Considering that the words 'Call of Duty' are in the name, they were basically guaranteed a financial and critical success before they even had the basic plot written down.
XD sorry, I guess I took it the wrong way. ;Pbeliever258 said:Actually, when I said this is what happened, I meant what you originally said about the diving board. That filled up every thought I've had about Black Ops in a nice, tight nutshell.captaincabbage said:Yeah I kinda figured that out on my own, thanks. ;Pbeliever258 said:This is what happened, and it illustrates best what they did.captaincabbage said:Are you sure they didn't use Modern warfare as a diving board instead?
Not that BO (body odor?) is a bad game, but something about it just didn't feel as good as MW2. The whole game felt like it was tripping over its own two feet, constantly stopping to show me something or do something. It got to the point where all I wanted to do was shoot, not have the game take most of the control away from me AGAIN and tell me to plant bombs or knock over barrels.
Multiplayer? Same as MW2.
You're right tho, there was something about BlOps that just didn't work. It had a great setting, great guns, alright story and a great game engine, but it just kinda fell apart.
I can't stand the multiplayer either tho. There's just so many things wrong with ut. Don't bother reading if you don't really care, I'm just venting.
I'd also go as far to say that the multiplayer is inferior. Whilst there are many advancements to the multiplayer (many more than singleplayer), like CoD points (which also seem to be the BEST THING EVAR), there were so many places where it just fell short.
The maps weren't as interesting, save for Havana or Nuketown, and I never ended up playing any other maps because I just didn't like them.
Whilst it is excellent having CoD points and they make the game much more interesting, as well as fan and addictive, there feels like theres no real point once you've bought the guns you want and got the classes you like all sorted out, which took me all of one afternoon of my first try at online multiplayer.
The biggest let down is easily in the splitscreen department. It's more of a disappointment than anything else, considering all the cool things they did include for splitscreen.
For example, online splitscreen is possibly the greatest thing to happen to CoD, but the fact that you can't choose another profile to play as, or that you can't make a custom profile like you could for splitscreen games on MW2 just irks me and takes away all the possible fun you could have had levelling up with your friends.
Which brings me to my point on profiles. In MW2 you could have four players playing splitscreen together with their own profiles on the same game, so we all had our own persistant characters to level up and earn new guns for. Now with BlOps, they've done away with that completely, leaving us with more of an experience where player 1 plays whilst player 2 just kinda tags along, copying the killstreaks, classes and level stat of player 1.
It ruins the whole point of playing splitscreen in CoD.
On top of this mediocre game, the developers have the balls to market five maps to us at the price of $20AUD!
It all adds up to just one big fat disappointing game that's a lot worse than it could have been. It especially irks me since me and my friends are all big CoD fans who always loved getting together for a night of food, drink and playing CoD splitscreen, which was always awesome.
You're right about the multi, though. I read the whole wall, and it's all true. 2010 was kind of a crappy year for gaming, too, especially shooters.
I don't think I could have summed it up any better.MetallicaRulez0 said:If MW2 was the target they were aiming for, I'd say they failed rather spectacularly. Despite MW2's obvious balance problems, it's several magnitudes better than Black Ops.
Uuh, yeah, that's what I was implying in the first place. o_oDr. McD said:This game has WORSE forshadowing, worse plot, not really as good as it sounds multiplayer and fails to understand what the title means (you could say it's called Black Ops because it's meant to be like an espionage themed action movie, but very little of the game feels like that, Modern Warfare 2 felt more like it had espionage in it).captaincabbage said:Are you sure they didn't use Modern warfare as a diving board instead?
Then again, direction you go from a diving board is down, so maybe that is an appropriate metaphor.
Really? Seems pretty obvious; MW2 will sell millions even with all the problems at IW.Logan Westbrook said:Of course, how much of that is actually down to Treyarch's hard work, and how is down to the power of the Call of Duty brand, is a point that you could debate for days.
Was it awkward? I seemed pretty straight-forward to me.Dr. McD said:Okay, it's just that I've heard some rather awkward metaphors used seriously.captaincabbage said:Uuh, yeah, that's what I was implying in the first place. o_oDr. McD said:This game has WORSE forshadowing, worse plot, not really as good as it sounds multiplayer and fails to understand what the title means (you could say it's called Black Ops because it's meant to be like an espionage themed action movie, but very little of the game feels like that, Modern Warfare 2 felt more like it had espionage in it).captaincabbage said:Are you sure they didn't use Modern warfare as a diving board instead?
Then again, direction you go from a diving board is down, so maybe that is an appropriate metaphor.
How did they ruin sniping exactly? I can still do it fine. Also, hacker. Use it, jeezthis isnt my name said:Oh they ruined sniping.
And one issue with MW2 was camping, howdo they tackle the issue ? Give them cameras, radar scramblers, and other crp to help them camp.