier.

CAPTCHA: She loves him

That's great! Good news all around it seems.
 

Stomperchomper

New member
Mar 13, 2012
54
0
0
Really looking forward to the whole amphibious invasions thing, would have helped me a lot during a campaign I played once as the Macedonians...
 

Aussie502

New member
Apr 19, 2011
111
0
0
KorLeonis said:
I love the Total War games, and I will absolutely be getting this. But if you had asked me to provide a list of what Rome 2 needed, realistic facial expressions would not have been on there. Don't get me wrong, I love making up stories for my generals, even for specific unit groups that have been around for a long time, but individuals within the unit? Not a chance. Sometimes, when necessary, I will feed an army into a meat grinder if it advances the cause of my nation as a whole. I don't need the game trying to make me feel guilty that Generic Spearman #127984 isn't coming home to his wife and kids.
I don't think they are trying to make you care about a specific person within a group, rather the overall unit group itself will be more fleshed out than in other Total War games.

When I first played Rome: Total War and played as the Julii, I grew really attached to my only Triarii unit that I was given at the start of the game. I tried to get them into combat as much as possible to gain combat experience while trying to minimise casualties as much as possible, since they couldn't be retrained. I think CA are going one step further with this as each unit group will have It's own traits, much like the generals did in Rome: Total War.

Even in Rome: Total War I grew really attached to certain generals/units who had lots of combat experience and if this new Rome game can make me feel even more emotional towards my cohorts, then that would be an amazing thing.
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
Translation: The battlefield AI is still dodgy as hell and the campaign AI will still cheat it's arse off... so here's some minor, non-gameplay related item that we can puff up enough to make a press release out of.
 

O maestre

New member
Nov 19, 2008
882
0
0
i think i am one of the few people who still plays rome total war, so for me the only bad news is that it isn't coming out till 2013.... now where did i put my time machine?
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
Are the soldiers gonna shout out personal things while dying? "HRARGH! Who will look after my wife and newborn!?"
 

0over0

New member
Dec 30, 2006
88
0
0
Seems a waste of resources and more reason to crank up the specs than anything actually useful. If they want people to not treat their soldiers as expendable, maybe they should make us write letters of condolence to the families of each soldier killed....
 

Easton Dark

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,366
0
0
superbatranger said:
Are the soldiers gonna shout out personal things while dying? "HRARGH! Who will look after my wife and newborn!?"
"Tell my wife... hello."

I would die laughing if they did something like that. I throw my support.
 

Furism

New member
Sep 10, 2009
132
0
0
AmrasCalmacil said:
I personally want an Early Victorian Total War, something like 1838 to 1856.
That's pretty specific! You do know what you want, I'll give you that. :)
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
Does that mean... no more clone armies?

I find it hard to say this after the disaster that was Empire and its arcadey brothers, but they...might... actually... be going in the right direction.

Blunderboy said:
Then include these two somewhere in there.
Eventually, in the thick of battle, you're gonna hear a very angry centurion shout "PULLOOO!! GET BACK IN LINE!" - I'm all in favor of that.