Transformers Fanboy-Free Breakdown

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
The thing I have about the whole "Robots in disguise" thing is; was that ever the idea after film 1?
Disregarding the tv series that had the actual opening music proclaim "Transformers: Robots in disguise", the Transformers' vehicle forms normally let them travel faster than their legs and arms form. But even if they didn't, that's the whole idea of Transformers. That they can turn into vehicles.

If they couldn't then they would just be "shouty drama students with cereal boxes on their heads".

Akalabeth said:
Tarkand said:
- While Sam is running to Prime, 13 or so Decepticon land and engage the Military and there 2-3 Transformer allies... but what exactly is happening in this 30 minutes scene? We see the military yell and shoot alot and we see some of them get shot back... but are we supposed to believe that a bunch of dude with weapon that are incapable of arming their target are 'holding them at a standstill'... why didn't the decepticon walk up to them and crush them? Why are they hiding behind 'chest high wall' as if this was some kind of Gear of War remake when their enemy's firepower isn't even capable of denting them... it's not like the 4-5 Autobots gathered there could prevent all 13 Decepticon from going through and kicking the soliders around...
"Kicking the soldiers around"?
I don't know if you noticed, but in the second movie the US army kicks more decepticon ass than teh autobots do. Makes you wonder why they're even around. Earth's armies seem to be able to handle the enemy just fine
Agreed, the railgun from Transformers 2 showed us that much by taking out the biggest Decepticon it could target!
 

lastjustice

New member
Jun 29, 2004
132
0
0
While much of the Escapist seem just love hate these films and echo bob's lame remarks(no matter how baseless they are.) I refuse to. Especially since he's in my arena today hehe. For having a show called the big picture he seems to rarely see it. He should really rename it Bob's tunnel vision.

So here goes....

* What Do the Decepticons Want, Again?

Same thing we do every night pinky...try to take over the world! Oh wait wrong show.

"In the movies, exactly what the evil plan is - or the reason they're sticking around on Earth - changes multiple times, often in the same film."
Um no this is absolutely false. See below.

"In the first film, everyone shows up on Earth because they only just figured out that Megatron and the Allspark are being held here. The Allspark itself, incidentally, also changes usage a few times - from scene to scene it provides unlimited power, turns regular machines into Transformers, or kills you if you're a robot and you put it in your chest. The fact that Megatron has been held by a rogue government agency for decades is apparently a big deal."

* So when did they change the goal of the Decepticons..oh wait they didn't. As for what the Allspark can do, it was basically described as a cosmic cube of sorts. it's made of pure energy, and creates life for transformers and can recreate planets. It's description never changed as everythnig it did was covered under that.May be you lack the imagination and needed the movie to hold your hand more(So much for overthinking haha.) it be no different than Electro using his powers to create magnet despite electricity being his power. It's just another application of the same prinpical in another way. (which being pure energy it's not destroyed, it merely transformed.)

So basically the Decepticons and Autobots both wanted the cube for the entire film as all subplots lead up to that. While some of the threads were a bit pointless or convoluted (whole glasses was just a vehicle to get Sam involved but they ultimately don't do much as Sam,and bumble bee recover the Cube without them. So they'd been better off just doing what Jazz said and followed Bumble bee when he got captured.)

"But in Revenge of The Fallen, it turns out the Transformers have been here since the dawn of history. One of them mentions his ancestor being The Wheel (heh) while another has been hiding in a government museum disguised as a military jet (because no one would ever check that). Also, the Decepticons now want to blow up the sun, because they're running out of fuel needed to make baby Decepticons (huh?). This is also where we learn that only a Prime can kill The Fallen, but for some reason just about anyone can kill a Prime."
* Which turns out the first movie's plot was bigger scope than originally thought as the events of the two films were connected.(since when it is a crime for movies to do that.) Why Optimus believed Megatron wanted the Allspark, wasn't the full scope of what was going on, nor was he aware of the Fallen. (something the Primes weren't too proud of and tried not to talk about hence why his original name was stripped.) Megatron himself never once explained his plans in the first film to verify Optimus' claim to make it a contradiction.

They needed the Allspark still as that thread continued with Sam absorbing it. (which was passed into the Matrix when Sam had his near death experience.) Sam had all knowledge inside him they needed to get the star harvester working as explained by Jetfire.

While wasn't explained well, merely shown vaguely.(the comics go further with this.) The Fallen had psychic powers is why only Prime could defeat him. Megatron was controlled by him , as he was his own bot when he wasn't near him, but becomes so subservant once he went near him. Prime's are immune to the Fallen's powers, as we see when Optimus battles him. If Optimus wasn't the Fallen would just tossed him around like a ragdoll as he did the US miltary just moments earlier. Optimus mauls him because of that. It's like seeing Magneto fight hulk with out his powers. It doesn't go well.

While we're tossing movies under the bus, we get more info about the Fallen than we ever got in the 1986 film to Why the Matrix of leadership (which was a massive Retcon, since Optimus never had it before it. We see a Xray of him in Prime Problem.) kills Unicron or where either of them came from. But hey one story glossing over major details all together is ok if there's enough nostaliga covering it.

"Now, in Dark of The Moon, motivations and history change yet again. The Decepticons haven't just been here for decades, they've been actively working with human collaborators. Why wasn't "let our nearly all-powerful leader out of his ice prison" on the agenda before? We're not told. Supposedly Megatron and Sentinel Prime were both headed for Earth to arrange a clandestine surrender/team up, which sort of makes sense since all that ancient tech from Fallen is here, but that never comes up. We finally get a belated repetition of the "steal your resources" motivation - but it's a trap! The resource they want is humanity itself, a slave labor army to rebuild Cybertron"

No it wasn't. Sentinel prime and Megatron forged a pact, but Sentinel was shot down before the war ended(none of the Decepticons knew about the betrayal till it happened in the film. Starscream was completely unaware of it and is surprised when megatron explains it.) and never heard from again till they found his ship in the 60s. This plan fell thru, and megatron went with other schemes between now and then. When Optimus gained the matrix, he then had means to revisit his earlier scheme. It was a dead end till then. He likely was trying figure out a way go around Sentinel being on verge of dead till then. The movie never once says Megatron's only plan was to work with Sentinel. Besides when has Megatron ever had only one scheme? he's the Doctor Doom of the Transformers universe.

Given how much got lifted from the original series in this film I'd have say someone was paying attention to the source material.

- The plot of Ultimate Doom , where the Decepticons used a space bridge to move cybertron to earth to enslave us and gather resources is lifted wholesale.

- Megatron using Abe lincoln's momument as a throne. This was done in the episode Atlantis Arises. (and the ending of the first movie game as the Decepticons.)

- Dark Awakening, Optimus prime was brought back to life as a trap for the autobots before killing him again.(Way to pour salt in the wounds Hasbro.) In the episode Rodimus imediately tries hand over leadership back to Optimus Prime the same way Prime does to Sentinel in the film. Only difference is Sentinel rejects the matrix of leadership, while Rodimus has beat it back out of prime later.

- Megatron's master plan, The autobots are forced the earth by the humans to leave due to an act of deception. Of course it turns out to be a trick, and the autobots return in time to save the planet.

- Ironhide gets wasted simliar to how gets taken out in the 86 film. Only we see it this time. (which was a real downer for me. I love Ironhide especially his movie verse incarnation.)

I'd say there's a lot more stuff but there's alot of attention to details to the source material. Far more than the credit given. Even Revenge of the fallen, was simliar plot to change gears with the solar needle. Jetfire maintained his role of being a turncoat, the taxi service of the team, and merged with Optimus Prime as he did in the Unicron trilogy.

Ultimately you have watch these with the same level of suspession of disbelief as you did with the original series. If you overanalyze it all it just doesn't work as Why in world would Megatron held back that many troops on the moon till now. 200 some Decepticons landed in DC....why did they just chill on the moon till now?.(thats really the biggest beef I had with it all. I'd liked it better if theye explained them being space bridged from some really remote part of space as to why their lack of involvement till now.) If Soundwave and Lazerbeak have been on the Earth since the 60s...why didn't they help find the Allspark sooner? Same could be said for ROTF...why didnt Jetfire, or any of the seekers looking for the Matrix of Leadership recover the Allspark since it wasn't concealed till the hoover dam was built if they'd been here for centuries? You just have look at the stories from a self contained episode outlook as there's parts that just don't work if you don't. It still has far less continuity errors than all xmen films do heh. Continuity is a pain sometimes lol.


*Do We Know the Transformers Are Here or Not?

- Do you pay attention or not? is the better question. In the first film there was a global communication blackout for an undisclosed amount of time thanks to Frenzy. It was likely dismissed as a terrorist act along with the attack the Decepticons lead in quatar at the start of the film. Having an entire group of soldiers in a city with no means of communicating to rest of the world what happened is probably pretty easy to cover up. Money or bullets, your choice.

Not to mention people likely weren't sure what the heck they saw anyways. The transformers weren't in robot mode the entire time, and people usually start running when there's army vehicles firing on the street. With no proof, most people would dismiss what the peopel would say as crazy. People claim there's aliens all time in the real world, and no one believes them. It's not that much of a stretch to guess that would happen here.

In second movie we see the pbulic starting become aware of this situation. Mid way thru the film the Fallen reveals that there's transformers on earth to the world.They openly show themselves and people are quite aware of their prescence by the third film. It doesn't help Simmons has wrote a book about it even.(though the government has painted him as nutjob, as shown in the O reilly scene.)

As for why Sam can't talk about it. He was still sworn to to keep a lid on it. That's why they paid for his school. The government probably wants keep as much of it all under wraps as possible. It's also for Sam's own safety.

*Why Are the Robots Still "In Disguise"?

"So why do they still spend most of the film dressed up as cars? And why is it always the same cars? If you'll permit me one "check the source" digression - the original point of the disguise gimmick was that they had to take the form of vehicles they roughly resembled in size and shape."
- Because it's alot cheaper show cars than robots for the entire film. Obvious answer really. Plus they are product placement in the film then. So it's a budget issue all around.

" The films do away with this concept (now any Transformer can be pretty much any vehicle) and by Part 3 have done away with their own prohibition on fudging the question of mass, as Laserbeak is seen taking the form of computers and wall decorations less than half his size."
- Laserbeak was shown to be a special case. He was able to articulate himself far better than other transformers are. Given he flies his insides might be hollowed out a bit like a real bird's structure is. It's possible he's an orgami transformer simliar how they explained Broadside being an aircraft carrier as an alt mode. Plates, which overlap in his other modes, extend out to cover the mass. As a result, his armor is terribly thin in this mode. This series has always had issues with Scale. http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Scale

"Oh, and come to think of it, in Part 2, the Decepticons have an agent that can disguise herself (itself?) as a 100%-convincing human female. And "she" doesn't seem to be some kind of special deal - just a random underling! If they can do that, why is the car/truck/plane thing in play at all?"
-Pretenders are concept that existed since the 80s. Yes they are special breed of transformers. http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Pretenders

*Why Is Optimus Prime Basically Useless?

- No more so than G1. Prime gotten beaten down effortlessly on a few occasions. He got fragged in showdown with Megatron in the 86 film. In plenty of episodes we see humans saving his butt. Whcih is larely the point, the autobots never could won the war without our help. They re not war machines, and the Decepticons are. They kicked the autobots butts up and down the block before landing on Earth. Prime is merely the toughest of the guys who aren't soldiers.

Why are the autobots shown less over series than humans? Again obvious answer...MONEY. For same reason Ironman spends majority of the film not in his armor and the whole fight with ironmonger was a whopping 7 mins. Why scenes on Oa in green lantern were brief and not the majority of the film. Why Thor spent so much time being human and less time beign Thor. You make these assessments as if budgets are unlimited or something.

This also goes back to your batman comparsion. Having Batman in his costume is not a special effect. Movies will show things that don't consume tons of cash for every second they re on screen. They dont need army take over for batman to keep the budget down since there's far less special effects involved in his films. Every other super hero tends spend a far less amont of time in costume or being super as a direct result of budget. Transformers are no exception.

*What's the Point of All This?

*To sell stuff and tell a story. As I joked transformer is the greatest 2 hour long commerical ever. You don't think so, really because Hasbro making more money with their toylines than they ever have on top of all product placement they do. Big picture Bobby..and you're missing it.

" But it extends into the thematic realm in the way The Autobots, supposedly the main characters, are constantly eclipsed in big action scenes in favor of human soldiers. An entire subplot in the first film is dedicated to a military unit fighting Decepticons in the desert, which serves almost no purpose other than to reinforce that the U.S. Army kicks just as much Decepticon ass as Optimus Prime does."


- No you're just reading more into it than it is. The Decepticons curb stomped the armed force for the bulk of the beginning of the film. A single Decepticon trashed an entire base. Scorponok shrugged off gunfire that turns tanks into swiss cheese. (Do you have any idea how stupidly resilent he was taking A-10 rounds like that? As a member of the air force I do.)The Decepticons crippled our entire communication grid, and almost caused us to go into world war 3 prior to their attack. I think was a rather balanced take on our might as a stand alone, as it always comes down to both humans and the autobots needing each other.

Humans have always been a major part of the Transformers universe. Even the original series has plenty of human heavy episodes. They play such a major role that Megatron went back in time to kill us off before we became a threat in beast wars. it gives the autobots the homefield advantage at every turn, and we vastly outnumber the Decepticons. The only series to have no human involvement on screen was Beast wars and War for cybertron.


This isn't a direct translation of transformers, rather a what if transformers were in the real world. Honestly the human element in previous series got ignored a bit too much at certain points. Such as the battle for autobot city in the 86 film, the decepticons attack for over a day and no human involvement is shown outside of Daniel despite being on Earth and distress calls going out. An alien civil war is happening on our front lawn, of course we'd get involved. May be it swung too much in the other direction, but it's refreshing to see how it effects the world as they come into it.

It also grounds the movie a bit for typical movie goer, as prior to these films I don't think you'd gotten a major turn out of box office on a super bot heavy film, if the bomb in 86 is an indicator of anything. Plus it being live action , that means humans are involved in it by default. If you really wanted a bot heavy film you,d be better off making an animated one where costs the same to make anything appear on screen. Simliar to the TMNT reboot that was all CGI. As long as it's live action humans are going be the forefront.

And don't say well they're the title characters. Gremlins, Critters, and even ET took the back seat to humans. That's just live action films for you.


Ok I think that's enough out of me for now. I'll check back later.

"Kicking the soldiers around"?
I don't know if you noticed, but in the second movie the US army kicks more decepticon ass than teh autobots do. Makes you wonder why they're even around. Earth's armies seem to be able to handle the enemy just fine
You must have missed the following scene when the Fallen trashes our forces like toys. That is why we needed the autobots to help. or all other times the Decepticons completely tore the humans a new one. (such as the fight in Chicago didn't go so hot till autobots showed up.)

Anyway. Here's what I don't get about the plot (of the second movie in particular): why the fuck did The Fallen give a shit about harvesting our sun? I mean, I get that he believed Cybertronians to be superior beings, but there are so many more stars out there without life orbiting them. To me, it seems like the only reason he got locked away in the first place is because he was a lazy asshole. He'd rather organize an army to subvert the orders he was given than, I dunno, go look somewhere else
The Fallen was unreasonable and refuses to compromise. That's really whole downfall of the Decepticons as a whole as they try drive that point home with the scene when they revive Megatron and Kill the little ones despite there being options to fixing their boss besides that.(like the parts of all dead Decepticons near by that got dumped from the first film.) They will accomplish their goals at any costs and don't care who they want on to do it. The Fallen got tired of playing ball with the other Primes and decided they were only slowing him down. He just tried to take control of the matrix of leadership and the star harvester to remove any further speed bumps later.

If the Fallen was willing make compromises and be reasonable there never would been a war in the first place. Long as two parties are willing listen they can work through anything.
 

Tarkand

New member
Dec 15, 2009
468
0
0
Akalabeth said:
Tarkand said:
- While Sam is running to Prime, 13 or so Decepticon land and engage the Military and there 2-3 Transformer allies... but what exactly is happening in this 30 minutes scene? We see the military yell and shoot alot and we see some of them get shot back... but are we supposed to believe that a bunch of dude with weapon that are incapable of arming their target are 'holding them at a standstill'... why didn't the decepticon walk up to them and crush them? Why are they hiding behind 'chest high wall' as if this was some kind of Gear of War remake when their enemy's firepower isn't even capable of denting them... it's not like the 4-5 Autobots gathered there could prevent all 13 Decepticon from going through and kicking the soliders around...
"Kicking the soldiers around"?
I don't know if you noticed, but in the second movie the US army kicks more decepticon ass than teh autobots do. Makes you wonder why they're even around. Earth's armies seem to be able to handle the enemy just fine
That's pretty much the point tho.

Either M16 rifles (or other anti-personel weapons) can do something to a Decepticon, or it can't and you need anti-vehicle/ordinance.

If anti-personal weaponry can destroy them, than the Decepticon are simply not numerous enough to be any kind of realistic threat to humanity. The army of pretty much any nation could crush the amount of Decepticon we've seen... hell, a bunch of cops or redneck with shotguns could do it, no need to even get the army involved. This makes the movies' plots even more flimsy than they currently are.

If they cannot do much to them with anti-personal weaponry (which the films certainly seem to support), than the desert fight scene in TF2 makes no sense - you cannot 'hold your ground' when you aren't even denting the opponent. The big robots could just walk up to the US soldiers and step on them if they wanted too, as M16 bullets just bounced off them.

So which one is it? It can't be both, and either way there's non-sensical stuff in there.
 

Tarkand

New member
Dec 15, 2009
468
0
0
"Kicking the soldiers around"?
I don't know if you noticed, but in the second movie the US army kicks more decepticon ass than teh autobots do. Makes you wonder why they're even around. Earth's armies seem to be able to handle the enemy just fine

You must have missed the following scene when the Fallen trashes our forces like toys. That is why we needed the autobots to help. or all other times the Decepticons completely tore the humans a new one. (such as the fight in Chicago didn't go so hot till autobots showed up.)
Well I didn't...

But like I said - why does the Fallen wait so long to join the fight? As far as we know, he's just chilling with a brewsky on the moon while his men are being slaughtered... and he only lands once Prime is ressurected and he now has a chance to be defeated.

How freaking idiotic is he? Had he helped out the Decepticon from the get go, it would have been no contest, Prime would have never been raised and the sun would be destroyed. Than again, I suppose him being an idiot is well established with the whole 'Must eat Star with a planet that has life on it orbiting it and trigger a civil war instead of eating one of the multiple billion stars with no life on it.' thing.

Just more non-sensical stuff >_<.

And yes, I know the cartoons were full of non-sensical stuff... but they were cartoons for hyped up on sugar kids, I'm pretty sure if I watched the cartoon today, I'd find them equally stupid. That is not much of an excuse however - just because the source material is riddled with holes, doesn't mean you have to make a 200 millions dollars movies that's also filled with them.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
MovieBob said:
MovieBob: Transformers Fanboy-Free Breakdown

Another week, another breakdown of a lackluster, nonsensical movie.

Read Full Article
I just don't think the source material was ever as deep (and thus as worthy of "faith") as you seem to think. Nostalgia can be an anchor in that way. I grew up with Transformers, but like most people I just grew up with an awareness of them as shape-changing giant robots. Why? Because that's where they got started. As toys, not as characters.

This is why the major thing I support in this series is the focus on the human drama. I'm not saying the human drama is great, just that I support placing the focus there. The overwhelming majority of the Transformers-aware world wasn't invested in the robots as characters, just as figures. One movie wasn't going to be enough to get people to "fall in love" with Optimus Prime.

So, just like in all of the source material, the robots themselves are one-dimensional characters. Archetypes. Optimus Prime: selfless hero. Megatron: mustache-twiddling villain. Starscream: sniveling henchman. Newsflash: the characters were never interesting enough to carry a movie.

So, instead, you connect the audience to the human drama. And while I was certainly not sucked in on any intellectual level, it was the emotional experience I could relate to, particularly in this third movie, particularly in the character of Sam. Here's a kid that has twice been thrust into the "save the world" role, now tossed aside to be an errand boy... but unable to shake this borderline-addictive drive to be in the thick of battle. The "girl problems" were just a way of demonstrating that--where most people would say, "I have a hot girlfriend. Game over," Sam is instead saying, "But I really want to show them what a hero I can be..."

As far as all of this goes, I think you've just been so dead set against the focus on humans that you really couldn't have enjoyed any of the emotional investment in the human characters. It's kind of like how I hate Glee so much because of the music that I can't allow myself to enjoy any of the character interaction.

Now, intellectual plot problems? Totally on board. They're valid criticisms... to a point. Of course, you don't levy the same criticisms with the same fervor when they pop up in other movies, so one has to wonder if the aforementioned bias doesn't inflate them a bit. But assaulting a movie like this on the basis that there are inconsistencies in the plot is like assaulting Twinkies based on their vitamin content. What you really mean to argue is that there should be more snack options in the world for healthy eaters, but what you're saying is that Twinkies themselves should be turned into vegetable wraps.
 

lastjustice

New member
Jun 29, 2004
132
0
0
If you recall, in the first movie one of the decepticons wipes out an entirely military base single-handidly and then later on GI Joe or whoever rides a motorbike in the city and slides between that same decepticons leg and hits him with at best a grenade launcher so, man-portable weapons I'd say are effective.

They didn't know what weapons were effective against them in the beginning of the film. Why they got smashed so badly. During the flight back to the states they study Scorponok's tail and notice they're vunerable to high heat sabot rounds. That they were weak below the chest in some cases with their armor. Why Lennox was able to kill Blackout at the end of the film.

By second film NEST has tailor made weapons to kill transformers because that's what they do. We see this taken even further in the 3rd film as they develop techiques to kill them more effectively. We see them training on bumble bee in the hangar, and they them apply said training against shockwave. By this point we're pros at killing them , why Barricade and the other Con's on the street got trashed quickly by the armed forces. They knew to take out their eyes, then placed high powered explosives directly on them. Once a weakness is known humans will exploit the holy hell out of it.

That being said, I do agree that the decepticon's abilities are widely different even within the context of the same movie. Just like how that helicopter guy wiped out the whole base and then later on can't kill ONE SQUAD of guys
The humans got the jump on him. blackout was too busy getting ready to jump Optimus while he was fighting Megatron to notice them sneaking up. By time he was aware of them there was already an air strike with his name on it. I don't see what's so hard to buy about air strikes blowing away transformers with the proper weapons.

But like I said - why does the Fallen wait so long to join the fight? As far as we know, he's just chilling with a brewsky on the moon while his men are being slaughtered... and he only lands once Prime is ressurected and he now has a chance to be defeated.

How freaking idiotic is he? Had he helped out the Decepticon from the get go, it would have been no contest, Prime would have never been raised and the sun would be destroyed. Than again, I suppose him being an idiot is well established with the whole 'Must eat Star with a planet that has life on it orbiting it and trigger a civil war instead of eating one of the multiple billion stars with no life on it.' thing.
The Fallen was waiting for Sam to recover the Matrix of Leadership. He is one of those mastermind villains who doesn't get his hands dirty unless he has to. We see this in comics all time with Darkseid as he will sit back and let his troops get wasted rather than get involved till he has to. Without the matrix his plans weren't going go anywhere. So he waited till right moment to reclaim it.His troops dying was unimportant to him. The matrix wouldn't have reformed without Sam going through trials to prove his worth. The Fallen needed to wait. he seemed to have a pretty good grasp of cybertronian artifacts, so you'd just assume he was binding his time.

As for wasting the Earth. The Star harvester was here, and he was proving a point.It seemed to be the best way to give the middle finger to his brothers and the insects he was imprisoned for.(in the comics they show fallen was contained by one of the Primes. Megatron freed him much later.) Decepticons usually get caught up in petty stuff and miss the big picture all time. It's their MO heh.

Now, intellectual plot problems? Totally on board. They're valid criticisms... to a point. Of course, you don't levy the same criticisms with the same fervor when they pop up in other movies, so one has to wonder if the aforementioned bias doesn't inflate them a bit.
Yes Bob seems to not mind all the flimsy writing in the Nolan batman films. A microwave that magically vaporizes water up to 50 feet away thru layers of pavement but has no effect on humans that are made up majority of water...completely ok. The Joker gets heck beat out of him by batman, and the cops leave a sole guard as the only thing keeping him in his cell inside said cell without the joker being restrained in anyway...brilliant. The national guard manages to somehow miss 50 some barrels of explosives on a boat during a crisis where known terrorists are placing bombs ...twice. I could go on but I think I'm making my point. But hey it's completely ok suck off Nolan and bash Bay for same level of plot contrivence.
 

Stall

New member
Apr 16, 2011
950
0
0
I've always been annoyed that people hate on the Transformers movies. Not that they don't deserve it, quite the contrary, but the simple fact that people are just wasting so much energy on hating these crap summer blockbusters that no one is going to care about in 10, hell even 5, years. Everyone with tastes knows these movies are bad; everyone with tastes probably new the third one was going to be bad as soon as it was announced. You don't need to convince anyone worth convincing. Almost everyone knows why they are bad. There's no need to expend such great energy ranting and raving about these damn movies. Why bother spilling so much ink on this? Is it really worth it at the end of the day?
 

Mid-Boss

New member
Jun 16, 2011
140
0
0
ZZoMBiE13 said:
The second movie caused me physical pain. I'm so sad that the third movie even exists that I cannot verbalise my disdain.
Just plain sad.
I'm sad that it's going to make unGodly amounts of money while great movies are left out in the cold.
 

CrafterMan

New member
Aug 3, 2008
920
0
0
I liked it...

It was a great action movie!

I go and watch thrillers if I want a plot nowadays to be quite honest.

-JB
 

ProjectTrinity

New member
Apr 29, 2010
311
0
0
I think the biggest things turning me off from watching the 2nd and 3rd movies are actually the fans.

They actually want people to shut their brain off in an attempt to like the pretty explosions. Now, without using your brain, you tend to think and/or do dumber things far more frequently. Now, using that logic, do you *really* want to finish applying on why you liked Transformers 3? I know I wouldn't. Seriously, shallow plots already make me yawn, but to hear the fans defend the movie with, well, statements that don't hold water outside of the fanbase makes me think of the Twilight fanbase.

Both are rather annoying. (Not all - just the ones that go on a defender's spree.)
 

Griffolion

Elite Member
Aug 18, 2009
2,207
0
41
Moviebob is too intelligent for me. He notices things about films I'd never even give a thought.
 

beniki

New member
May 28, 2009
745
0
0
You can spend all day pointing out the flaws in these movies. You can spend an entire week just listing the plot holes, inconsistencies and even basic continuity errors in the last 30 minutes of Rise of the Fallen alone, and you don't need to be a movie guy or a fan boy to see them. Seriously, just start counting pyramids in shots.

Doesn't matter how much you point them out though, someone will always defend it with "But I liked it, why isn't my opinion as valid as yours!?"

To which the answer is, sure, your opinion is that you liked it. That's valid. Still a crappy movie though, for the above reasons.

Then you'll hear, "Whatever nerd. Why don't you go wank over Clockwork Orange or something."

To which the answer is "I'm NOT a ner-! Hey that's not a bad idea."

Proper horror show :)
 

Triaed

Not Gone Gonzo
Jan 16, 2009
454
0
0
Everyone knows you do not use a legion of hamsters to build a skyscraper.
Lemmings! What you need is lemmings! :) I think lemmings (the game type) are more like humans than hamsters
 

jabrwock

New member
Sep 5, 2007
204
0
0
by Part 3 have done away with their own prohibition on fudging the question of mass, as Laserbeak is seen taking the form of computers and wall decorations less than half his size.
To be fair, the movies never really try to touch on this rule, and in the comics/cartoon, size only sometimes related to disguise. Megatron turning into a pistol, Soundwave into a walkman, etc.

The production team did mention at one point that the Autobots were designed so that they could fold down into their disguise vehicles. I remember an awful lot of effort going into describing how closely they were working with their product placement team to make sure that all the bits that went into a GMC vehicle were included in the transformed version. But they never stated the same for the Decepticons. Most of the Decepticons just transformed into vehicles for convenience sake. Flying and so forth.

But I'm just nitpicking.
 

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,265
0
0
I see what you did with the title...Clever...

But meh, i can easily watch both the G1 cartoon and the new movies without thinking "The new movies have ruined my childhood"

Although i admit Revenge of the Fallen was bad, i only watch it because of the 2 main fighting scenes...

By the way for all of you complaining at explosions...the G1 cartoon had ALOT of explosions to.
 

DJ_DEnM

My brother answers too!
Dec 22, 2010
1,869
0
0
The one that mentions that his ancestor was the Wheel is the same one hiding in the military museum who is dormant in the same way Sentinel Prime is.

So yeah...
 

Karthak

New member
Feb 8, 2010
61
0
0
When I was little I read Transformers comics, and watched episodes from various transformers series, and I enjoyed the first and third movies (not the second, that one was baaaad). I did not turn of my brain when watching Dark of the Moon, I enjoy cerebral films like Gandhi and True Grit, and I think the third film is quite good. Sure, Rosie Huntin-whatever should never be allowed on a film set, but otherwise the characters were good, the humour was mostly good, the plot made sense, and the action was brilliant.

Ps. There was plenty of retardedness going on in the very first Transformers series:
http://io9.com/5817708/10-demented-moments-from-the-original-transformers-cartoon/gallery/
 

Kenji_03

New member
May 12, 2007
134
0
0
Thank you for this Bob, as I was honestly thinking you were just having a fan-boy rant. But now I see your dislike of Bay's transformers has more ground than just nostalgia. It has to do with your (understandable) dislike of society's modern military fetishism.