The PC...a glorious way to game. IF you have the right equipment and power in your Computer. If not, then it sucks but if you have it. Use it! and Dragon Age is perfect for it
I can't picture Batman: Arkham Asylum being workable with a mouse and keyboard. Nor Assassin's Creed. Same with pretty much any 3-D action/adventure game. I'm actually trying to picture pulling off the platforming moves in those games, but the keyboard and mouse seem so limited to me. The only buttons you could have for movement are the directional buttons, which limits mobility. And this is bias speaking, but I loathe the mouse for anything other than Shockwave games, and maybe aiming in an FPS (haven't tried it in that case, but it makes a slight bit of sense). And, yeah, it's probably great for RTS and the most menu-intensive RPGs, but those aren't my cup of tea (that, and I always feel like I have to readjust the mouse before it slides off the desk every five seconds).Byers said:I agree, but my agreement extends to just about any game. Everything's better with a mouse and keyboard. 'Cept Street Fighter and racing games. Both of which, to me, have the lasting appeal of a mayfly.
Or cars, for that matter? I wonder if that troll's ever even looked at an engine, let alone fiddled around with one, yet he probably drives a car. [sarcastic crying] Has he no respect for the history of technology or that machine? [/sarcastic crying]Lvl 64 Klutz said:Normally I wouldn't dignify a post like this with a response, but I just find it so hilarious that you claim Susan's article is "flamebait" and then move on to call the entire staff "a bunch of retards."CFace said:Knowing that this post will lead me to losing my account, in all good grace I've decided to share some truth with you Susan, no matter how painful it may be.Susan Arendt said:I couldn't possibly care less about fiddling around with a PC's innards. If you enjoy it, great, rock on with your bad self, but I simply have no interest. Never have. If you don't like consoles, fine, don't play on them, but kindly don't look down your nose at me simply because I do.
The sole reason PC gamers (and yes, WE GAME - WE DO NOT PLAY, the latter is for mouth breathers) look down upon someone who states that she never fiddled with PC innards is that such statement is like saying: "I have never changed batteries in my TV remote control." With that said, how would you like us (the avid pc gamers) to look upon you? How can we possibly respect a game journalist who has the audacity to rate games and make her living, without fully experiencing those same games?! Didn't it ever occur to you that reasons the PC gamers are so displeased with anything that deals with consoles, might ring true?
I suppose you typed your flamebait article on a computer of some sort, yet you do not care about history of technology and that same machine which allows you to be what you are.
I'm done wasting words on you, Susan. You are a sad reminder that this site only has Yahtzee and a bunch of retards. Please, stick to consoles. The keyboard might be too much for you to handle.
How much do you know about the history of indoor plumbing? I assume you use the crapper everyday like most everyone else, no?
That wasn't consoles... that was Counter-Strike. There were plenty of mouth-breather sociopaths there long before Halo was ever released. It's ok, as a PC gamer who is currently attached to his roommate's xbox for the duration of Brutal Legend (which I just beat, but am gonna replay on Brutal difficulty) I understand what you're talking about and there's nothing wrong with recognizing that some games belong on certain systems. There's also nothing wrong with not wanting to get caught up in driver updates, console tweaking and video card hoarding except that you'll never be a brilliant rocket scientist like all of us 1337 PC g4m3rz.Susan Arendt said:Console gamers take a lot of crap ... we're charged with making the gaming space a low-brow, hostile environment.
Some of us just have abnormally large nosesSusan Arendt said:I couldn't possibly care less about fiddling around with a PC's innards. If you enjoy it, great, rock on with your bad self, but I simply have no interest. Never have. If you don't like consoles, fine, don't play on them, but kindly don't look down your nose at me simply because I do.The_root_of_all_evil said:First John and now you Susan, is there something about the Escapist team that has never pulled the guts out of a machine just because?because I find playing on PC to be claustrophobic and overly complicated. I've never managed to persuade my fingers to master mouse/keyboard controls,
It just puzzles me as from my first outing on the ZX81 - way before we had fancy things like colours, graphics and sound - I was hacking at the system, trying to make it do what I wanted it to do.
Consoles, to me at least, seem so sterile that I really can't get used to them. If I've not got Firefox getting me Escapist updates, Thunderbird/Skype and Steam bringing me messages, Yedit/Ywrite poking me to write something there instead of the forums and Winamp tootling away while I play - it just doesn't seem like it's working.
And talk about confusing...two joysticks, 7 buttons, two shoulders and a tilt monitor? I used to get confused with Defender or Asteroids; what's so hard about mouselook with cursors and twin-fire?
Maybe that's the sticking point between PC and Console? PC's like to have lots of things going - but concentrating on one thing at a time, while consoles throw the entire spree into the controls?
And redefinable controls. C'mon consoles, we had that down before you lot were even in the SNES stage.
But I'm wandering, as usual, it's the PC in me.
The thing that nailed consoles to the floor, for me, was Red Alert. My PC was still working on coal fires when the PS1 version came out, and out of curiosity I took a look.
I've never laughed so much at a game before. It simply couldn't compete. Fair enough, for platform games and fighting games, consoles still rule and yes, Goldeneye still kicks in 99% of PC FPSs; BUT...I can emulate all of them.
My little rig here, which I can play anything up to Crysis on, cost me £400. (about $650)
The only thing I can't do at the moment - which I want to - is play LBP, and even the moist tones of Stephen Fry can't persuade me that far.
I don't think he's trying to rub anyone the wrong way. Everyone is just too bloody sensitive. He's saying that he doesn't see how people can think PC gaming is so hard. Mind you, Susan did bring up some good points in her article that I agree with, but I also find myself siding with the PC a little too. I love my Xbox and I love my XPS, I prefer to play some games on one and some games on others.nilcypher said:Seriously Root, look back at your posts in this thread. Essentially what you're saying is "This stuff is easy, I can't figure out why you all find it difficult."The_root_of_all_evil said:As someone who has made the choice not to get one, not through loyalty, it confuses me why there's such an animosity still.
Now tell me you can't figure out why it might rub people up the wrong way.
Reading over your replies in this thread I can say that, going by tone, you're more than a little insulting and unnecessarily aggressive yourself. I haven't the slightest idea why you're so defensive in this particular thread. Now, unless you're ready to argue why a moderator and member of staff is downright flamebaiting, you'll just have to accept that tonality is already something extremely ambiguous in real life. On the internet it's little more than conjecture and assumption.nilcypher said:You might not have said the word, but your tone conveyed the message well enough.
I've tried Arkham Asylum on both the Xbox on my own home PC and the PC version wins hands down. Even my friend who's a real console fiend seemed to me to get far clumsier movement and too much forced targeting correction on his Xbox. I think the PC will always have a higher skill ceiling than console versions of games like these, once you've got real practice with a mouse and keyboard, you can do everything so much quicker and more fluidly. I think if they were to begin matching PC gamers against console gamers in multiplayer matches (of games in general), it would prove this.SamElliot said:I can't picture Batman: Arkham Asylum being workable with a mouse and keyboard. Nor Assassin's Creed. Same with pretty much any 3-D action/adventure game. I'm actually trying to picture pulling off the platforming moves in those games, but the keyboard and mouse seem so limited to me. The only buttons you could have for movement are the directional buttons, which limits mobility. And this is bias speaking, but I loathe the mouse for anything other than Shockwave games, and maybe aiming in an FPS (haven't tried it in that case, but it makes a slight bit of sense). And, yeah, it's probably great for RTS and the most menu-intensive RPGs, but those aren't my cup of tea (that, and I always feel like I have to readjust the mouse before it slides off the desk every five seconds).Byers said:I agree, but my agreement extends to just about any game. Everything's better with a mouse and keyboard. 'Cept Street Fighter and racing games. Both of which, to me, have the lasting appeal of a mayfly.
All in all, I feel a lot more comfortable with a console controller, but they certainly have their weaknesses. And the whole "Console vs. PC" mentality seems completely silly, and anyone who seriously advocates one over the other and thumbs their nose at the "opposing" side is about the same as the kind of partisan politic hacks that keep screwing over the people they're supposed to serve so they can maintain some unjust status quo.
I wouldn't be so sure about this one. Ive seen some 360 FPS gamers who flat out rape their PC counterpart players (in terms of approximate skill levels) with the dual-analog controls. I personally find that gaming with a mouse and keyboard feels so much more natural, but theres some gamers out there who feel the same with the controllers.Byers said:I think if they were to begin matching PC gamers against console gamers in multiplayer matches (of games in general), it would prove this.