I just don't think the source material was ever as deep (and thus as worthy of "faith") as you seem to think. Nostalgia can be an anchor in that way. I grew up with Transformers, but like most people I just grew up with an awareness of them as shape-changing giant robots. Why? Because that's where they got started. As toys, not as characters.MovieBob said:MovieBob: Transformers Fanboy-Free Breakdown
Another week, another breakdown of a lackluster, nonsensical movie.
Read Full Article
This is why the major thing I support in this series is the focus on the human drama. I'm not saying the human drama is great, just that I support placing the focus there. The overwhelming majority of the Transformers-aware world wasn't invested in the robots as characters, just as figures. One movie wasn't going to be enough to get people to "fall in love" with Optimus Prime.
So, just like in all of the source material, the robots themselves are one-dimensional characters. Archetypes. Optimus Prime: selfless hero. Megatron: mustache-twiddling villain. Starscream: sniveling henchman. Newsflash: the characters were never interesting enough to carry a movie.
So, instead, you connect the audience to the human drama. And while I was certainly not sucked in on any intellectual level, it was the emotional experience I could relate to, particularly in this third movie, particularly in the character of Sam. Here's a kid that has twice been thrust into the "save the world" role, now tossed aside to be an errand boy... but unable to shake this borderline-addictive drive to be in the thick of battle. The "girl problems" were just a way of demonstrating that--where most people would say, "I have a hot girlfriend. Game over," Sam is instead saying, "But I really want to show them what a hero I can be..."
As far as all of this goes, I think you've just been so dead set against the focus on humans that you really couldn't have enjoyed any of the emotional investment in the human characters. It's kind of like how I hate Glee so much because of the music that I can't allow myself to enjoy any of the character interaction.
Now, intellectual plot problems? Totally on board. They're valid criticisms... to a point. Of course, you don't levy the same criticisms with the same fervor when they pop up in other movies, so one has to wonder if the aforementioned bias doesn't inflate them a bit. But assaulting a movie like this on the basis that there are inconsistencies in the plot is like assaulting Twinkies based on their vitamin content. What you really mean to argue is that there should be more snack options in the world for healthy eaters, but what you're saying is that Twinkies themselves should be turned into vegetable wraps.